Ghalibaf says looming US deal leaves ‘no excuses’ for unmet commitments

The United Arab Emirates has already delivered about $3 billion to Iran and agreed to release billions more under an arrangement aimed at halting Iranian attacks on the Persian Gulf state, Reuters reported citing four sources.

Two regional sources said the UAE agreed to release a total of $10 billion, with more than $3 billion already delivered. Two other sources put the total funds involved at $20 billion, saying the move was agreed in return for Iran stopping missile and drone attacks on the UAE.

Reuters said it could not determine whether the funds came from UAE money or long-blocked Iranian accounts in the UAE banking system or elsewhere.

A UAE official said Abu Dhabi was seeking to reduce tensions and support regional stability.

Iran last directly attacked the UAE on May 4, when it struck Fujairah port.

Hardline Iranian lawmaker Mahmoud Nabavian criticized the emerging US-Iran agreement, saying the latest text was more damaging than two earlier versions and involved greater Iranian concessions.

“After seeing the text of the agreement, I must say that compared with the two previous versions, it is more damaging and Iran’s retreats have also increased,” Nabavian said.

He also posted a screenshot of President Donald Trump reposting Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi’s remarks that the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding had “never been closer,” using it to attack the Iranian officials involved in the talks.

“An agreement cooked up by the architects of the disgraceful JCPOA is certainly pure loss,” Nabavian wrote, using a phrase long used by hardliners to criticize the 2015 nuclear deal.

IRGC-affiliated Fars News criticized Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi for what it called an “ambiguous” response to President Donald Trump’s rejection of Iranian media reports about the terms of a possible US-Iran memorandum of understanding.

Fars said Araghchi’s English-language post on X, in which he said the “Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding had never been closer” and urged media outlets not to speculate about its content before finalization, failed to directly rebut Trump’s claim that the leaked Iranian version of the deal was false.

The outlet said Araghchi’s call for media restraint could be interpreted as an indirect confirmation of Trump's accusation that some of the published reports were inaccurate.

Fars also noted that Trump reposted Araghchi’s message shortly after it was published, portraying it as support for his own account of the negotiations.

The outlet questioned whether Araghchi’s language amounted to a retreat or an alignment with Trump’s narrative, especially after Trump claimed Iranian officials had privately apologized over what he called false information.

Fars said Iran’s public opinion needed clarity and firmness in response to US accusations, not “ambiguous” diplomatic language that could provide “media material” for Washington’s claims.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said on Friday a memorandum of understanding between Tehran and Washington is in the final stages of being compiled, but no final decision has yet been made.

"Regarding the text of the understanding, we are in the final internal review stages. A meeting of the relevant bodies is currently underway."

Baghaei said Iran’s positions and red lines had been clearly stated since the start of the Pakistan-mediated negotiations, adding that Tehran had sought to present its account “based on reality.”

He also said remarks suggesting the two sides are very close to an understanding were “not new.”

A senior US administration official said Friday Israel is expected to support a broad regional peace agreement with Iran once it sees the full terms, including provisions on the destruction and removal of Iran’s enriched material.

“When Israel sees the full terms of the deal, they will be comfortable with that,” the official told reporters, adding that the administration is “confident the Israelis will get on board.”

The official acknowledged deep mistrust surrounding the agreement but said dissent was believed to be “quite minimal,” including inside Iran, where “some Iranians don’t love this deal.”

The official said the agreement is broad in scope and that the sides had reached specificity on the destruction and removal of enriched material.