The United States says its blockade of Iranian ports has so far stopped all maritime traffic attempting to pass through.
In a post on X, US Central Command said that during the first 48 hours of the operation no vessels had made it past U.S. forces enforcing the blockade.
CENTCOM added that nine vessels complied with instructions to turn around and return toward Iranian ports or nearby coastal areas.
The International Monetary Fund expects at least a dozen countries, including some in Sub-Saharan Africa, to seek new lending programs due to surging energy prices and supply chain disruptions caused by the war in the Middle East, IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva said on Wednesday.
Georgieva repeated her estimate that the conflict could trigger demand for $20 billion to $40 billion in IMF lending, including augmentations of existing programs and new arrangements.
She warned countries against adopting untargeted measures such as broad energy subsidies to offset rising prices, saying they would only “prolong the pain of high prices.”
Iranian and regional efforts could lead to a ceasefire in Lebanon soon, Hezbollah lawmaker Ibrahim al-Moussawi told Reuters on Wednesday.
“The Iranians are exercising high pressure against the Americans and they have put their conditions that the Americans should include Lebanon in the ceasefire. If they don't do it, they are going to continue their blockade of Hormuz. It's the economic card,” Moussawi said.
“The Iranians have opened up to several regional and international parties to achieve this goal,” he added.
Moussawi declined to comment on whether the Iran-backed group would abide by such a ceasefire.
Fundraising drives across Indian-administered Kashmir have collected nearly $2 million for Iran following the killing of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, highlighting the depth of religious and ideological ties between the region’s Shia community and the Islamic Republic.
The connection runs deep enough that the region has long been nicknamed Irani Sagir (or Mini Iran.)
Across towns and villages, portraits of Khamenei appeared at donation events where residents contributed whatever they could spare: banknotes, gold jewellery and even copper utensils.
The collection drives, held in late March in cities including Budgam and Srinagar, allowed proceeds to be wired directly to the Iranian embassy in New Delhi. Iran’s embassy in India has also posted a QR code for donations on X since March 23.
In just one week, nearly ₹18 crore (about $2 million) was collected across Kashmir, excluding amounts deposited directly into the embassy’s account, according to local media reports.
One contribution seen by Iran International was ₹26 lakh (around $28,000).
The fundraising came weeks after widespread protests erupted across Kashmir following the US-Israeli airstrike that killed Khamenei on Feb. 28.
Demonstrations in Srinagar turned violent in places, leaving at least 12 people injured, including five police officers. Authorities responded with tear gas and batons, shut schools, throttled mobile internet for five days and arrested at least 50 people.
Among the outpouring of grief were calls for revenge from some protesters.“Those who oppress Muslims—we will kill them,” one unnamed demonstrator in Srinagar told Reuters on March 1.
The unrest prompted authorities to investigate several political figures accused of spreading inflammatory content online. Among them was Srinagar MP Aga Syed Ruhullah Mehdi, an influential Shia cleric with a cross-sectarian following.
“Some fools in J&K Police and administration think that by withdrawing/downgrading my security detail and suspending my Facebook account will stop me from calling out their atrocities. It is laughable,” Mehdi wrote on Facebook.
Former Srinagar mayor Junaid Azim Mattu also had his security withdrawn after condemning Khamenei’s killing on X.
Citrinowicz, Danny Citrinowicz, a fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv and former head of the Iran branch in Israeli military intelligence, warned that the donations were a possible indication that a post-Ali Khamenei Islamic Republic, likely dominated by the IRGC, would prove more operationally aggressive, not less.
"Those who think it will stay only at the level of donations are totally mistaken," he said.
For scholars of South Asian Islam, the reactions in Kashmir reflect a longstanding—though often misunderstood—connection between the region and Iran.
Justin Jones, a specialist in modern Islam in South Asia at Oxford University, said that for most Indian Shias the Islamic Republic functions primarily as a political symbol rather than a direct religious authority.
“The actual political thought of Velayat-e Faqih doesn’t cut very deep in much of India,” he said, referencing the Islamic Republic’s central doctrine of the Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist, founded by Ruhollah Khomeini after Iran’s 1979 revolution.
“It’s simply a kind of imaginary of Shia power, which has some psychological effect, but maybe not a political one.”
Kashmir, however, is different.
“Kashmir is one of the places that has been most receptive to Iranian influence,” Jones said, citing both themes of political justice that resonate with local Shia communities and ideological currents linked to Iran’s doctrine of Velayat-e Faqih.
“Iran is perceived as the representative of the Muslim world,” human rights activist Javed Beigh told Iran International.
“There was no other Muslim leader perceived as strongly against the United States and its allies as Seyyed Ali Khamenei,” said Beigh, who is a Shia Muslim based in Budgam.
That perception, he added, has also resonated with some Sunni Muslims across the subcontinent, particularly amid Israel’s war in Gaza.
A Kashmiri law student who asked not to be identified described two different responses among younger Shias.
One group, he said, views the Islamic Republic as a political system that must survive — and would find its collapse “almost existentially shattering”. The other sees Iran’s 1979 revolution as a historical process that may endure even if the current regime falls.
“They think of it as something in evolution,” he said. “It might fail temporarily, but they have a strong belief in the possible resurgence and resurrection of the system in the future.”
Simon Wolfgang Fuchs, an associate professor at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem who studies Shia Islam in South Asia and the Middle East, said the Islamic Republic’s influence in the region extends beyond politics.
“For them, Iran is very much a religious landscape—an enchanted place where you have a Shia-run state,” he said.
“The symbolic capital of Iran has not weakened… for South Asian Shia, Iran has been perceived as someone who stands by them and protects them.”
That connection has deepened as Iranian-trained clerics return to South Asia and pilgrims travel through Iran to reach holy sites in Iraq, experiencing the country as part of a broader sacred geography.
The Kashmiri student said many Shias in the region view that geography, stretching from Iran to Iraq, as central to the future of Shia political movements.
“Iran and Iraq are seen to inhabit the symbols of the sacred geography of the Shiite tradition,” he said. “If such a movement is going to be reborn, it must be around that geography—not outside it.”
He estimated that roughly 60 to 70 percent of Kashmiri Shias hold that view: that any future resurgence of the ideology would belong in the Middle East rather than South Asia.
Those ties are reinforced by institutions that operate independently of Tehran.
The Imam Khomeini Memorial Trust, an Iranian-linked organisation active in Kashmir, trains local clerics and funds religious education, according to research by the Middle East Forum.
Al-Mustafa International University, headquartered in Qom and funded directly by Iran’s Supreme Leader, operates affiliated seminaries across India and Pakistan whose graduates return to run religious institutions, according to research by United Against Nuclear Iran.
“Many people, even from my village, are still in Iran — living there, doing business, studying,” Beigh said. “That’s how you actually develop a strong bond between two communities.”
For some security analysts, however, those connections raise concerns about political radicalisation.
Sajid Yousuf Shah, a political analyst in Jammu and Kashmir with India's ruling Hindu nationalist BJP party, said ideological loyalty to the Islamic Republic runs deep within the region’s Shia community.
“They don’t want modernisation. They don’t want westernisation. They don’t want any regime change in Iran,” he said, arguing that many supporters hope for the Islamic Republic’s survival rather than its replication elsewhere.
Abhinav Pandya, CEO of the Usanas Foundation, a geopolitical think tank in India, said Tehran’s ideological outreach has fostered what he described as “extraterritorial loyalties”.
“Increasingly, the Shia Muslims in India have come under the influence of the Iranian regime,” he said. “That is very problematic.”
Pandya also pointed to contacts between Iran-aligned militant groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah and anti-India militant networks in the region, citing Indian media reports linking such groups to militant activity in Kashmir.
It was a similar concern voiced by Citrinowicz, who said Iran’s student and religious networks in India could potentially serve as recruitment channels.
“The platform they are able to build—through control of religious centres, through academia, through social media—has transformed these places into fertile ground for recruitment,” he said.
Citrinowicz points to the Islamic Republic’s history of retaliating globally following the killing of its senior figures, with plots disrupted across Africa, Europe and Asia after the assassinations of Qasem Soleimani and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh in 2020.
"Nobody should be surprised if you'll see in the next couple of weeks or months (Iran) again tries to do something against India.”
Indian officials familiar with the issue, however, say such fears may be overstated.
A former official at India’s National Security Council Secretariat said the solidarity expressed after Khamenei’s killing reflected religious sentiment more than political mobilisation.
“The reverence is more on the religious side than on a struggle side,” he said, describing the protests as a form of collective mourning typical of Shia communities.
While authorities were monitoring the donation drives, he said they did not consider them significant enough to warrant intervention. The donations themselves also reveal a more complex picture.
Local media reported that some Hindu donors sympathetic to Iran’s historical ties with the subcontinent also contributed to the fundraising drive.
Fabrizio Speziale, a Professor of Indo-Persian history at the School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences in Paris, said the cultural connections between Iran and South Asia have long crossed religious boundaries.
Persian culture historically served as a shared intellectual language across the region, linking Sunni, Shia, Hindu and even European scholars.
That legacy, he said, differs significantly from the modern political ideology of Velayat-e Faqih.
For Beigh, however, the bond between Kashmir’s Shia community and Iran transcends politics. “We have more than 90 percent of things we do in our daily lives similar to what you do in Iran,” he said.
Even if the Islamic Republic were to collapse, he believes the connection would endure. “They will have to embrace any change in Iran,” he said. “But the bond will remain.”
The United States and Iran have agreed in principle to meet but have not decided on a date or venue after marathon peace talks in Islamabad ended without a deal, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing officials familiar with the matter.
Regional mediators are pushing to extend the cease-fire between the United States and Iran and arrange a second round of talks, but progress has been slow, the officials said.
Progress on the talks remains slow, they added.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday he would not yield to pressure from US President Donald Trump for the United Kingdom to become involved in the Iran war.
“My position on Iran has been clear from the start: We’re not going to get dragged into this war,” Starmer said during Prime Minister’s Questions in Parliament.
“I’m not going to change my mind, I’m not going to yield. It is not in our national interest to join this war and we will not do so. I know where I stand.”