Russia said on Wednesday that military action against Iran by its adversaries would be illegal and counterproductive to achieving peace.
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova told reporters that bombing Iran would not lead to a peaceful resolution and expressed Moscow's hope that upcoming talks between the United States and Iran could help avert a crisis.
Zakharova added that the world was weary of what she described as endless threats against Iran, and that Russia supported a sensible approach to resolving the dispute over Tehran's nuclear program.
Separately, the Kremlin called for a focus on diplomatic engagement rather than actions that could escalate tensions surrounding Tehran's nuclear program.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that Iranian authorities were taking preventative measures amid heightened rhetoric on the nuclear issue.

Iran’s president said Wednesday the country has never sought nuclear weapons, as officials marked National Nuclear Technology Day with a showcase of domestic achievements, days ahead of renewed talks with the United States.
“We do not want a nuclear bomb and never have,” President Masoud Pezeshkian said at a ceremony in Tehran. “We seek peace, security and dialogue — but dialogue rooted in dignity and independence. We will not retreat from our scientific and technological achievements.”
The president spoke at an exhibition of nuclear developments, where he inaugurated several new projects. He criticized Western powers for what he called leading the world into “war and destruction under the banner of civilization and peace,” and insisted Iran would not allow others to dictate its path.
Atomic Energy Organization head Mohammad Eslami said Iran was entering a new phase of nuclear development, including the production of medical radioisotopes and advancements in agriculture and power generation.
“Despite all threats and sabotage, our scientists are moving forward stronger than ever,” Eslami said.
In a separate statement, the Iranian parliament’s National Security and Foreign Policy Commission warned that “any threat to the peaceful nuclear industry will face a serious, decisive and destructive response.” The statement reiterated Iran’s right to nuclear technology under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
The comments come as Iranian and US negotiators prepare to meet Saturday in Oman for indirect talks focused on Iran’s nuclear program and potential sanctions relief. Tehran has signaled openness to diplomacy but remains wary of US intentions.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has said the talks are “a new opportunity for diplomacy” and the sole focus will be confirming the peaceful nature of Iran’s program in exchange for lifting what he called “cruel sanctions.”
The upcoming talks have drawn attention amid rising regional tensions and diverging views in Washington and Tehran on the path forward.
Iran's nuclear program has advanced to a stage where it could potentially enrich sufficient uranium for several nuclear fission weapons within weeks.
Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile remains under monitoring and verification by the UN’s nuclear watchdog, but the agency has no longer daily access to the Natanz and Fordow enrichment facilities.
Addressing a National Nuclear Technology Day ceremony, Iran's president said again that the country is not pursuing nuclear weapons, while stressing the need for nuclear science and energy.
"We are not pursuing a nuclear bomb. In this country, who has authority above the Supreme Leader? He has officially issued a fatwa declaring the construction of a nuclear bomb forbidden."
The president also addressed repeated calls for monitoring, saying, "They constantly say that we must have verification. You have verified a hundred times, verify a thousand times as well; but we need nuclear science and nuclear energy."

Iran's nuclear program has advanced to a stage where it could potentially enrich sufficient uranium for several nuclear fission weapons within weeks.
Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile remains under monitoring and verification by the UN’s nuclear watchdog, but the agency has no longer daily access to the Natanz and Fordow enrichment facilities.
An Iranian analyst described the upcoming talks between Iran and the United States in Oman as highly sensitive and potentially transformative, suggesting their primary aim is to resolve decades of hostility between Tehran and Washington.
In a commentary, Ahmad Zeidabadi said the Muscat negotiations, involving Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and US envoy Steve Witkoff, differ significantly from previous engagements, which focused on technicalities or were seen as delaying tactics.
He said the success or failure of the talks have immense consequences.
Zeidabadi said that US President Donald Trump's primary objective has two levels: first, to end the long-standing animosity and foster mutual cooperation; and second, if normalization is rejected by Iran, to neutralize technological and military capabilities that Washington perceives as a threat.
Iran's parliamentary National Security Committee warned on Wednesday that any threat to its nuclear program would face a serious response, coinciding with the country’s National Nuclear Technology Day.
The committee said Iran has the right to peaceful nuclear technology under the NPT, pointing to its numerous benefits and criticizing the IAEA for alleged bias.
It urged adversaries to abandon threats and fulfill promises, while calling on the IAEA chief to be impartial.

Whether direct or indirect, top diplomats from Iran and the United States are expected to meet in Oman on Saturday. The mere prospect of their presence in the same place at the same time has lifted spirits in Tehran.
While some hardline lawmakers in the Iranian parliament reiterated their distrust of Washington on Tuesday, public sentiment—particularly online—appears more hopeful.
Despite continued criticism of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and frequent jokes about President Donald Trump “breaking the ayatollah’s will,” the mood on social media suggests widespread excitement and a degree of optimism about the talks.
In one of the first reactions to the announcement, former lawmaker Ali Motahari said, “Many in Iran want direct negotiations, and opponents of the talks cannot stand in their way.”
He added, “Whether direct or indirect, participating in negotiations is a decision backed by the entire Iranian political system.” According to Motahari, “a majority of Iranians want an agreement between Tehran and Washington—an agreement that would lift the sanctions.”
Public criticism of hardline figures like Kayhan editor Hossein Shariatmadari, along with a rise in the value of the Iranian currency, appeared to support Motahari’s point. He told Khabar Online that “hardliners only want to make their presence felt; beyond that, they can’t actually prevent negotiations.”
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi echoed a similar message in remarks to state television. “What matters is ensuring that both sides are serious about negotiating,” he said, while emphasizing again that no arrangement has been made for direct talks.
The shift in tone among Iranian officials in recent days, including military chief Mohammad Bagheri—who expressed support for negotiations—has signaled a broader change in the country’s mood toward diplomacy.
Former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in a post on X, expressed confidence in Araghchi's leadership. “It is heartwarming to know that Araghchi is heading the talks for Iran. He is knowledgeable, serious, and committed to reaching an agreement based on national interests and mutual respect. Things will go well if the US delegation approaches the talks with the same seriousness and respect for Iranian interests.”
Zarif added: “Now it is the United States’ turn to cooperate in building a better future for the region and the world.”
Commenting on Trump’s decision to announce the Oman talks himself, Iranian journalist Niloofar Ghadiri noted in a post on X: “One of the main differences in this round of negotiations is that the first leak to the media came directly from the US president.”
Meanwhile, Mohammad Hossein Khoshvaqt—a relative of Khamenei and director of the pro-reform Fararu website—offered a provocative comment on X: “What would you say if you found out that Iran had launched a one-trillion-dollar project and hadn’t barred American investors from participating?”
In contrast, hardline daily Kayhan pushed back forcefully on Trump’s claim that a military option remains on the table if talks fail. “America is bluffing,” the paper wrote in its first article on the statement. “There will be no military attack. Any US military action would cause havoc in the region.”
The editorial added: “Even a limited military action will provoke Iran to destroy the Israeli regime.”






