Republican US Senator Tommy Tuberville expressed support for increased pressure on Iran, emphasizing sanctions targeting key sectors like oil and gas.
“If you're going to put sanctions on somebody —what President Trump does—for Iran and for the regime that's even killing its own people—is, you do blockade. You take away their source of being able to make a living, and that’s through their oil and gas,” Tuberville told Iran International.


Nearly fifty years later, Iran International can reveal the untold story of a critical US mission to Tehran ordered by President Jimmy Carter to determine whether Mohammad Reza Pahlavi Shah could fend off a revolution.
Their conclusion, after facing militants' bullets and a ghostly encounter with the shell-shocked monarch, was that the US could no longer support its longtime ally's rule.
The consequences of Islamic Revolution to follow reverberate to the present day.
Ambassador John Craig, 80, was a young American diplomat when he was tasked with joining an exclusive group to meet the Shah alongside Senate majority leader Senator Robert Byrd.
It was a mission that went undisclosed even to American Ambassador to Iran William Sullivan, Craig told Iran International in an interview in Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, where he teaches at the local university.
In a storied career, Craig went on to serve as US ambassador to Egypt and Oman.
“President Carter asked Senator Byrd to make a special trip to Tehran to give him a personal assessment of the longevity of the Shah. There was great concern in Washington”, said Craig, “Could the Shah hold on? Could the Shah defeat the revolution?”
Their task was to help Carter transcend the disagreements within the US foreign policy over whether one of Washington's key allies in the turbulent region could be salvaged and provide an unvarnished take on the Shah's mettle.
“Some were saying, yes, the Shah could hold on, others no. One of the issues in that debate was how much force should be used to put down the revolution,” said Craig.
"There were those who felt that the Shah should really be aggressive and shoot people. And there were those who felt that reforms were the way to defeat the revolution.”


Mission: Tehran
To camouflage the trip's true purpose, Craig and the rest of the group made a diplomatic tour across the Middle East and the North Africa before arriving in Tehran.
Craig touched down in December 1978, just a few months before the Shah was ultimately toppled and as rebellion roiled cities nationwide.
Violence was escalating and martial law was in place as armed anti-Shah demonstrators roamed the streets chanting ‘death to the Shah!’

Because of the security risk, Craig and the team were not able to drive to the Shah’s Niavaran palace and instead flew by helicopter.
“We were flying. You could see out the windows that people were shooting at us,” Craig said.
When they arrived, Craig said he was astonished to see bare walls - no paintings, no antiques - in what was once among the world's most opulent palaces.
It became clear that the Shah was preparing to flee.

“I'm saying to myself, this is really weird. I said to myself immediately, these guys have packed up. They are ready to go. No question about that,” Craig said.
Entering the palace’s Hall of Mirrors, Craig caught sight of the Shah and his wife, Empress Farah Diba, standing to greet them.
'Inert' emperor
“He was comatose. Standing, but inert,” said Craig.
“I noticed that the Shah was looking straight ahead. He was not interacting. His eyes weren't moving. He did not raise his hand. But when the person put their hand in his hand, he didn't grasp it and he didn't shake it,” Craig said.

They went on to have lunch in the palace. Craig said the Shah did not speak once over the course of the meal, leaving the Empress to do all the talking. She appeared to be in control and running the country in the last days of their rule, Craig concluded.
“He didn't eat. He didn't move. He didn't say a word,” said Craig about the Shah.
Pleasantries and small talk dominated the discussion and the violence in the streets went unmentioned. Senator Byrd and Ambassador Craig left convinced that the Shah was unfit to rule.
Little did anyone at the time realize it, but the lunch was to help determine US policy and Iran's future course for the coming decades.
Screaming match
What followed next was a visit by Senator Byrd and Ambassador Craig to Ambassador Sullivan’s house in Tehran to break the news on the special visit.
While Ambassador Craig did not partake in the conversation, he could hear what Sullivan and Byrd were saying.
“There was a lot of screaming and yelling. They were arguing about what our policy should be going forward,” said Craig on the encounter between the two men.

The conversation lasted about three hours, with Sullivan coming to the defense of the Shah and pushing to have the Americans keep him in power. Byrd argued the Shah was already done for and unable to rule over a people in revolt.
On the flight back to the United States, Senator Byrd prepared his report to Carter.
“We were such a small group, of course, that we could hear what the senator was dictating in the memo to the president. So we we all knew what the senator was saying in his memo,” said Craig.
Once they arrived back to D.C, the Senator had a car waiting to take him straight to the White House, where he informed the president of his dire conclusion: the scion of Iran's 2,500-year monarchy was doomed.
“He went back and told the president: This is not going to work," Craig said.
"The Shah cannot continue.”
You can watch the full interview with Ambassador John Craig on YouTube.
The administration of US President Donald Trump remains committed to preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon and is still pressing for direct talks with Tehran, a National Security Council spokesman told Iran International.
Asked whether the administration sees any path forward for indirect engagement or dialogue given current tensions, the spokesman said: "President Trump and his administration remain committed that the Iranian regime never obtain a nuclear weapon, and we continue to press for direct talks."
Iran has ordered its military personnel to leave Yemen, the Telegraph reported on Thursday citing an unnamed Iranian official, abandoning its Houthi allies as the US escalates airstrikes against the group.
The report cited the official as saying that the move aimed to avoid direct confrontation with the United States if an Iranian soldier was killed.
Iran was also scaling back its strategy of supporting a network of regional allies to focus on the direct threats from Washington instead, the report added.
Tehran’s primary concern was “Trump and how to deal with him,” the report quoted the source as saying.
“Every meeting is dominated by discussions about him, and none of the regional groups we previously supported are being discussed,” the source added.
Iran could potentially agree to direct talks with the United States on the nuclear issue if progress is made during initial indirect negotiations, independent journalist Laura Rozen reported on Thursday citing an Iranian source.
The source, whom Rozen said spoke on condition of anonymity, indicated that indirect talks could begin in the next two to three weeks, likely in Oman, if the US is willing to engage. The talks are expected to be private at first.
Rozen cited the source as saying that if the indirect talks are successful in establishing a framework for negotiations, they could pave the way for direct talks.
The report added that Iran's negotiating team is expected to include Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister for Political Affairs Majid Ravanchi, who was a key figure in talks which achieved a previous international nuclear deal, and Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal Affairs Kazem Gharibabadi.
“Trump’s words are just hot air,” an Iranian lawmaker said Wednesday, dismissing the US President Donald Trump’s threat to bomb Iran if it fails to agree a nuclear deal.
“They know the extent of our offensive and defensive capabilities,” Fereydoun Abbasi said.






