A view of the nuclear water reactor at Arak, Iran December 23, 2019.
Iran can rebuild nuclear facilities hit by air attacks which would delay but not ultimately destroy Tehran's disputed program, expert on US-Iran relations Sina Azodi told the Eye for Iran podcast.
Iran can rebuild its capacities within six to twelve months of a strike, Azodi said, citing publicly available estimates which he said could undermine the rationale of an attack aimed at knocking out the program.
"Once you know how to make a car, it doesn't matter how many times you get into a car accident. You can still rebuild it," said Azodi, a lecturer at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University.
"If anyone's thinking about the military solution, they have to keep that in mind.
Iran denies seeking a weapon but the United States believes Iran's stepping up of enrichment levels to near weapons-grade means Tehran seeks that capability.
The United States assesses that Iran could rapidly build a nuclear weapon should it decide to do so, according to a November 2024 intelligence report which said there were no indications yet it was building a bomb.
Time may be running out for a peaceful resolution to the nuclear standoff.
The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post reported last week citing US intelligence findings from last month that Israel saw an opening for an attack on Iranian nuclear sites as early as the first half of this year.
Israel has repeatedly sought to thwart Iran's nuclear advancements through sabotage and assassinations, but Azodi said the program was barely set back.
"Last time around, when the Israelis had sabotaged the Natanz assembly line, we were told that Iran's nuclear program has been postponed by six months. But we saw that in a matter of three weeks or four weeks, Iranians began enriching at the same factory to 60% enrichment."
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has forbidden the development of nuclear weapons but a senior advisor said last year that an existential threat could prompt a reconsideration of the injunction.
An attack, Azodi said, could push Tehran toward a race for a bomb to guarantee its survival.
"If you're going to attack that program and you cannot destroy it in the entirety, you're giving Iranians more incentive to go for the ultimate weapon of defense, which means that you're going to have to launch an air campaign every few months to make sure that Iran doesn't get to that point."
Attacks on foes of Israel in the early stages of their quest for nuclear technology may not provide helpful comparisons to any strike on Iran, he added, as those efforts were centralized and in their infancy.
"The Iraqi and the Syrian cases were successful because their programs were not dispersed. They were very much in the initial stages of their nuclear journey," he said.
"But in the Iranian case, we have long passed that stage."
European Union foreign ministers will meet on Monday for a ministerial discussion focusing on Iran, Laurence Norman of The Wall Street Journal said on X, citing a senior European Union diplomat.
The agenda "will span Tehran’s support for Russia, its nuclear advances, its arrest of European citizens among other issues," the reporter said.
"First @kajakallas move to tighten EU stance on Iran," he added, referring to EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. Norman cited the EU diplomat as saying the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) will be one of five key topics discussed.
Last week, US lawmakers urged European leaders to reinstate strict United Nations sanctions on Iran, citing what they called Tehran’s continued violations of the 2015 nuclear deal.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Thursday said US President Donald Trump favors diplomacy over war but is determined to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Last month, the European Parliament adopted a motion for a resolution condemning Iran’s detention of European Union citizens, labelling the practice as “hostage diplomacy.”
The motion also called on the EU Council to take decisive action, including designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization.
Earlier this week, Iran said it charged a British couple on a road trip with espionage, in the latest detention of Western citizens by Tehran.
The United Kingdom is one of the so-called E3 European countries involved in ongoing talks with Tehran over its disputed nuclear program. Another, France, has protested Iran's continued detention of three of its nationals.
Iran said on Tuesday it seeks to more talks with Europe, according to foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, even as the prospect for negotiations with the United States dimmed.
US President Donald Trump favors diplomacy over war but is determined to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in an interview on Thursday.
“The president’s a peacemaker,” Rubio told independent journalist Catherine Herridge. “He’d prefer to avoid (war) and avoid those circumstances," adding that the United States under Trump “is not going to allow a nuclear Iran.”
Rubio did not discuss specific strategies but said that if Washington decided to act, “it could bring about the end of the Iranian regime,” in some of the most hawkish comments yet on Tehran from a senior member of the Trump administration.
Trump’s focus, Rubio said, remains on avoiding conflict.
As the world watches whether the US can achieve a deal with Moscow over the war in Ukraine, Rubio suggested the two countries may have a common interest in preventing Iran from becoming a nuclear power.
“There are things we could cooperate on geopolitically,” he said. “I’m not sure the Russians are fans of the Iranian regime having nuclear weapons.”
His comments come as US and Russian officials held their first discussions this week in Saudi Arabia on ending the three-year conflict.
Iran, which has sought stronger ties with Russia and China under Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s “Look East” policy, has faced economic strain due to US sanctions.
But Iranian media has warned that Moscow may not be a reliable partner and has raised concern that Russia could shift its stance.
Trump has criticized his predecessor, Joe Biden, for being too lenient on Iran and has reinstated the “maximum pressure” sanctions campaign from his first term.
While Trump has expressed reluctance to support an Israeli military strike on Iran’s nuclear program, he has also said he prefers a diplomatic agreement, a proposal that Khamenei has publicly rejected.
US intelligence reports cited by The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post indicate that Israel sees Iran as vulnerable after October 26 airstrikes, which reportedly US and Israeli leaders say crippled Iran’s air defenses.
Israel, the newspapers reported, perceives the US as more open to military action against Iran under Trump’s leadership.
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief said on Thursday it was prepared to help Iran prove it did not seek a bomb, in comments Tehran blasted as politicized and a boon to adversaries.
"We want to make ourselves available, providing technically sound alternatives to eliminate the possibility that Iran develops a nuclear weapon, to prevent Iran, or to help Iran prove that they don't want to develop a nuclear weapon," Rafael Grossi told reporters at Japan’s National Press Club.
"We hear the government say that. But as somebody said, we trust everybody, but we need to verify. So until we can have a very, very comprehensive watertight system of verification, we will not be satisfied."
Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon but the United States assesses that it seeks such a capability and Israel sees its arch-foe wanting a bomb to destroy it.
The Atomic Energy Organization of Iran issued a statement shortly after condemning Grossi's remarks as biased and inaccurate, saying "the burden of proof is on the claimant.”
"The IAEA director general, as a senior official of an important international organization, is expected to speak and act impartially, professionally, and without political bias," it said.
"At a time when the United States and certain Western countries are attempting to misuse the IAEA to exert unjust pressure on Iran, such politically motivated and unprofessional statements could serve as a pretext for their illegitimate ambitions.”
Time may be running out for a peaceful resolution to the nuclear standoff.
The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post reported last week citing US intelligence findings from last month that Israel saw an opening for an attack on Iranian nuclear sites as early as the first half of this year.
Iran is involved in ongoing negotiations with the so-called E3 European countries - Britain, France and Germany - who were signatories of a now largely defunct 2015 international deal over Iran's nuclear program.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said on Monday that Iran could fend off an attack by its enemies, after rejecting an overture from Trump for a deal over Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful but Israel insists aims at building a bomb.
JCPOA
Despite calling his recent visit to Iran constructive, Grossi said, “Iran is not still cooperating as we would like them to do.”
Grossi described a 2015 nuclear agreement, or Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as outdated and in need of a replacement albeit with a similar philosophy of Western economic incentives exchanged for Iranian curbing of enrichment.
"I discussed this with the foreign minister of Iran, Mr. (Abbas) Araghchi, maybe what you can have is the same philosophy of JCPOA, which is tit for tat. Which is, I restrain my activities in exchange for incentives - financial, economical or otherwise. But beyond this, I think it is no longer applicable," Grossi said.
"The JCPOA is an empty shell," Grossi added. "The JCPOA talked about one type of centrifuges but they have much more. They are enriching at 60% or almost weapon level, so it is a completely different nuclear program.”
The 2015 nuclear deal, signed by the Islamic Republic and six world powers, was aimed to limit Iran’s nuclear ambitions in return for sanctions relief. However, during his first term, US President Donald Trump withdrew from the agreement in 2018, reinstating sanctions.
In response, Tehran reduced its commitments, and in 2020, its parliament passed a law restricting IAEA inspections beyond the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
The conservative Tehran newspaper Jomhouri Eslami has warned Iranian authorities that Moscow may sacrifice Iranian interests in exchange for concessions from Washington over the Ukraine conflict.
Referring to US-Russia negotiations over Ukraine that began earlier this week in Riyadh—talks that notably excluded Kyiv—the newspaper speculated on Wednesday that these discussions could lead to a Moscow-Washington agreement. Such a deal, it argued, might see Russia securing territorial gains in Ukraine in return for granting Washington more leverage to protect Israel’s interests in the Middle East.
“Iran will be drawn into this equation alongside Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Palestine… and Russia will turn a blind eye to any actions the United States may take against Iran,” the newspaper wrote in an editorial titled “Us and the Great Moscow-Washington Deal.” This editorial has been widely covered by other media outlets in Iran.
The article accused Russia of failing to support Iranian forces in Syria in the past when Israeli jets targeted their positions and of collaborating with the US and Israel against Iran’s ally, Bashar al-Assad, when Tahrir al-Sham militia forces made advances against his troops.
Jomhouri Eslami warned that Moscow could betray Iran again if Washington helps Russia emerge victorious in Ukraine. The paper urged Iranian authorities to remain vigilant and strategize ways to mitigate the consequences of such a deal.
A similar concern was raised by the reformist Shargh daily in an article titled “Will Tehran Be Sacrificed in a Trump-Putin Deal?” The publication urged Iranian authorities to swiftly decide whether to pursue direct negotiations with the United States over its nuclear program.
Foreign relations expert Rahman Ghahramanpour, interviewed by Shargh, suggested that any deal between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin would first impact European nations that have supported Ukraine. However, he acknowledged that Iran’s position could become a bargaining chip in future discussions, given Moscow’s role in Iran’s 2015 nuclear agreement, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).
Meanwhile, Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov attempted to reassure Iran, stating in an exclusive interview with Iran’s official news agency (IRNA) on Wednesday that Moscow’s talks with the United States would not impact its relations with Tehran. Peskov confirmed that Iran’s nuclear program was mentioned in a February 12 phone call between Trump and Putin but insisted it was not a primary topic of discussion.
Peskov told IRNA that the cooperation between Iran and Russia was independent of the relations between the Kremlin and the White House. Peskov confirmed that Iran's nuclear program had been “mentioned” in the Trump and Putin’s phone call on February 12, but said it had not been a primary topic in the two presidents’ talk.
Iran faces a limited timeframe, as the European signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal could invoke the “snapback” mechanism in October, reinstating UN sanctions lifted under the agreement. In an interview with RIA Novostiast last week, Russia’s envoy in Tehran, Alexey Dedov, emphasized the importance of Russia and China in any nuclear negotiations, stating, “Without Russia and China, such discussions will not reach their goals and will remain unproductive.”
Trump has signaled a preference for striking a deal with Tehran but has also made clear that, failing diplomatic progress, he would not hesitate to consider military options to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Iran has sought to deepen ties with Russia and China in line with Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s “Look East” policy in the past few years. This approach, which hardliners have actively promoted, posits that closer relations with non-Western powers will bolster Iran’s development and resilience against US pressure and sanctions. However, economic sanctions imposed by Trump in 2018 have led to a deep economic crisis in Iran, without any decisive assistance by Russia and China.
Trump’s stance on the Ukraine war and the concessions he appears willing to make to Putin have been widely criticized by US politicians and media, including by some conservatives who fear that bypassing Kyiv in negotiations could have serious security implications for Ukraine and its European allies.
Iran has repaired damage to its air defenses from an Oct. 26 Israeli attack, a senior military official said on Wednesday, adding that Tehran would punish Israel and any power helping it strike Iran.
The remarks were the first official confirmation that the Israeli air attacks had damaged Iran's air defense systems but emphasized a hawkish stance which appeared to allude to US assistance to a future Israeli raid.
"The air defense of Islamic Iran is at the height of readiness, and the minor damage inflicted on it has been completely repaired," Mohammad Bagheri, chief of staff of Iran's armed forces was quoted by state media as saying.
His remarks were the third time in as many days that a top Iranian military official rebutted US and Israeli assertions that Iran was weakened by the bombardment and come after US media reported that Israel is mulling striking Iranian nuclear sites.
"The air defense of the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic is at peak readiness for offensive operations, and missile production is continuously being carried out with very high quantity and quality," Bagheri added.
The Wall Street Journal and The Washington Post reported last week citing US intelligence findings from last month that Israel saw an opening for an attack on Iranian nuclear sites as early as the first half of this year.
Visiting the White House this month, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the Israeli strikes had "crippled Iran's air defenses." Trump the next day said any reports of a devastating US-Israeli attack on Iran were "greatly exaggerated".
Israel is basing its assessment, the papers reported, on Iran's weakness after an Oct. 26 Israeli attack knocked out much of its air defenses and a greater perceived receptiveness to military action from US President Donald Trump.
"If the enemy makes any mistake, Israel’s security—and that of those involved in equipping and planning its operations—will be at risk, and the region will not see peace," Bagheri added.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said on Monday that Iran could fend off an attack by its enemies, after rejecting an overture from Trump for a deal over Iran's nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful but Israel insists aims at building a bomb.