• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
PODCAST

Iran’s oil exports near zero as Persian Gulf flows recover

Negar Mojtahedi
Negar Mojtahedi

Iran International

Aug 28, 2026, 22:09 GMT+1
File Photo: Iran's Reshadat oil rig in the Persian Gulf
File Photo: Iran's Reshadat oil rig in the Persian Gulf

Iran’s ability to export fresh crude has fallen close to zero under the US maritime blockade, according to Kpler, just as Washington begins targeting the foreign banking networks Tehran relies on to collect the proceeds.

Crude and condensate flows from other Persian Gulf producers have recovered to around 70% of pre-war volumes, while Iran is struggling to move newly loaded crude, Homayoun Falakshahi, senior oil analyst at Kpler, told Iran International.

“It’s exactly the opposite scenario compared to the beginning of the war where Iran could export its oil but the neighbors couldn’t,” Falakshahi told Iran International’s English-language podcast Eye for Iran. . “And now it’s actually the contrary. Iran cannot export new oil.”

Goldman Sachs said Friday that oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz had recovered to around two-thirds of pre-war levels, according to Bloomberg, helping contain the impact of the conflict on global crude prices.

The figures point to a striking reversal in the oil war: the Strait is increasingly functioning again for Iran’s neighbors while Tehran itself struggles to get fresh crude to market.

Oil already on the water

The full impact on Iranian revenues, however, will take time to emerge because millions of barrels loaded before restrictions tightened are already outside the blockade zone.

Kpler estimates that roughly 40 million to 50 million barrels of Iranian oil remain on the water in Asia, substantially below an earlier estimate of around 80 million barrels.

Falakshahi said the revision reflects stronger-than-previously-understood discharges in China, now running at close to one million barrels per day.

At that rate, the remaining oil could take roughly 50 days to unload. Chinese buyers generally have another one to two months to pay Iranian sellers, creating a lag between the collapse in fresh exports and the loss of revenue.

If the blockade remains in place, Falakshahi estimated that within roughly three to four months Iran’s revenues from oil exports could effectively fall to zero.

China is central to that calculation. Falakshahi said it buys effectively all of Iran’s crude and condensate exports. When petroleum products and petrochemicals are included, he estimated China’s share of Iranian petroleum exports at roughly 90% to 95%.

From tankers to banks

Even as the blockade squeezes Iran’s ability to get new barrels to market, Washington is beginning to target the other end of the transaction: the foreign financial infrastructure Tehran uses to move the proceeds.

On Friday, the US Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed using Section 311 of the USA Patriot Act to cut Banque Misr’s UAE branches off from US correspondent banking, the first such action under Operation Economic Outcast.

Treasury said the branches processed approximately $1.8 billion between January 2024 and June 2026 for 103 companies potentially connected to Iranian shadow-banking networks.

According to Treasury, their customers included apparent front companies used by Iran’s Ministry of Defense and the Revolutionary Guards to evade US sanctions, as well as entities used to launder money on behalf of Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

Max Meizlish, a former official with the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, said the significance of the move lies in Washington beginning to target foreign banks that make Iran’s sanctions-evasion networks possible, rather than focusing primarily on Iranian entities and front companies.

Section 311 allows Treasury to threaten a foreign bank’s access to the US financial system without immediately freezing its assets, while giving the institution and its regulators an opportunity to address the activity before restrictions take effect, he said.

“The real test now is whether this becomes a sustained campaign and whether Treasury is willing to bring the same pressure to bear on Iran’s financial enablers in Hong Kong and China,” Meizlish told Iran International.

That question is particularly important given China’s dominant role in Iran’s remaining oil trade.

Meizlish has identified China’s Bank of Kunlun as one potential target for further US action. The bank has previously faced US restrictions over dealings involving Iran, but he argued Washington could go further by imposing full blocking sanctions.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had signaled that a major action against a financial institution was coming under Operation Economic Outcast.

Friday’s move suggests Washington is beginning to extend its campaign beyond Iran’s physical oil exports to the foreign financial infrastructure that allows Tehran to receive and move its money.

For global markets, the recovery in other Persian Gulf exports is helping blunt the energy shock. For Tehran, the trajectory is moving in the opposite direction: fewer opportunities to export fresh oil, a diminishing stockpile already outside the blockade and growing pressure on the financial networks through which it gets paid.

The blockade is squeezing Iran’s ability to sell its next barrel. Operation Economic Outcast is increasingly aimed at making it harder to collect the money for the barrels that got out.

Most Viewed

Iran sentences woman detained during January protests to death
1

Iran sentences woman detained during January protests to death

2

Iran's Bank Melli remains open in Germany despite sanctions

3

Man from Supreme Leader's empire takes the helm of Iran’s biggest online retailer

4
INSIGHT

Who is Abolfazl Shekarchi, the Iranian general calling journalists military targets?

5
INSIGHT

Tehran debates austerity as US targets sanctions lifelines

Banner
Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Iran’s oil exports near zero as Persian Gulf flows recover
    PODCAST

    Iran’s oil exports near zero as Persian Gulf flows recover

  • Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr
    ANALYSIS

    Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr

  • War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price
    ANALYSIS

    War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price

  • Three mediators in three days seek path back to Iran-US talks
    INSIGHT

    Three mediators in three days seek path back to Iran-US talks

  • ‘State-sponsored theft’: UN representative calls out rising seizures from Iran’s Bahá’ís

    ‘State-sponsored theft’: UN representative calls out rising seizures from Iran’s Bahá’ís

•
•
•

More Stories

War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price

Aug 28, 2026, 18:30 GMT+1
•
Behrouz Turani
100%
Iran's security chief and former IRGC commander Mohsen Rezaei

Mohsen Rezaei on Friday set out four Iranian conditions for an agreement with the United States, another sign that the former IRGC commander who once championed an “offensive doctrine” may be moving from advocating war to contemplating a deal at the right price.

Rezaei named an end to the regional war, lifting the blockade of Iranian ports, compensation and sanctions relief as Iran’s core conditions. He said the demands had been compiled in response to requests from mediators.

Rezaei has served since August 10 as secretary of the Supreme National Security Council and is also the Supreme Leader’s representative on the body, giving his remarks greater institutional weight than those of an individual political or military figure.

Whether the conditions constitute a formally approved negotiating mandate, however, remains unclear. Rezaei’s description suggests an ongoing process of defining Iran’s negotiating position rather than the presentation of final instructions to negotiators.

Since taking over the SNSC, Rezaei has increasingly emerged as one of the principal voices through which Iran’s security establishment frames diplomacy.

The council brings together senior military, intelligence and government officials alongside representatives of the Supreme Leader, who holds ultimate authority over major national security decisions.

Back to MoU

That makes the evolution of Rezaei’s language significant. His movement from advocating an “offensive doctrine” to discussing the terms of a possible agreement has not amounted to an embrace of accommodation with Washington.

But diplomacy is increasingly appearing in his rhetoric as an instrument of Iranian strategy rather than something inherently at odds with it.

Only days ago, Rezaei told Pakistan’s Field Marshal Asim Munir that Washington needed to change its behavior and take practical steps to implement the Islamabad MoU. Iranian media, including Press TV, quoted him as saying the United States should return to the June agreement.

That was notable because the Islamabad MoU provided a framework for de-escalation: ending hostilities, reopening the Strait of Hormuz and moving toward a broader agreement.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has also defended the MoU as the best available path while emphasizing adherence to the Supreme Leader’s policy.

Friday’s demands do not necessarily reverse that position. Rather, they fit an evolving sequence in Rezaei’s public stance: initial rejection of the MoU, movement toward reviving the June framework and now a willingness to discuss negotiations while attaching a higher price to them.

Tactical shift

There is an echo here of Donald Trump’s own approach to the conflict. The US president has moved between military pressure, diplomacy, rejection of the MoU, economic pressure and renewed suggestions that an agreement remains possible.

Both sides appear to be using uncertainty itself as leverage: escalating, reopening the door and then raising the terms for walking through it.

That does not mean Rezaei is consciously emulating Trump. But his recent statements suggest a similarly transactional approach in which apparently contradictory positions can coexist.

Negotiations remain possible, while threats and maximal demands are used to improve the terms on which they might take place.

For Rezaei, this represents a change in tactics rather than ideology. He has not abandoned the hardline worldview that has defined much of his political career, nor do his statements yet signal a broader Iranian pivot toward accommodation with Washington.

More significant may be the evolution of the role he is now playing. The former IRGC commander is no longer simply warning against compromise; he is beginning to define its price.

US targets Egyptian bank in first strike of economic war against Iran

Aug 28, 2026, 17:35 GMT+1
100%
File Photo: People walk in front of Banque Misr in Cairo, Egypt, November 3, 2016

The US Treasury moved Friday to cut the UAE branches of Egypt’s Banque Misr off from direct access to the US financial system over alleged dealings with Iran, marking the first major action in Washington’s new “Economic D-Day” campaign against Tehran.

The Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network proposed barring Banque Misr’s six UAE branches from correspondent banking access to US financial institutions, restricting their ability to conduct dollar transactions.

Treasury estimates the branches processed about $1.8 billion in transactions between January 2024 and June 2026 for 103 companies potentially linked to Iran’s shadow-banking networks, describing the operations as a “critical node” in Tehran’s access to US dollars.

“Treasury promised to sever every economic lifeline Tehran has left and finally end the threat of the Iranian regime,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said.

“We also warned that Iran’s enablers cannot continue to enjoy access to the US dollar and the global financial system,” he added. “Banque Misr UAE decided to find out the hard way.”

Bessent had previewed a “major announcement” involving secondary sanctions against an international bank earlier this week as he launched what Washington has called an “Economic D-Day” against Iran and institutions that facilitate its trade.

The measure is narrower than Bessent’s warning initially suggested. It applies only to Banque Misr’s UAE branches, leaving its Cairo headquarters and branches in countries including France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon and Djibouti able to continue conducting dollar transactions.

The proposed restriction is also subject to a 30-day public comment period before taking effect.

The Financial Times said the limited scope highlighted Washington’s reluctance so far to target major Chinese banks and other large financial institutions involved in financing Iranian trade, amid concerns over potential disruption to global markets and retaliation.

China remains particularly important to Tehran. Chinese purchases of Iranian oil account for about 45% of the Iranian government budget, according to the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, cited by the FT.

The Treasury separately sanctioned Reza Mohammad Taeedi, general manager of Iran’s Bank Melli branch in Dubai, as well as a Hong Kong-based company it accused of helping launder money for a sanctioned Iranian exchange house.

Banque Misr UAE did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment on Friday, while Reuters said it was unable to reach Taeedi.

The measures come as Washington seeks to intensify economic pressure six months into its war with Iran while avoiding measures that could cause wider financial disruption. Iran has urged other countries not to participate in the new US sanctions campaign.

Iranian banks and businesses remain open in Dubai despite Trump’s D-Day - WSJ

Aug 28, 2026, 12:14 GMT+1
100%

Iranian banks and businesses continue to operate in Dubai despite Washington’s demand that countries sever their remaining economic links with Tehran, exposing the difficulty of isolating Iran from one of its most important commercial hubs, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The activity is an early test for Operation Economic Outcast, the Trump administration’s campaign to cut Iran off from global finance, trade, aviation and shipping. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that foreign entities continuing to deal with Tehran could face US penalties, while Washington has initially given governments and companies a short period to wind down ties.

Yet the Journal found little visible change in Dubai this week.

Bank Melli Iran, which Bessent specifically called on foreign governments to close, was still operating its two Dubai branches. At its multistory Deira location, about a dozen tellers continued serving Persian-speaking customers after the US announcement.

Employees said they had received no order to close. Bank Melli has operated in the UAE since 1969, before the country was established, and Dubai’s ruler inaugurated its first branch.

  • Iran's Bank Melli remains open in Germany despite sanctions

    Iran's Bank Melli remains open in Germany despite sanctions

“We put our trust in God on what happens next,” one employee told the Journal.

Iranians in Dubai said they were preparing alternatives if banks eventually close, including the centuries-old hawala system, which moves money through trusted intermediaries without conventional cross-border transfers. So far, they said, that has not been necessary.

The situation contrasts with a crackdown earlier in the war, when the UAE closed the Iranian Hospital and Iranian Club, temporarily barred Iranian passport holders from entering or transiting the country and canceled some visas, including those of long-term residents traveling abroad.

The hospital and club remain closed, but Iranians told the Journal that widespread visa cancellations appear to have stopped and some visas have been restored.

Iranian airlines also continue regular direct flights to the UAE. Emirates, Etihad and FlyDubai are not flying directly to Iran, although some services use Iranian airspace. Iranian restaurants and cafes in Dubai remain open.

That activity sits uneasily with the UAE Foreign Ministry’s announcement last week that it was halting trade, commercial exchanges and financial transactions with Iran.

The UAE was Iran’s second-largest trading partner before the war, with bilateral trade of around $27 billion annually, about 80% of it Emirati exports to Iran.

The relationship extends far beyond official trade. Hundreds of thousands of Iranians live in the UAE, particularly Dubai, gaining access to global finance and freedoms unavailable under the Islamic Republic while bringing billions of dollars in Iranian capital into the Emirates.

Those links have survived despite Iran firing more than 2,800 missiles and drones at the UAE during the war, according to the Journal.

Chatham House associate fellow Neil Quilliam told the Journal that UAE economy is ”so closely integrated and intertwined with the Iranian economy, you can’t just simply sever economic trade and activity overnight.”

The US has long focused on Dubai’s role in Iranian finance. Former Treasury official Matthew Levitt said the UAE has the second-largest number of US-sanctioned individuals and companies linked to Iran after China.

  • What Operation Economic Outcast means for Iran, and for everyone trading with

    What Operation Economic Outcast means for Iran, and for everyone trading with

A US Treasury Financial Crimes Enforcement Network study cited by the Journal found Dubai-based companies moved $6.4 billion in potential Iranian shadow-banking funds in 2024, accounting for 71% of the global total identified.

The first Operation Economic Outcast sanctions targeted nearly 60 Iran-linked people, companies and vessels operating across countries including the UAE, China, Singapore and Switzerland.

Washington nevertheless faces its own dilemma. The UAE is a major US security partner, provides military basing access, invests heavily in sectors including artificial intelligence and was a principal Arab signatory of the Abraham Accords with Israel.

Dubai, unlike oil-rich Abu Dhabi, also depends heavily on trade, finance and foreign capital.

“There will be some in the UAE who say, ‘Whatever the price of calm, that is what we need to do,’” Levitt told the Journal, suggesting some officials may regard continued Iranian access to banking and supply chains as preferable to greater confrontation.

Iranians in Dubai also fear the prolonged war could weaken the UAE economy, cost them their jobs and force them back to Iran. Some have already moved to third countries.

Iran threatens US economic interests if maritime blockade continues

Aug 28, 2026, 03:27 GMT+1
100%
An Iranian missile system is displayed in Azadi Square in Tehran, Iran, July 30, 2026.

Iran will target US economic interests if Washington maintains its maritime blockade, Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei said Thursday, as the Trump administration steps up efforts to tighten Iran’s economic isolation.

“If the blockade continues, we will target US economic interests 100 percent, with intensity and force,” Rezaei told Lebanon’s Al-Manar television.

Rezaei also warned Israel against resuming the war, saying any new conflict would be different from previous rounds.

“We will send Netanyahu to hell,” he said, adding that the Israeli prime minister had made “major mistakes” that had brought Israel closer to its end.

Tehran has taken a tougher stance since a ceasefire agreed in June failed to produce a broader agreement and the subsequent MoU expired, despite mounting economic problems and Washington’s recent announcement of an “economic D-Day” against Iran.

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is preparing to press G20 finance ministers next week to comply with Washington’s sanctions on Iran, according to AFP.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that Tehran was “begging to make a deal,” declaring that “Iran Is a Failing Nation!” in a social media post.

Rezaei shrugged off Trump’s Operation Economic Fury, claiming Iran had already “broken the maritime blockade” during the ceasefire and exported between 70 million and 80 million barrels of oil.

He said oil sales had returned to pre-sanctions levels and that Tehran had established new export routes that were gradually expanding.

The US military rejected that claim hours later.

“Iran has exported zero oil from its shores since we resumed the naval blockade in mid-July,” US Central Command said, adding that other countries in the region had exported 750 million barrels of oil from the Persian Gulf during the same period.

Rezaei also said Iran and Oman had agreed on a shipping corridor running partly through Omani and partly through Iranian waters.

Commercial vessels would be allowed through a designated central channel in the Strait of Hormuz if the United States met Iran’s conditions, he said.

Rezaei added that mediators had asked Tehran to set out its conditions for reopening the strait and that Iran was preparing a list of demands, including an end to the war in the region.

Three mediators in three days seek path back to Iran-US talks

Aug 27, 2026, 22:01 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee
100%
Qatar’s Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani shakes hands with Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian in Tehran. August 27, 2026

Three regional mediators have visited Tehran in three days in an intensifying diplomatic push to revive Iran-US talks, even as the two sides remain deeply divided over the Strait of Hormuz and Washington’s economic pressure campaign.

Qatar’s Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani arrived on Thursday, following Omani Foreign Minister Badr Albusaidi on Tuesday and Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir on Monday, as regional powers seek to create a path toward de-escalation and renewed negotiations.

Al Thani’s visit, his first to Iran since the war began in late February, came after days of diplomacy focused partly on finding an arrangement over Hormuz that could provide an opening for broader talks.

He met President Masoud Pezeshkian, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, Parliament Speaker and senior negotiator Mohammad-Bagher Ghalibaf and security chief Mohsen Rezaei.

The messages he received reflected the competing currents shaping Tehran’s response to the diplomatic push.

Pezeshkian praised efforts by Qatar, Pakistan, Oman and other countries to promote peace and security in the region. He also pointed to factions in the United States, Israel and Iran that he said were trying to prevent agreements from taking shape, urging US officials to ignore voices opposed to a return to stability.

Ghalibaf told Al Thani that an economic blockade of Iran would be ineffective and said Washington should implement commitments made under the Islamabad memorandum.

Rezaei struck a more confrontational tone, warning that Iran would target US military and economic interests if Washington sought to “commit mischief” against Iran. He reiterated that the Strait of Hormuz would remain closed unless the United States met Tehran’s conditions.

Qatar’s Foreign Ministry said Al Thani discussed regional developments, efforts to reduce tensions and creating conditions for the resumption of dialogue between Tehran and Washington.

Mediators push for talks

The flurry of diplomatic activity has fueled speculation in Iranian media that Tehran and Washington could return to negotiations, although there is little indication that a breakthrough is imminent.

Iran Nuances, an English-language outlet apparently linked to Iran’s Foreign Ministry, argued that the succession of visits reflected concern among regional states that intensified economic pressure could produce wider instability rather than force Iran to capitulate.

The Iranian news agency ILNA was more cautious. In a commentary headlined “Can Qatar Unlock the Negotiations?”, it said the gap between Tehran and Washington remained too wide for Qatar’s mediation to be certain of success.

“If Iran considers lifting economic pressure and ending the blockade a precondition for any opening, while the United States continues to insist on increasing pressure, even activating Qatar’s mediation channels will not necessarily lead to the resumption of negotiations,” it said.

ILNA suggested that Doha could instead begin by mediating over de-escalation and freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz, potentially creating an opening for wider negotiations.

Economic daily Donya-ye Eqtesad described the succession of regional visits as a form of “multi-layered diplomacy” aimed at developing a phased roadmap involving Iran, the United States and regional mediators, with maritime arrangements providing an initial route toward de-escalation.

But optimism in parts of the Iranian media contrasts sharply with Washington’s public posture.

US President Donald Trump told Al Jazeera on Wednesday that he was “not in a hurry” to resume negotiations with Iran and had set no timetable for ending the war. He said economic pressure and military action were proving effective.

White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt said Thursday that there were currently no negotiations between the United States and Iran and that all options remained on the table.

Fate of missing Iranian pilots

Al Thani’s visit also brought renewed attention in Tehran to the fate of Iranian pilots who went missing in March after their Sukhoi fighter jets were shot down over Qatar.

Iranian officials say three pilots survived after ejecting from their aircraft, were captured by Qatari forces and have been held there since.

Qatar strongly rejects that account. Doha says its search-and-rescue teams found the remains of one pilot and handed them to Iran, but that it has no information about the fate of the others.

Iran has requested that an Iranian Air Force expert team and the International Committee of the Red Cross become involved in determining their fate.

Iranian army spokesman Mohammad Akraminia said Wednesday that if Qatar genuinely did not know what had happened to the pilots, it should make greater efforts to establish their whereabouts.

Fada-Hossein Maleki, a member of parliament’s National Security Commission, said Thursday that the lack of clarity over the pilots remained a source of tension with Doha and warned that any evidence they had been mistreated would affect bilateral relations.

Hardliners also seized on the issue during Al Thani’s visit, accusing Iranian officials of failing to press Qatar publicly over the pilots’ fate.