President Masoud Pezeshkian presented the draft budget bill for the Iranian year 1405 (starting on March 21, 2026) to parliament on Wednesday.
Lawmakers have until March 20, 2026, to review and approve the proposal, which has already sparked heated debate among economists, labor representatives, and political commentators.
The government says the budget was prepared with an emphasis on fiscal discipline, realistic revenue and expenditure estimates, and greater transparency.
Officials argue that the bill aims to control the budget deficit and curb inflation, which remains above 40 percent according to official figures and closer to 50 percent by independent estimates.
According to the bill, the total budget for next year amounts to roughly 10,144 quadrillion rials.
For the first time, the figures are presented using Iran’s newly approved rial unit, adopted in November, which removes four zeros. Under the new system, the same amount is recorded as 10,144 billion rials.
Total government spending is projected to rise by 28 percent.
Reliance on taxes instead of oil revenues
A central feature of the bill is its reliance on tax revenues rather than oil sales. Skepticism over the feasibility of this strategy is widespread, particularly amid expectations of intensified sanctions that could limit oil revenues and further strain businesses.
“Growth in the country’s tax revenues exceeds the inflation rate, and given that we have no economic growth—or even negative growth—this is not economically justifiable,” Gholamreza Salami, a senior tax expert, told the reformist daily Shargh.
Morteza Afqah, a professor of economics, voiced similar concerns in remarks to Entekhab, warning that higher tax revenues are unrealistic in the absence of economic growth.
“Continuing this trend will lead to the widespread closure of small and medium-sized enterprises, resulting in rising unemployment, deeper economic recession, and a further decline in consumers’ purchasing power,” he said.
Under the bill, the government plans to raise the value-added tax (VAT) rate from 10 to 12 percent and distribute the additional revenue directly to citizens through electronic food vouchers. Part of the proceeds would also be used to adjust pension payments for retirees.
Supporters argue that this approach is more targeted than broad subsidies, while critics warn it will further weaken household consumption.
Cutting subsidized currency and fuel signals
The draft budget also signals a significant reduction in subsidized foreign currency for imports to save 5.7 quadrillion rials (billion in the new system). While about €11 billion (around $12.9 billion) was allocated this year for importing essential goods, that figure will fall to €7 billion (around $8.2 billion) next year.
Currently, selected importers receive preferential currency at 280,500 rials per dollar, compared to a free-market rate that has surpassed 1.35 million. The recent suspension of this rate for rice and medicine imports has already driven steep price increases. Proponents of eliminating preferential rates argue that the wide gap between official and market exchange rates has fueled corruption and rent-seeking.
The government also plans to allocate nearly 5.5 quadrillion rials (billion in the new system) rials from revenues generated by imported gasoline sales to direct cash subsidies. Analysts say this strongly suggests gasoline price hikes next year.
In addition, the budget anticipates 2.9 quadrillion (billion in the new system) rials in revenue from selling wheat at non-subsidized rates, indicating a likely reduction—or complete removal—of preferential currency for wheat imports.
Pressure on salaried workers
Despite inflation exceeding 40 percent, the bill proposes only a 20 percent increase in salaries for government employees and retirees. At the same time, it significantly raises the tax-exempt income threshold, meaning nearly all teachers and about 70 percent of public-sector employees would be fully exempt from income tax.
Economist Kamran Nadri told Jam-e Jam that the cost of fiscal tightening is falling primarily on employees. He argued that the government is seeking to close the deficit not by eliminating inefficient institutions or redundant budget lines, but by suppressing wage growth.
According to Nadri, the projected increase in tax revenues would, if realized, fall largely on consumers and could fuel inflationary pressure. However, he added that if the government avoids monetary expansion, inflation caused by higher taxes and the removal of subsidized currency would not necessarily be permanent.
Opaque spending and institutional budgets
Despite official claims of transparency, the budget allocates around €7.5 billion (around $8.8 billion) in oil revenues to vaguely defined “special projects,” with no clear breakdown of expenditures. This extra-budgetary category accounted for nearly one-fifth of last year’s budget and, according to Donya-ye Eghtesad, more than two-thirds of the operational deficit.
Critics have also targeted increased funding for religious and promotional institutions, as well as state broadcaster IRIB, which is set to receive a 20 percent budget increase. The reformist daily Arman-e Melli warned that such allocations, combined with limited wage growth, risk fueling social unrest.
“The combination of severe inflation, soaring prices, and wage increases that cover less than half of current inflation should be a warning to the government that this kind of budgeting prepares the ground for future protests,” the paper wrote.
Nevertheless, hardline conservatives have also protested funding levels. Quds newspaper criticized cuts to the budget for promoting the “culture of pilgrimage.” Nasrollah Pejmanfar, a member of parliament from Mashhad, told the paper: “Unfortunately, neglect of the issue of pilgrimage has meant that people have not been able to benefit from it properly and have faced difficulties.”
Speaking to Arman-e Melli, reformist politician Fayyaz Zahed urged President Pezeshkian to seek Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s backing to gradually reduce funding for institutions reliant on public money. “If the president were to cut these budgets today,” he said, “his government would not last even a month. This is a very difficult and frightening confession to make.”