The game has been designated as the tournament’s “Pride Match” by local organizers to acknowledge and celebrate the LGBTQ+ community.
The designation has no official standing with FIFA and was determined by Seattle’s local organizing committee. Still, the Iran Football Federation objected, as did Egypt’s. Iran’s football chief labeled the match’s designation an “irrational move that supports a certain group.”
That opposition is unsurprising. It represents a continuation of the Islamic Republic’s efforts to erase our community and deny our existence.
In Iran under the Islamic Republic, being LGBTQ+ can quite literally be a death sentence. Under Articles 234–239 of Iran’s Islamic Penal Code, same-sex acts between men can be punished by death.
I never came out publicly in Iran, but I didn’t have to. People could “sense” it, they’d say. The harassment, the threats and the fear were constant. I could have been arrested—or worse.
After fleeing to the United States, I began speaking out—mostly for those who still can’t. In June 2019, when New York City hosted WorldPride to mark the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising, I had the privilege of marching through the streets of Manhattan alongside my fellow Iranian queers and my family.
It was the first time WorldPride had ever been held in the United States, but for me it meant even more. After 23 years of living under an oppressive state, I was finally able to publicly and proudly be myself—both as a proud Iranian and a gay man.
From that day forward, I committed myself to using the privileges I have as an American citizen to amplify the voices of the Iranian LGBTQ+ community to the world. Our community faces severe legal and social discrimination, state-sanctioned violence and persecution, and unyielding efforts to erase our existence.
I quickly came to understand that it would be reductive to speak about the Iranian LGBTQ+ community outside the context of Iranian identity and Iranian politics. The two cannot be separated.
This is exactly why the 2026 FIFA World Cup has become such a charged and meaningful moment for our community. The news felt like a moment in which we could bring visibility to our plight on one of the world’s largest stages.
But the Pride Match represents only one controversy surrounding Iran in this year’s World Cup. Ahead of the tournament, FIFA made the decision to ban the historic Lion and Sun flag from all venues because it reportedly viewed the flag as “political” in nature.
That flag served as Iran’s official flag until the regime seized power in 1979 and replaced the Lion and Sun image with its current emblem. For millions of Iranians, including myself, the Lion and Sun is not a political symbol but one of cultural identity and resistance to a government that has never represented us.
Despite FIFA’s decision, dozens of brave Iranian fans defied the ban at the national team’s opening match, waving the flags proudly across SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles. While some fans displayed the flags without issue, others were stopped by security while trying to enter the stadium.
One young boy who was stopped said the flag “means freedom,” while another asked: “What do they expect us to do? Support a regime that we do not believe in?”
That question deserves an answer from FIFA. By banning the Lion and Sun, FIFA risked reinforcing the regime’s preferred narrative by treating a symbol many Iranians see as cultural identity as merely political.
The broader conduct of the Iranian Football Federation at this tournament should also give FIFA pause. The Iranian team’s send-off ceremony in Tehran was held at an IRGC-affiliated rally hosted by a sanctioned official who described the World Cup as a “war battlefield” and urged players to compete in memory of those who “stood by Iran’s missile defense systems and ballistic missile launchers.”
This is the organization whose preferences FIFA appears to have reflected when it banned the Lion and Sun flag.
Iran has now threatened to walk off the field entirely if it faces Pride symbols or dissenting slogans at the match, and FIFA has left local organizers to hold the line alone. Iran’s sports minister says they have been “assured that no disruptive incidents will occur in the stadium,” but it remains to be seen how FIFA will handle the situation during the match.
FIFA should avoid repeating that mistake. The Pride Match was intended to affirm visibility and inclusion, not to make a statement about Iranian politics.
For LGBTQ+ Iranians, that visibility is not symbolic. It is something they are denied at home under threat of imprisonment, violence and even death. Allowing that visibility to be erased on US soil would leave them wondering whether their existence remains negotiable when confronted by political pressure.
