• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Probe finds scholar misused Swedish public funds for his pro-Tehran group

Oct 6, 2025, 23:16 GMT+1Updated: 00:30 GMT+0
Roozbeh Parsi
Roozbeh Parsi

An internal investigation by a major Swedish think tank found that an Iranian scholar used his university affiliation to garner millions in public funds for his pro-Tehran association, a Stockholm-based magazine reported.

Roozbeh Parsi, the former head of the Middle East and North Africa Program at the Swedish Institute of International Affairs (UI), stepped down in May following the conclusion of a UI internal investigation into his alleged links to an Iranian influence network.

Months after his resignation, the Swedish magazine Fokus has now published new details from UI’s internal investigation showing that Parsi used Lund University’s name and received millions of kronor in public funding through his private association, the European Iran Research Group (EIRG).

According to the Fokus report, Parsi used Lund University to give his association institutional legitimacy, enabling it to secure millions in Swedish taxpayer money.

The UI internal investigation found no evidence that Parsi or EIRG were funded directly by Tehran, but the group had received millions of kronor in Swedish public funds.

However, Fokus reports that money was also collected under the banner of Lund University. EIRG is, and remains, registered at Lund University’s address in the corporate registry.

Jakob Hallgren, head of the Swedish Institute of International Affairs, told Swedish public broadcaster SVT that new information about Parsi’s long-running association EIRG had shown it to be incompatible with his position as program director, leading to his departure from UI.

Documents obtained by Fokus showed that EIRG had an internal project account in Lund University’s bookkeeping, covering travel and conference expenses. One entry from December 2017 recorded a transfer of 41,433 kronor in faculty funds to the EIRG project, the Fokus report said.

When contacted, Gisela Lindberg, head of communications for the Faculties of Humanities and Theology, said the address was “an outdated listing that remained from earlier,” adding that it would be removed. The university, however, did not comment on the financial transfers despite documentation confirming them.

Fokus reported that by presenting itself as part of Lund University, EIRG secured additional grants from Swedish institutions and foundations. The Swedish Institute, for example, signed a contract with EIRG in December 2016 to conduct a study on Iranian public-sector capacity, with Parsi himself listed as the contact person. SI confirmed that it knew EIRG’s registered address was the Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Lund University.

The Swedish foreign ministry also awarded EIRG about 365,000 kronor in 2015 for a Tehran conference co-hosted with the Institute for Political and International Studies (IPIS), a think tank directly controlled by Iran’s foreign ministry. The grant application listed Lund University as the sender. Parts of the conference were later canceled for political reasons, and EIRG returned more than 200,000 kronor.

According to Sweden's TV4, Parsi attended meetings with senior Iranian diplomats and appeared on membership lists for the Iran Experts Initiative (IEI), a network formed by Iran's foreign ministry to promote the Islamic Republic's foreign policy and nuclear strategy through scholars based abroad. The IEI was uncovered in a 2023 joint investigation by Iran International and Semafor.

Despite his resignation from UI, Parsi remains employed as a researcher at Lund University and continues to appear in Swedish media as a Middle East expert. Fokus says he did not respond to its request for comment.

Sweden’s then–foreign minister, Maria Malmer Stenergard, told reporters in February 2025 that the allegations against Parsi were “very serious,” adding that Iran was conducting intelligence activities against Sweden, and Stockholm took that "extremely seriously.”

Most Viewed

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks
1
EXCLUSIVE

Iran negotiators ordered to return after internal rift over Islamabad talks

2
INSIGHT

Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

3
ANALYSIS

US blockade enters murky phase as tankers spoof signals and buyers hesitate

4
ANALYSIS

Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

5

US tightens financial squeeze on Iran, warns banks over oil money flows

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage
    INSIGHT

    Hardliners push Hormuz ‘red line’ as US blockade tests Iran’s leverage

  • Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'
    INSIGHT

    Ideology may be fading in Iran, but not in Kashmir's ‘Mini Iran'

  • War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses
    INSIGHT

    War damage amounts to $3,000 per Iranian, with blockade set to add to losses

  • Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth
    ANALYSIS

    Why the $100 billion Hormuz toll revenue is a myth

  • US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption
    ANALYSIS

    US blockade targets Iran oil boom amid regional disruption

  • Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout
    INSIGHT

    Iran's digital economy battered by prolonged blackout

•
•
•

More Stories

UK court seizes Iranian oil company’s £100 million London property - media

Oct 6, 2025, 15:35 GMT+1

A UK appeals court has upheld an earlier ruling ordering the seizure of a London property owned by the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC) to help satisfy a $2.4 billion arbitration award in favor of an Emirati firm, Iranian media reported on Monday.

The property, known as the NIOC House, is located near the British Parliament and has been owned by Iran for around 50 years.

Brutalist in style, it became the headquarters of Iran's national oil company under the country's ousted Shah soon after it was completed in 1975 and reflects design elements of Westminster Abbey across the street.

Iran's diplomatic isolation has deepened as a lingering impasse over its disputed nuclear program prompted European states to trigger UN sanctions which resumed late last month, further squeezing Iran's beleaguered economy.

The slow-motion legal dispute which stretches back appears to have no relation to the current geopolitical standoff.

UAE-based Crescent Petroleum said in its complaint that NIOC illegally transferred the property to a separate entity the Oil Industry Pension and Welfare Fund after the international arbitration ruling, in what the company called an attempt to keep assets out of creditors’ reach.

IRNA’s correspondent in London cited an informed source as saying that lawyers representing the Islamic Republic of Iran have filed an appeal against the latest ruling.

If the previous ruling is upheld, IRNA cited the source as saying, Iran’s lawyers can refer the case to the UK Supreme Court for review — a process that is usually lengthy and could take up to two years.

A lower UK court had already voided that transfer, describing it as a maneuver to prevent debt recovery. NIOC and the pension fund appealed the verdict, but the Court of Appeal dismissed their objections and affirmed that the building could be seized.

Judges found that the documents presented by NIOC to prove the pension fund’s ownership did not meet the necessary legal conditions, clearing the way for the property to be placed under judicial control.

The court said the building would remain under UK jurisdiction to partially offset the damages owed to Crescent Petroleum.

Dispute dates back over two decades

The ruling marks the latest turn in one of Iran’s longest and most politically charged energy disputes.

The Crescent case dates back to a 2001 contract between NIOC and Crescent Petroleum to supply 500 million cubic feet of sour gas per day from Iran’s Salman field. The deal, signed under then-Oil Minister Bijan Namdar Zanganeh, collapsed amid internal opposition in Tehran, prompting years of arbitration and litigation.

Iran was found liable for breaching the contract and was ordered to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in damages. In recent years, Crescent has moved to enforce those awards by targeting Iranian state assets abroad.

The London property was valued at about £100 million ($125 million), Iranian media said.

The Iran daily, a state-run outlet, attributed the loss of NIOC assets to “political interference by those who cancelled the Crescent deal.”

NIOC has already lost another office in Rotterdam as part of enforcement actions, leaving the company without any active offices in Europe.

UN nuclear chief says military action cannot destroy Iran nuclear program

Oct 5, 2025, 17:05 GMT+1

Military strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites would have only short-term effects and fail to destroy its capabilities, the UN atomic watchdog chief said, urging diplomacy as the sole path to a lasting solution to concerns over Tehran’s disputed nuclear program.

"One thing is clear to me, to Iran, and to those who attacked Iran: a lasting, permanent solution to this situation and to the doubts surrounding Iran’s nuclear program can only be diplomatic," Rafael Grossi said on a podcast hosted by Colombia’s Innovation for Development Foundation on Friday.

"Although attacks or military action may have short-term effects, the technical and technological capabilities exist — what was destroyed can be rebuilt," he added.

"I always remind all the parties involved that beyond missiles and bombs, the only lasting solution will have to be some form of new agreement to restore lost trust.”

Talks between Tehran and Western powers over the country's nuclear program remain stalled.

A sixth round of indirect US-Iran talks was suspended in June after Israel and the United States struck Iranian nuclear facilities, prompting waves of Iranian missile retaliation against Israel.

A preliminary US Defense Intelligence Agency assessment found the strikes may have delayed Iran’s nuclear program by only a few months, according to a report by Reuters.

However, US President Donald Trump has consistently said Iran’s nuclear facilities targeted in the attacks were “totally obliterated.”

In a confidential report leaked to reporters last month, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran's stock of near-weapons grade uranium had increased almost eight percent before Israel attacked its nuclear facilities on June 13.

The report shows Iran had 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched up to 60%, marking a 7.9% increase since the UN nuclear watchdog’s previous report in May.

Iran insists its nuclear program is for civilian use and denies pursuing the development or acquisition of nuclear weapons.

Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul on Friday said Berlin wants a negotiated solution to limit Iran’s nuclear program after the reimposition of United Nations sanctions.

The UN sanctions on Iran were reinstated on September 28 after the UK, France, and Germany (the E3) triggered the snapback mechanism under the 2015 nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA).

The E3 said the decision followed “Iran rejecting two offers put on the table by the JCPoA coordinator in 2022 and further expanding its nuclear activities in clear breach of its JCPoA commitments.”

Iran has blamed the failure of the talks on what it calls Western powers’ “excessive demands.”

Tehran pins hopes on Russia and China to blunt sanctions impact

Oct 4, 2025, 16:25 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee

With Russia’s UN Security Council presidency and China’s economic leverage, Tehran is betting Moscow and Beijing can shield it from the impact of UN sanctions through legal maneuvers, committee vetoes, and strategic investments.

Both countries have condemned the Council’s decision, leading some in Iran to hope the rhetorical rejection will be followed by action.

“China and Russia currently intend either not to implement the resolutions under Resolution 2231 or to apply them selectively,” political analyst Mehdi Kharatian said in a post on X.

Former diplomat Kourosh Ahmadi put forward ways in which the duo could help Iran.

“China and Russia can play an effective role in reducing the impact of reinstated UN resolutions in three areas,” he wrote in the reformist daily Shargh, “preventing the implementation of the six reactivated resolutions, obstructing the work of the Sanctions Committee … and blocking any new measures.”

Obstruct sanctions

Ahmadi asserted that decisions in the Committee require consensus, enabling Beijing and Moscow to delay appointments, hinder panel functions, and limit enforcement—as they did on occasion in relation to North Korea.

Another former diplomat, Nosratollah Tajik, struck a more hopeful tone.

“China and Russia… can use existing legal mechanisms within the United Nations to obstruct the implementation of sanctions,” he told moderate outlet Jamaran.

In a joint letter to the UNSC president on September 28, China and Russia, together with Iran, argued that the snapback move by the E3 (Britain, France, and Germany) was “inherently flawed both legally and procedurally,” branding it “null and void.”

Russia’s UN Ambassador Vasily Nebenzia declared on October 1: “We’ll be living in two parallel realities, because for some snapback happened, for us it didn’t.”

Invest in Iran

Alongside legal avenues, some experts asserted, Russia and China could also try to neutralize the sanctions with hard cash.

Conservative politician Mansour Haghighatpour said Tehran and China could be looking at a new chapter in their economic cooperation if China takes “concrete steps to invest in and finance Iran’s infrastructure projects using the digital yuan.”

Such a move would prove that Beijing “will not allow imposed obstacles to block the implementation of ambitious initiatives such as the Belt and Road Initiative,” Haghighatpour argued in a piece for the moderate daily Etemad.

The optimism has been invariably met with doubt and even ridicule from ordinary Iranians on social media.

“Russia and China did not invest in Iran when we only had the US sanctions—so now they don’t recognize UN sanctions?” one user commented on X.

Another posted: “China buys only a small amount of oil from Iran … and it forces Iran to barter with Chinese goods! Humiliation higher than this?!”

‘They didn’t even abstain’

Bloomberg reported this week that Qingdao Port, a major Chinese oil terminal, plans measures targeting vessels transporting sanctioned Iranian oil, highlighting the limits of Beijing’s support.

Iran has signed strategic partnership treaties with Russia, a 20-year pact that took effect on October 2, and with China, a 25-year deal agreed in 2021 but still only partly implemented.

Some in Tehran are betting on these agreements.

“We are witnessing the emergence of a trilateral strategic partnership among Iran, Russia, and China, which could have significant implications for the balance of power,” academic Jalal Dehghani told the state-run Iran newspaper.

Another anonymous user on X reminded him of ominous precedents: “Russia and China voted in favor of all the sanctions resolutions between 2006 and 2011 … They didn’t even abstain!”

Australia, New Zealand to implement revived UN sanctions on Iran

Oct 4, 2025, 09:25 GMT+1

Australia and New Zealand said they will implement revived United Nations sanctions on Iran, officials told Iran International, backing a decision by France, Germany and Britain to trigger the snapback mechanism over Tehran’s nuclear program.

“Australia supports the decision of France, Germany and the UK (the E3) to trigger the ‘snapback’ mechanism under UN Security Council Resolution 2231,” a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson told Iran International.

The spokesperson said Iran must be held accountable for its “longstanding non-performance” of nuclear commitments under the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Australia called on Iran to return to talks and reach a diplomatic solution “which provides assurances that it can never develop a nuclear weapon.”

Canberra said it is obliged under international law to implement Security Council sanctions and will do so through amendments to domestic regulations, which may take time.

New Zealand’s foreign ministry said it was “deeply concerned” about Iran’s non-compliance and that work was underway on regulatory changes.

“As a UN Member State, New Zealand is bound to implement sanctions imposed by the UNSC,” the ministry said in a statement. “We advise New Zealanders to apply heightened due diligence in reviewing any ongoing transactions during this interim period.”

The United Nations sanctions, reimposed on Sept. 28, include restrictions on Iran’s nuclear and military activities, asset freezes on designated entities, and a duty to “exercise vigilance” when doing business with Iran.

Western powers say Iran left no choice

France, Germany and the United Kingdom said in a joint statement the reimposition of sanctions was unavoidable after Iran’s “persistent breaches” of the 2015 nuclear deal, citing enriched uranium stockpiles 48 times above agreed limits.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said the sanctions were a “serious mistake” by Tehran’s rulers that harmed ordinary Iranians, but added diplomacy was still possible. “Iran must never come into possession of a nuclear weapon,” he told Funke media group, urging a “negotiated solution to resolve this issue permanently.”

The European Union also reinstated sweeping restrictions this week on Iran’s oil, banking, transport and trade sectors. Tehran has rejected the sanctions as illegal and said all restrictions under Resolution 2231 must expire on October 18.

Canadian court blocks entry of former Iranian oil executive – Global News

Oct 3, 2025, 22:00 GMT+1

Canada’s Federal Court has upheld a government decision to block a former Iranian oil executive from entering the country, dismissing his appeal as baseless, Global News reported on Friday.

The ruling concerns Mohammadreza Mazloumi Aboukheili, 64, a former director of operations at the National Iranian Oil Products Distribution Company, a state-owned firm reporting to Iran’s Ministry of Petroleum.

He had applied for a visa to visit his son in Ontario, but Canadian authorities determined he was inadmissible due to his senior role in "a regime engaged in terrorism and systematic human-rights abuses," according to the court ruling.

Mazloumi had previously visited Canada before Ottawa introduced a 2022 policy targeting high-ranking Iranian officials, the court decision cited by Global News said.

Immigration officials argued his position placed him only two ranks below Iran’s oil minister, undermining his assertion that he was a “middle manager.”

Mazloumi challenged the assessment, but the judge rejected his arguments, saying the government’s decision was reasonable and supported by evidence. The court found “no error” in how the visa officer handled the case, noting the executive knowingly served in a government accused of terrorism and repression.

The case reflects Ottawa’s broader effort to prevent senior Iranian officials from entering Canada.

Almost three years after the policy was introduced, authorities have stopped nearly 200 suspected Islamic Republic figures at the border.

However, deporting those already inside Canada has proven more difficult. Only one suspected official has been removed to Iran, while several others remain in the country due to legal challenges.

Oil revenues play a central role in funding the Iranian state, which Ottawa has accused of supporting groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas and Yemen’s Houthis, and supplying drones to Russia for its war in Ukraine.

Canadian authorities have also accused Tehran of targeting critics abroad, including activists and journalists living in Canada.

Mazloumi did not respond to a request for comment, Global News reported.