Israel may resist US pressure over Lebanon pullback - Ynet

Foundation for Defense of Democracies chief executive Mark Dubowitz said on Monday that judgment on the Iran ceasefire deal should wait until its terms are known and tested over the next 30 days.

He said some critics had declared failure on the first day of the war, while others were declaring victory before seeing the agreement.

“The rest of us can acknowledge the extraordinary military achievements while reserving judgment until we see the deal itself—and what happens over next 30 days,” he wrote in a post on X.

US Representative Ro Khanna welcomed on Monday the ceasefire agreement with Iran and the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, saying Democrats should support the deal.

Khanna said the agreement could help bring down gas and food costs for Americans and prevent further loss of lives.

Japan welcomed on Monday the announced memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran on ending the war, calling it a major step toward resolving the crisis.

Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said Japan had actively pursued diplomatic efforts, arguing that the most important priority was to calm the situation as soon as possible.

She said Japan expected the MOU to be steadily implemented, free and safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz to be secured, and a final agreement on Iran’s nuclear issue to be reached as soon as possible.

Iran secured changes to provisions related to the administration of the Strait of Hormuz and added guarantees for Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity during the final days and hours of negotiations over a memorandum of understanding with the United States, Iran’s IRGC-affiliated news agency Tasnim reported, citing an informed source.

According to the source, issues related to the management of the strategic waterway were among the final elements revised in the text after proposals from Tehran led to changes in the draft agreement.

The source also said that language “guaranteeing Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial integrity” was added to the memorandum in the final hours of negotiations.

Tasnim reported that the inclusion of the Lebanon clause played a significant role in Iran’s decision not to carry out what it described as a planned military response to an Israeli strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs, known as Dahiyeh.

The source said Tehran viewed the provision as a concession benefiting Lebanon and one that helped avert further escalation.

A senior US official rejected Iranian claims that Tehran would receive billions of dollars in frozen funds before negotiations on a final agreement begin, calling the characterization a "spin."

Speaking to Axios, the official denied reports that Iran would gain unconditional access to $12 billion in blocked assets before the start of the 60-day negotiating period.

"This is completely not true," the official said. "This is a pay-for-performance deal and no frozen funds will be released without the Iranians implementing their commitments."

Iranian officials have said final negotiations will begin only after key commitments are implemented, including the release of some frozen assets and the lifting of the maritime blockade.