Imprisoned ‘Reformist’ Condemns Hijab Crackdown ‘On Khamenei's Orders’

Mostafa Tajzadeh, a political prisoner at Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison, has voiced criticism against the Iranian regime's heightened enforcement of hijab laws targeting women.

Mostafa Tajzadeh, a political prisoner at Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison, has voiced criticism against the Iranian regime's heightened enforcement of hijab laws targeting women.
The criticism follows weeks of the Iranian authorities' renewed efforts to violently crackdown on women refusing to wear the hijab.
Tajzadeh, who previously briefly served as deputy minister of interior, said the regime’s crackdown, called “Plan Noor”, is executed under the orders or with the approval of Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.Tajzadeh's background as a senior official has led him to assert that no other authority in Iran, aside from the Supreme Leader himself, holds the power to dictate police actions. The contentious “Noor Plan” was implemented in response to Khamenei's recent directives for security and judicial forces to enforce the government-mandated hijab, particularly targeting women and girls who challenge the dress code.The plan has led to increased confrontations between citizens and security forces, reviving criticism domestically and internationally.The backlash intensified particularly after the recent death sentence handed down for prominent dissident rapper Toomaj Salehi, and revelations about the murder and sexual molestation of teenage protester Nika Shakarami by BBC World, which caused global condemnation.In his writing, Tajzadeh stressed that Khamenei's directives do not relieve other branches of government—such as the judiciary or the parliament—from their responsibilities to uphold citizens' rights."If this failed plan continues, the primary responsibility for its devastating consequences falls on Khamenei, who revived the morality police," Tajzadeh wrote.Tajzadeh argued that the regime, lacking a clear strategy for addressing rampant inflation and other deep-seated economic issues, resorted to oppressive measures to suppress public dissent."Inflation, corruption, and oppression are turning Iran and its cities into a ticking time bomb," Tajzadeh concluded, questioning whether the leadership understands the explosive potential of its own policies.

Israel is building a "cyber dome" to counter online threats, in particular those originating from Iran and its proxies, an Israeli official told AFP on Thursday.
While Israel's Iron Dome defense system has been protecting it from incoming rocket attacks for years, it is now trying to beef up its cyber security by building a system to ward off increasing threats from hackers.
"It is a silent war, one which is not visible," Aviram Atzaba, the Israeli National Cyber Directorate's head of international cooperation told AFP.
Since Israel launched its war on Hamas in Gaza, following the militant group’s attack on October 7 last year, the country has experienced a notable surge in cyberattacks from Iran and its allies, Atzaba said.
Since the war began, around 800 major cyber-attacks have reportedly been foiled.
Among the targets were government organizations, military infrastructure, and civil infrastructure; some, including hospitals in the cities of Haifa and Safedsome, could not be stopped.
Without going into details, Atzaba told AFP that for the past two years, the directorate has been attempting to develop a centralized, real-time system that proactively protects all Israeli cyberspace – emphasizing the project's collaboration with Israel's allies.
"It takes a network to fight a network," he said.
According to experts speaking to AFP, Iran's investment in cyberwarfare was spurred by two pivotal incidents. Firstly, the use of the internet by anti-government protesters to garner support for a post-election uprising in 2009. These protests erupted following the announcement of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's victory in the presidential election, amid widespread allegations of irregularities.
Iran's investment in cyberwarfare was also prompted by a cyberattack in 2010 that inflicted physical damage on Iran's nuclear program. Tehran attributed this attack to Israel and the US.
But, Israel is not the sole target of Iranian cyber attacks, with Iranian hackers belonging to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards’ (IRGC) hacking US governmental and private organizations.
In April the US Treasury Department imposed sanctions on individuals and companies accused of conducting cyber-attacks for the benefit of the IRGC’s Cyber-Electronic Command (IRGC-CEC).
“Iranian malicious cyber actors continue to target US companies and government entities in a coordinated, multi-pronged campaign intended to destabilize our critical infrastructure and cause harm to our citizens,” said Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Brian E. Nelson in April.
The US Justice Department and FBI also unveiled an indictment in April against Iranian individuals, accusing them of taking part in a coordinated hacking initiative from 2016 through April 2021.
Intelligence agencies in both the US and Canada also warned in February that Iranian state-sponsored hackers might interfere with their respective country’s elections.

Nearly half of the athletes selected for the 2024 Refugee Olympic Team hail from Iran, as announced by the president of the International Olympic Committee (IOC) during the unveiling of the team lineup for the upcoming Paris Olympics.
Out of the 36 athletes from 11 countries selected, 14—or almost 40%—are Iranian.
The considerable presence of Iranian refugees on the team follows a surge in the emigration of athletes, artists, and skilled workers from Iran, driven by ongoing anti-regime protests and increasing economic and political pressures over the past few years.
The 14 Iranian athletes, comprising 10 men and 4 women, have found new bases across Europe, including notable names such as Omid Ahmadisafa (Germany) in boxing, Matin Balsini (Britain) in swimming, and Mahboubeh Barbari Zharfi (Germany) in judo.
The mass defections come in the wake of at least 30 Iranian athletes seeking asylum in recent years, escaping not only the political repression in Iran, but also specific challenges within the sports sector.
Issues cited by athletes include corruption within sports federations, the enforced policy of not competing against Israeli athletes, and for women, the mandatory wearing of the hijab during competition.
The Islamic Republic’s policy of prohibiting its Olympic athletes from competing against Israelis stems from its longstanding enmity towards the country, after 1979.
Athletes are often pressured by the government-controlled sports federation officials to intentionally lose matches, forfeit, or cite injuries to avoid competitions against Israeli opponents.

Despite recent public outcry and opposition to the construction of a mosque in one of Tehran’s public parks, the head of the city council definitely said: "We should build prayer rooms and mosques in all parks."
Tehran’s citizens swiftly demanded the municipality stop the building of the mosque with a petition that circulated on social networks, garnering over 147,000 signatures within just a few days.
But, this all transcends the mere building of a mosque in Qaytariyeh Park in the north of Tehran.
Since 1979, the Islamist regime has escalated the count of mosques in Iran from approximately 25,000 to roughly 75,000 presently. Yet, as stated by a senior cleric within the regime, around 50,000 of these mosques remain shuttered, devoid of congregants for prayer.
Various polls converge on a singular explanation: the remarkable and rapid transformation of the Iranian populace towards irreligiosity and apathy towards religious rituals over the past four decades.
Last year, in a government study titled the National Attitude Survey of Iranians, respondents were asked about the change in the level of religiosity among the people compared to five years prior. 85% of respondents stated that, based on their observations, the level of religiosity among Iranians had decreased, while only 7% reported an increase.

So, why does the Islamist regime insist on building mosques that are likely to remain empty?
First: New mosques are constructed in areas where Basij bases and repression centers are absent or few, and the government uses the mosques as cover to expand its social and political control.
The Basij, which plays a significant role in quelling dissent, is a paramilitary volunteer militia force that operates under the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRGC).
In the past, the country's mosques have indeed been used to mobilize forces during street protests, and protesters have even been shot by Basiji snipers from rooftops. The government also seeks to establish a surveillance and information-gathering infrastructure within neighborhoods, without paying the price associated with public intimidation.
Second: The mosques are a base for gathering and recruiting for the regime's repression organizations. Today, the Islamist regime is desperately seeking to expand the network of Basiji forces and its plainclothes forces. In the past, these forces were the ones who assassinated the opposition figures. There were mosques with Imams such as Mojtaba Tehrani and Azizullah Khushvaght who were accused of issuing fatwas for killing dissidents and writers.
The attendees of their mosques were mostly working for the Iranian security agencies. The assassin who shot Saeed Hajjarian, an advisor to former President Mohammad Khatami, in the head, was affiliated with one of the politicized mosques.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has filled his security, military, and paramilitary apparatus with worshipers of the same type of mosques.
Third: The state-controlled mosques have become centers of brainwashing and political propaganda. These mosques host kindergartens and indoctrination classes that propagate anti-Semitism, anti-Westernism, anti-Americanism, and political Islam.
All of the aforementioned objectives are centered around security and political agendas.
The objective of attaining complete state control over mosques in matters of religion and religiosity entails direct intervention by governmental institutions in the organization and execution of religious ceremonies. This is achieved through: the appropriation of public spaces by advocating Sharia as a way of life, and by substituting religious teachings with governmental directives.
Prior to the establishment of the Islamist regime in 1979, Iranian mosques served as civil institutions for worship and congregation, with ownership being shared. The Imam of the congregation was selected by the local community, and management was overseen by a board of trustees elected by the locals, with minimal political involvement. Every class and group of Muslims could claim the local mosque as their own.

However, the Islamist regime usurped the mosques by establishing Basij bases, appointing Imams, and constructing new and additional mosques. Following the usurpation, it treated the public domain as its conquered property.
Over the past 45 years, any Imam who has made a critical statement against the government has been dismissed from their position. Sunnis are unable to have even a single mosque in major cities like Tehran, Mashhad, Kerman, and Shiraz.
The country's mosques underwent governmentalization through three specific processes.
The first involved the formation of the Headquarters of Imams and Congregations to appoint and control mosque imams. This institution was established in every province and operates under the supervision of the Leader’s office.
The second process entailed the establishment of Basij bases in mosques as the initial government institution installed there.
The third process involved setting up "cultural centers" within mosques, managed by the Supreme Headquarters of the Cultural and Artistic Centers of the country's mosques, aimed at countering the "cultural invasion of the enemy" as mandated by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution in 1992.
This way, the Islamist regime turned mosques that the Iranian people voluntarily built with their own hands and funds, into government institutions.
The regime transferred religious institutions such as seminaries, mosques, endowments, and mausoleums from civil institutions into completely state-owned entities.

The Iranian government says it has released the crew of a seized Portuguese-flagged ship linked to Israel, though it continues to hold the vessel itself seized last month.
The country’s foreign minister, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, said the crew of the Portuguese-flagged container ship MSC Aries can return to their respective home countries.
The minister claimed the release of the crew of 25 was a “humanitarian act”, while the ship itself remains under “judicial detention.”
The MSC Aries was seized by the Islamic Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) in the strategic Strait of Hormuz on April 13, shortly after Iran threatened to close the vital shipping route in retaliation for a widely-believed Israeli airstrike on its purported consulate in Damascus.
According to Amir-Abdollahian, the vessel was detained because it "turned off its radar in Iran's territorial waters and jeopardized the security of navigation," the foreign ministry explained in a statement posted on X late Thursday night.
The regime has seized several vessels since 2019 in what some say is a way for Tehran to show its naval might – and to keep pressure on different governments.
The foreign ministry previously cited "violations of maritime laws" as the reason for the Aries' seizure and emphasized its links to Israel. The MSC leases the Aries from Gortal Shipping, an affiliate of Zodiac Maritime, partially owned by Israeli businessman Eyal Ofer.
The seize of the vessel is part of a broader pattern of maritime disruptions, including recent attacks on merchant shipping in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden by Yemen’s Iran-backed Houthi rebels.
The attacks, which were reportedly conducted in solidarity with Palestinians amidst Israel's war on Hamas in Gaza, are contributing to significant perturbations in global shipping operations.

British billionaire and Virgin Group founder Richard Branson is adding his voice to high-profile figures condemning the death sentence handed down to Iranian dissident rapper Toomaj Salehi.
In a statement on the Virgin website, Branson expressed support for human rights activists advocating for Salehi’s release and the freedom of all prisoners in Iran.
"Toomaj and so many others must be freed," Branson wrote, emphasizing the importance of artistic freedom, stating that "open artistic expression should be welcomed and celebrated; it gives us opportunities to contemplate, reflect and debate. And it should never be persecuted – in Iran or elsewhere."
Salehi, one of Iran's most prominent rappers and a vocal and long-time critic of the regime, was sentenced to death last week by a non-independent Islamic Revolutionary Court under the charge of "corruption on earth."
The government’s intelligence ministry, which usually takes charge of sentencing dissidents, has historically exploited the vague term to target and silence them.
Salehi's years-long dissent took center stage during the nationwide 2022 anti-regime protests, where his outspokenness positioned him as one of the most prominent icons. For years, his music has resonated with many, particularly the youth who feel oppressed and silenced by the ruling authorities.
Branson’s statement also highlighted the ongoing human rights abuses in Iran, including the recent revelation that Nika Shakarami, a 16-year-old protester, was sexually assaulted and killed by Iranian security forces, contrary to official claims of her suicide.
The billionaire condemned the Iranian regime's continued violence and suppression, emphasizing the devastating impact on the nation's populace.
Branson's commentary also sheds light on the continued use of executions in Iran as a means to stifle dissent – with authorities having executed at least 853 people in 2023, many of whom were non-violent offenders or protesters.





