• العربية
  • فارسی
BrandBrand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

France calls for greater pressure on Houthis over attacks on Saudi Arabia

Nov 13, 2026, 14:18 GMT+0

France called on Friday for increased pressure on Yemen's Iran-backed Houthis to halt their attacks in the region, particularly against Saudi Arabia.

"It is necessary to increase pressure on the Houthis so that they put an end to their unacceptable attacks and provocations, particularly against Saudi territory, but not only there," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Pascal Confavreux told reporters.

He was responding to a question about whether France supported designating the Houthis as a terrorist organization at the European Union level.

Most Viewed

Trump vows ‘total victory’ as Iran rejects concessions and threatens wider war
1

Trump vows ‘total victory’ as Iran rejects concessions and threatens wider war

2

Iranian commanders threaten to kill Trump, strike US targets worldwide

3
ANALYSIS

US targets Iran's land trade routes, but Tehran may hold firm

4
INSIGHT

Iran says the US must ‘surrender’ to seven conditions. What are they?

5

Iran's top clerical governing body calls for nuclear doctrine review

Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Iran's intelligence merger debate signals possible security shake-up
    INSIGHT

    Iran's intelligence merger debate signals possible security shake-up

  • Americans ‘a bit naive’ about influence campaigns by Iran, Russia, China
    ONE-ON-ONE

    Americans ‘a bit naive’ about influence campaigns by Iran, Russia, China

  • Trump's Iran dilemma after America's 'everything' election
    OPINION

    Trump's Iran dilemma after America's 'everything' election

  • The faceless judge who sentenced 11 Iranian protesters to death in 2026
    SPECIAL REPORT

    The faceless judge who sentenced 11 Iranian protesters to death in 2026

  • Iran state TV panelists urge tougher action against US blockade

    Iran state TV panelists urge tougher action against US blockade

  • Iran’s largest ‘private’ bank is run by Supreme Leader’s business empire
    SPECIAL REPORT

    Iran’s largest ‘private’ bank is run by Supreme Leader’s business empire

  • France's cyberattack allegations against Iran should wake up Europe
    OPINION

    France's cyberattack allegations against Iran should wake up Europe

  • US targets Iran's land trade routes, but Tehran may hold firm
    ANALYSIS

    US targets Iran's land trade routes, but Tehran may hold firm

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran’s regime must go for nuclear threat to end, Reagan Institute’s Zakheim says

Nov 13, 2026, 13:55 GMT+0
•
Kambiz Tavana
100%
Roger Zakheim, director of the Ronald Reagan Institute, during an interview with Iran International in Washington, DC

The Islamic Republic will keep pursuing a nuclear weapon as long as it remains in power, and Washington should keep up military, economic and covert pressure even while it talks to Tehran, Roger Zakheim, director of the Ronald Reagan Institute, told Iran International.

Speaking on Veterans Day, Zakheim said President Donald Trump had set “the first principle” right by vowing to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, a promise he said Trump had made more than 90 times.

“My own view is that as long as this regime is in place, it will pursue a nuclear weapon,” he said. “So if he’s going to prevent the nuclear program, the regime will have to change as well.”

The interview came as Qatar stepped up its mediation. Its foreign ministry said on Tuesday that talks had made progress and that both sides had spoken positively about a diplomatic solution, a day after Qatar’s prime minister, Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, met Trump at the White House. Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, called reports of negotiations or a meeting in Qatar “a pure lie.”

Talks only with pressure

Zakheim, author of a new book on Reagan’s doctrine of peace through strength, said he had no objection to diplomacy, pointing to Reagan’s talks with Mikhail Gorbachev, as long as the pressure continues.

“I’m fine with talks to probe, to explore, to push, as long as we’re squeezing them at the same time: the blockade, the covert operation, the military presence, the ability to carry out a military operation at any moment,” he said. “If it’s diplomacy and everything else stops, I’d be very concerned.”

The US naval blockade of Iranian ports, first imposed in April, remains in place alongside a Treasury sanctions campaign the administration calls Economic Fury. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in Paris on Tuesday that the economic campaign was “so devastating that right now there is no need for major combat operations.”

Zakheim called the memorandum of understanding reached in June “a very flawed agreement.” Any new deal would need verification involving the United States, “not some third party we can’t trust or don’t know,” he said, and should be “ripped up” if Iran failed to comply.

The June 17 memorandum declared an end to military operations and set a 60-day window for a final deal on Iran’s nuclear program and sanctions. It soon unraveled over control of the Strait of Hormuz, and the deadline passed in August without an agreement.

“They’re just talking about talking,” Zakheim said.

‘The beginning of the end’

Zakheim gave Trump high marks for Operation Midnight Hammer, the June 2025 US strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, and for Operation Epic Fury, the US-Israeli campaign launched on February 28 that killed Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

“The decapitation, the attacks on the nuclear sites, taking out both the ballistic and cruise missile sites, has made this regime weaker,” he said.

But voters had soured on the war, he said, because the president “didn’t win decisively and got stuck in 140 days of diplomacy with a regime that will never compromise.”

He said he hoped a “very consequential covert program” was under way, with Washington backing those who want to replace the Islamic Republic. “We’ve never had an opportunity like the one we have right now to support the people in Iran who are freedom-loving,” he said, adding that Iran’s borders were “more porous than ever” and its skies open.

“It’s an unnatural regime that oppresses its people,” he said.

Iran executed at least 691 people in the first ten months of 2026, including 36 protesters, according to Norway-based Iran Human Rights, which recorded at least 77 executions in October alone.

No one was calling for US troops on the ground, Zakheim said, but Washington must be ready to strike again if Tehran rebuilds its nuclear or ballistic missile programs.

“After Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury, I felt it was the beginning of the end of this regime, and I still stand by that,” he said.

Midterms and the ‘declinists’

Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress in the November 3 midterm elections, with anger over the war’s part in pushing up the cost of living helping drive the result, according to Reuters. They also plan to cut Trump’s $1.5 trillion defense budget request, Military.com reported. Zakheim said the president was right to seek it.

The Constitution gives the president, as commander in chief, authority over military and foreign affairs that Congress does not share, Zakheim said, and presidents often turn to foreign policy after midterm losses “because it’s the one thing they can control.” Congress holds the power to declare war and to fund the military.

He warned against a “new generation of détente advocates” and what he called “full-on declinists,” some of whom won seats in the midterms.

“They believe that if only America would retreat from the world and leave, the Iranians would be just fine,” he said. “There’s no evidence of that in the history since 1979.”

He traced Washington’s experience with the Islamic Republic to the 444-day hostage crisis, which ended as Reagan was sworn in in January 1981, and the 1983 bombing of the US Marine barracks in Beirut, which he described as America’s first encounter with Hezbollah.

“You don’t have to look far back to find the number of times this regime has murdered Americans,” he said

Iran has money to kill journalists but not for bread, Nobel laureate Ebadi says

Nov 13, 2026, 13:34 GMT+0
100%
Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi

Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi accused the Islamic Republic on Friday of funding threats against journalists abroad while failing to provide for people at home, after two Iranian men were convicted in London of assisting Iranian intelligence operations.

  • Two men convicted in London of helping Iran target Iran International journalists

    Two men convicted in London of helping Iran target Iran International journalists

“The Islamic Republic keeps careful accounts. It has a budget for killing journalists, but not for people’s bread,” Ebadi, a lawyer who has lived in exile since 2009, wrote on her Telegram channel.

She shared an audio recording of Mostafa Sepahvand, one of two men convicted on Thursday at London’s Woolwich Crown Court of helping Iranian intelligence target Iran International journalists.

In it, Sepahvand complains about his travel and car-hire costs, the risk of arrest and the work of tracking down where journalists lived. He says he was sent only £3,500, about $4,600, though he had spent up to £8,000, about $10,600.

British prosecutors said he had been promised £150,000, about $200,000, and help resolving a criminal case against him in Iran, to “finish off” one of his targets.

“Even following journalists through the streets of London has a price,” Ebadi wrote. “The agent has to be paid, his car and travel covered, and if he is supposed to kill someone, the fee has to match the risk.”

  • Iran International spy verdicts don’t end threat to exiled Iranian journalists - CPJ

    Iran International spy verdicts don’t end threat to exiled Iranian journalists - CPJ

‘Not even a packet of biscuits’

In Iran, she wrote, there are families who cannot afford meat or medicine, workers who wait months for their wages and prisoners who cannot buy “even a packet of biscuits.” Yet the state had offered £150,000 to locate and eliminate a journalist working thousands of kilometers away.

“A government that won’t give workers what they are owed sets a fee for killing journalists, and apparently can’t even pay that on time,” she wrote. “In the Islamic Republic, even the lives of its opponents have a price. Only the lives of the Iranian people are worth nothing in its accounts.”

Sepahvand, 41, and Farhad Javadi Manesh, 46, were unanimously convicted of conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service under Britain’s National Security Act. Sepahvand was also convicted of surveillance and reconnaissance with intent to commit serious violence. They will be sentenced on December 17.

Prosecutors said the men watched Iran International journalists and others in Britain on behalf of Iranian intelligence. Tehran has denied involvement in plots against its critics abroad.

Iran International spy verdicts don’t end threat to exiled Iranian journalists - CPJ

Nov 13, 2026, 12:00 GMT+0
100%

Exiled Iranian journalists remain at risk despite the conviction of two men in London for targeting Iran International staff on behalf of Iranian intelligence, the New York-based Committee to Protect Journalists warned on Friday.

Mostafa Sepahvand, 41, and Farhad Javadi Manesh, 46, were found guilty on Thursday at London’s Woolwich Crown Court of assisting a foreign intelligence service.

Sepahvand was also convicted of conducting surveillance and reconnaissance with intent to commit serious violence against a person in Britain. Javadi Manesh was acquitted of a separate charge of surveillance intended to help others commit serious violence, and a third defendant, Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori, 57, was acquitted of all charges. The two men will be sentenced on December 17.

“The Woolwich trial has ended, but today’s verdicts don’t make the lives of our journalists any safer so long as the Islamic Republic of Iran continues its campaign of death threats and violence against them,” Iran International spokesman Adam Baillie said.

“Kambiz Hosseini and Mojtaba Pourmohsen and others remain under threat. We are thankful for the continued vigilance of the British police in protecting not only us but the many other Iranians targeted by Iran,” he said.

“Iran will no doubt continue its use of agents and proxies abroad in its campaign to terrorize its critics.”

CPJ calls for those behind operation to face justice

The six-week trial showed that Iran’s Revolutionary Guards had tasked the defendants with monitoring targets including the Iran International journalists Hosseini and Pourmohsen, a lawyer and a media production professional, CPJ said.

“The shocking evidence presented in this trial once again shows the lengths Iran is prepared to go to in order to silence journalists, wherever they are in the world,” said Fiona O’Brien, CPJ’s regional director for Europe and Central Asia.

“While it’s encouraging to see the perpetrators of crimes against them being held accountable, those who paid and instructed them must also be brought to justice,” she said.

Videos, photographs and messages showed Sepahvand watching his targets’ homes and workplaces while coordinating with contacts in Iran, according to Britain’s Crown Prosecution Service.

  • Two men convicted in London of helping Iran target Iran International journalists

    Two men convicted in London of helping Iran target Iran International journalists

  • Seven-man Iran-linked network helped orchestrate wave of attacks across Europe - ITV

    Seven-man Iran-linked network helped orchestrate wave of attacks across Europe - ITV

  • France probes blood freezer hack after blaming Iran for similar attacks

    France probes blood freezer hack after blaming Iran for similar attacks

The men had been promised large payments for information, prosecutors said. In one message, Sepahvand asked for £150,000, about $200,000, to “finish [the target] off” once he had found them.

“This was a calculated operation to spy on those critical of the Iranian regime,” said Frank Ferguson, head of the CPS Special Crime and Counter Terrorism Division.

Sepahvand had shown he was willing to go beyond surveillance to serious violence, Ferguson said, but the men were stopped before any attack.

Convictions follow series of attacks on Iranian journalists

CPJ said the convictions followed several other cases of threats and attacks against Iran International journalists in Britain.

Earlier this year, two Romanian men were sentenced to 12 and eight years in prison for their part in the 2024 stabbing of Iran International presenter Pouria Zeraati outside his London home.

A Greek national has been charged with surveilling an Iran International journalist, and court proceedings over an arson attack on the broadcaster’s premises are under way.

Exiled Iranian journalists continue to face physical threats, online harassment and intimidation of their families in Iran, CPJ said.

Tehran has denied targeting journalists working for Iran International and BBC Persian.

France probes blood freezer hack after blaming Iran for similar attacks

Nov 13, 2026, 09:49 GMT+0
100%

The US-based Committee to Protect Journalists warned on Friday that exiled Iranian journalists remain at risk after two men were convicted in London of spying for Tehran on staff of Iran International, which said the verdicts had not made its journalists safer.

The service, the Établissement français du sang (EFS), said in a written reply that a judicial investigation was under way and that it could not comment on it or give details.

The attack took place on the night of November 1 to 2. Hackers took over the control systems of cold rooms at three regional centers and changed their temperature and defrost settings, the EFS said earlier.

Some units were reset from about minus 30 degrees Celsius to 110 degrees, the French weekly Le Canard enchaîné reported. That was the setting, not the temperature the blood products reached.

  • France's cyberattack allegations against Iran should wake up Europe

    France's cyberattack allegations against Iran should wake up Europe

  • France warns Iran of retaliation over IRGC hack of supermarket freezers

    France warns Iran of retaliation over IRGC hack of supermarket freezers

Alarms and an on-call technician caught the problem, and the products were moved to other sites or otherwise secured, the EFS said. No samples or blood products were lost. The service has not said when the attack was detected, how long the transfer took, or how the stocks were moved.

The attack came the same night that supermarkets in at least nine European countries, including Belgium and Luxembourg, reported suspected cyberattacks that sent fridge and freezer temperatures soaring.

The Paris prosecutor’s office has not yet linked the attack on the blood service to the supermarket cases and said its investigation is continuing, Agence France-Presse reported.

The supermarket attacks

On October 11 and 12, hackers took control of refrigeration systems at about 700 supermarkets and other businesses across France, letting fridges and freezers warm up. Some stores had to throw out their entire stock of fresh and frozen food, and officials said the attacks caused heavy losses and, at some sites, fires.

A joint report by French intelligence and cybersecurity agencies named Shahid Kaveh, an offensive cyber unit of the Revolutionary Guards, as responsible, and said it worked behind front groups posing as independent hacker collectives. Paris prosecutors have requested international arrest warrants for suspects.

Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot summoned Iran’s ambassador and said France would seek European Union sanctions against those responsible. France was weighing further measures, he said, including some it might never make public.

Iran threatens Armenia as US-run Trump Route clears Yerevan’s parliament

Nov 13, 2026, 09:20 GMT+0
•
Maryam Sinaiee
100%
US President Donald Trump holds the hands of Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia's Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan as they shake hands between each other during a trilateral signing event, at the White House, in Washington, DC, August 8, 2025.

Armenia’s parliamentary approval of the Trump Route, a US-run transit corridor running along Iran’s northern border, has set off alarm in Tehran, with officials and state media warning that it would bring a US presence to the frontier.

Armenia’s parliament approved the agreement on October 28. Since then, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader has threatened Yerevan, and state-run media have urged Tehran to stop the project.

The Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP) is designed to link Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan through Armenia’s southern Syunik province. Syunik borders Iran’s East Azarbaijan province and carries Iran’s only direct land connection to Armenia, and through it to the rest of the Caucasus.

  • Iran’s northern routes test the limits of US bid to extend blockade overland

    Iran’s northern routes test the limits of US bid to extend blockade overland

The route was announced at the White House in August 2025, when President Donald Trump hosted Azerbaijan’s President Ilham Aliyev and Armenia’s Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan to sign a framework for peace between the two countries after decades of conflict.

Azerbaijan had long called the route the Zangezur corridor, and Tehran had opposed it for years, warning that it could cut Iran off from Armenia.

  • Iran says Caspian Sea a foreign policy priority on par with Persian Gulf

    Iran says Caspian Sea a foreign policy priority on par with Persian Gulf

  • State TV calls Iran’s northern sea by its English name, citing Israeli agenda

    State TV calls Iran’s northern sea by its English name, citing Israeli agenda

  • Iran moves to ratify Caspian Sea pact with seabed rights still unsettled

    Iran moves to ratify Caspian Sea pact with seabed rights still unsettled

Under the agreement, Washington and Yerevan will set up a joint company, TRIPP Development, with the US side holding 74 percent and Armenia 26 percent. The initial term is 49 years, with an option to extend it by 50 years, during which Armenia’s stake would rise to 49 percent.

Iranian officials and analysts say TRIPP could cut Iran’s transit revenue and weaken its position as a regional transport hub. They also see a US presence near Iran’s northern border as a serious security threat.

The state-run Mehr News Agency, in a November 9 article titled “The Caucasus on the Path to US Influence: Tehran Must Prevent Implementation of the TRIPP Corridor,” said Iran should rethink its approach to the Caucasus in light of what it called the country’s “new position in regional equations” after the war with the United States and Israel.

“A different approach centered on power,” Mehr said, could stop activities that threaten Iran’s national security from spreading in the South Caucasus.

Velayati threatens Armenia

Ali Akbar Velayati, an adviser to Iran’s supreme leader on international affairs and a former foreign minister, attacked Pashinyan over the agreement in an article in the Ettela’at newspaper on November 5.

Velayati said he had told Armenia’s deputy foreign minister and its ambassador in Tehran that Russia’s preoccupation with the war in Ukraine should not lead Armenia into a “miscalculation.” Iran, he said, considered itself responsible for security in the South Caucasus, “with or without Russia.”

  • Iran says it opposes Trump’s Caucasus plan as security threat

    Iran says it opposes Trump’s Caucasus plan as security threat

Iranian military commanders later traveled to the region and held a large exercise to show Iran’s “power and determination,” Velayati said. He said he had warned Armenia’s ambassador directly: “If Trump and his allies seek to cross this red line of Iran, we will break their legs.”

Armenia’s Security Council secretary, Armen Grigoryan, said in response that the project did not involve the presence of a single armed soldier, and that none of Armenia’s neighbors, Iran included, should see an economic project as a threat.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmaeil Baghaei, said on Monday that Tehran had raised its concerns with Armenia immediately after Armenia, Azerbaijan and the United States issued their joint statement on the project.

Armenia had assured Iran that the route would not change international borders or the region’s geopolitical arrangements, and that no US military forces would be stationed there, he said.

‘Yerevan’s gamble with Trump’s card’

Hardline media have kept up their attacks despite Armenia’s assurances.

On November 9, Jam-e Jam, a newspaper published by the state broadcaster, ran an article titled “Yerevan’s Gamble with Trump’s Card.”

“From the perspective of Iran’s national security doctrine, the emergence of an economic and administrative structure under US control in Syunik province, even if initially presented under the guise of transit and trade, is unacceptable,” the paper wrote.

Security threats do not have to begin with military bases, Jam-e Jam said. Strategic infrastructure and networks tied to hostile powers can lay the ground for long-term influence.

Mehdi Seif-Tabrizi, an analyst of Russian affairs, made a similar case in the Farhikhtegan newspaper on November 7.

“Tehran’s concern is fundamentally not limited to the possible deployment of US military forces. The issue is the formation of permanent infrastructure for influence in the vicinity of Iran’s borders, which could serve purposes beyond its initial economic objectives in times of crisis,” he wrote.

Iran’s concerns had grown more serious since its war with the United States, he added.