Iran is expected to deliver a formal written response to the latest US proposal on a possible nuclear deal within the next two days, IRGC media Tasnim news agency reported.
The response, to be conveyed through diplomatic channels, is expected to include Iran’s own proposal that maintains domestic uranium enrichment while addressing US concerns in exchange for effective sanctions relief, a source familiar with the matter told Tasnim.
According to the source, Iran will also signal its readiness to engage in further indirect talks with the United States, provided its red lines are respected.
Iran has formulated a series of steps in response to a possible resolution against the country by the International Atomic Energy Agency’s Board of Governors, warning that the response will not be increased cooperation, the foreign ministry spokesperson said on Monday.
“Iran has, from the outset, based its approach on engagement and cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency,” Esmail Baghaei said at his daily press briefing.
“Unfortunately, the Agency, under pressure and political influence from the three European countries and the United States, decided to prepare what it calls a comprehensive report. These three European countries are now misusing that report to draft a resolution and possibly push forward their planned agenda.”
“The response to confrontation will not be more cooperation,” Baghaei added.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry said there is currently no news about a new round of nuclear negotiations and criticized the United States for imposing fresh sanctions despite claims of easing them.
“The claim of halting sanctions was untrue, and new sanctions have been imposed,” the ministry spokesperson, Esmail Baghaei said. “This contradictory behavior shows the US is not serious and increases our suspicion.”

A member of Iran’s parliamentary National Security and Foreign Policy Committee expressed optimism about the ongoing nuclear negotiations, despite acknowledging challenges during earlier rounds of talks.
Fadahossein Maleki said: “Despite the fact that we do not observe a consistent policy in the statements made by Trump, and although the negotiations have faced challenges over the past five rounds, the overall trajectory remains optimistic.”
Maleki also accused Israel of seeking to undermine diplomatic efforts. “The Israelis are trying by any means to bring the negotiations to a dead end and ensure their failure, because Iran’s failure is Israel’s victory,” he said.
Iran will not bow to what it calls arbitrary political pressure over its nuclear activities, the country’s nuclear chief said on Sunday, as Western powers prepare to push for a resolution against Tehran at the upcoming quarterly meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors.
Mohammad Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), defended the country's uranium enrichment activities in an interview with Qatar's Al-Araby TV, asserting that nuclear development is Iran’s sovereign right and a pillar of national progress.
“We won’t jeopardize the health and lives of our people or halt our scientific advancements just to yield to unreasonable political demands,” Eslami said. “One million people in Iran benefit annually from our radiopharmaceuticals. Why should we risk that?”
Eslami’s comments come as the United States and three European powers — France, Germany, and the United Kingdom — consider introducing a resolution at the IAEA board meeting in Vienna, criticizing Iran for its lack of cooperation with the agency and alleged violations of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
The Iranian official accused the IAEA of losing credibility under what he described as the unilateral influence of the United States.

“Unfortunately, the agency has become a tool for American dictates rather than an impartial institution upholding international law,” Eslami said. “Countries cannot selectively dictate what others can or cannot do while expanding their own nuclear infrastructure.”
He emphasized that Iran is a committed signatory to the NPT and operates its nuclear program under the framework of its safeguards agreements. “We have no undeclared activities,” he added.
Responding to calls from Washington to halt uranium enrichment, Eslami dismissed such demands as both scientifically flawed and politically motivated.
“Enrichment is the starting point of any nuclear industry,” he said. “Without fuel, you cannot operate research reactors, produce electricity, or provide nuclear medicine. Iran is under sanctions, with no cooperation or support — even from the IAEA except in safety matters. So we had no choice but to develop the technology independently.”
Standing in front of the Tehran Research Reactor during the interview, Eslami pointed out that the facility was originally built by the United States and used 90% enriched fuel. “When they refused to provide us with 20% fuel later on, we had to produce it ourselves,” he said. “If we hadn’t, our ability to produce radiopharmaceuticals for medical use would have collapsed.”
Eslami said that Iran’s nuclear program remains transparent and peaceful, asserting that allegations of secret activities are politically driven. “There is no document, no evidence of wrongdoing,” he said. “This is about pressure, not proliferation.”
The IAEA board meeting is expected to convene in Vienna this week.
Iranian authorities say they have provided the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) with documents and information suggesting possible sabotage and document fabrication at two nuclear sites,Varamin andTurquzabad, during recent technical talks with senior agency officials.
According to Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, evidence shared during a visit by IAEA Deputy Director General Massimo Aparo in late May supports Tehran’s long-standing claim that contamination at the two locations may have resulted from deliberate tampering rather than undeclared nuclear activity.
Iran said its security agencies discovered indications of organized sabotage and may provide further documentation at an appropriate time.
The two sites—neither classified by Iran as official nuclear facilities—have been central to longstanding safeguards questions by the IAEA.
Tehran rejected the latest claims in the IAEA’s recent safeguards report, which include references to enriched uranium particles and alleged undeclared activities at Varamin between 1999 and 2003. Iranian officials described the new claims as unfounded, and based on forged documents, low-quality satellite images, and previously undisclosed allegations.





