In a commentary published on Saturday under the title Hijab and the Second Step, Shariatmadari said some authorities were publicly condemning “semi-nudity” among women while neglecting to reaffirm that unveiling itself remains prohibited. “It is as if unveiling has been removed from the list of forbidden acts,” he wrote, “and officials only caution against full or partial nudity.”
“This is exactly the enemy’s second-step tactic,” he added.
Shariatmadari described the approach as part of a deliberate psychological strategy to desensitize society. “When society suffers from a harmful phenomenon, the enemy seeks to normalize it by introducing an even more disastrous version,” he wrote. “In this case, they present semi-nudity so that people tolerate unveiling.”
Since the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini in the custody of Iran’s morality police, enforcing compulsory hijab has become increasingly difficult, and the state’s ability to impose the rules has sharply eroded, particularly in major cities.
Since then, many women have continued to appear unveiled in public despite warnings, fines, and the return of hijab patrol vans, turning defiance into a daily act of resistance.
‘Officials still playing in the enemy’s field’
The Kayhan editor also repeated his long-standing criticism of the government’s handling of the hijab and chastity law, calling the legislation “suspicious” and “likely designed by infiltrators.” He said it “not only fails to stop unveiling but will expand it,” accusing the heads of Iran’s three branches of government of “preventing even the implementation of this incomplete law.”
Shariatmadari cited Khamenei’s earlier remarks that foreign enemies had deliberately turned the hijab issue into a political conflict. “They want to return the country to the pre-revolutionary state,” he wrote.
Addressing “semi-nudity” without confronting unveiling itself would embolden those seeking to erode Islamic values, he concluded. “Nudity is the result and continuation of unveiling,” he said. “Fighting it cannot succeed without a serious confrontation with unveiling.”