Iran Expels Over Million 'Illegal' Foreigners in Past Year - Minister

Iran’s Interior Minister says the Islamic Republic has deported about 1.3 million foreign nationals over the past year as part of its ongoing crackdown on illegal migrants.

Iran’s Interior Minister says the Islamic Republic has deported about 1.3 million foreign nationals over the past year as part of its ongoing crackdown on illegal migrants.
Minister Ahmad Vahidi is urging the need for “legislative reform” to prevent the entry of unauthorized individuals, stating, "To block the entry of unauthorized foreign nationals into Iran, it is necessary to amend the relevant laws in the parliament."
Vahidi also said several of the deported individuals had managed to re-enter Iran, hinting that more stringent measures may be necessary to keep refugees out of the country.
Numbers from 2022 suggest that Iran houses one of the world’s largest refugee populations – with about 3.4 million reportedly living in the country.
Although specific details regarding the nationalities of those deported remain unclear, the majority of refugees in Iran are of Afghan origin.
The influx of Afghan migrants increased following the Taliban's return to power in the summer of 2021.
Iran’s own reports suggest that about 5 million Afghans currently live in Iran, though it’s unclear how many Afghans currently reside in Iran illegally. Estimates from the UNHCR say that around 780,000 registered Afghan refugees live in Iran.
Previously, Iranian officials have expressed their intent to deport at least half of the 5 million, citing a lack of necessary documentation for residency in the country.
Last year, the UNHCR renewed its non-return advisory to Afghanistan, advising against forcibly returning Afghan nationals, including those who are asylum seekers whose claims for asylum in Iran have been rejected.
Neighboring Pakistan has taken similar and extensive actions to deport Afghan refugees residing in the country.

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has delivered yet another anti-US and anti-Israeli speech, implicitly also attacking Saudi Arabia, saying that "Anyone who extends a hand of friendship to America and Israel is an oppressor."
The May 6 speech that was meant to be a guide for Iranians planning to go to Hajj pilgrimage turned out to be mainly about regional issues linked to the possible rapprochement between Saudi Arabia and Israel.
Khamenei obviously hoped that Riyadh would abandon plans to establish ties with Jerusalem after the Gaza war, but this was not what exactly happened due to mediation by the United States. Secretary of State Antony Blinken and CIA Chief William Burns's engaged in active diplomacy that took them to the region several times during the past months.
Referring to a term coined by his predecessor Ruhollah Khomeini, "Distancing from the infidels," which strained ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia and resulted in the death and injury of tens of pilgrims due to the chaos caused by Iranian government agents in Mecca during the Haj pilgrimage in 1987, Khamenei described this year's Haj agenda for Iranian pilgrims as "distancing from the criminal Zionist enemy and its supporters."
This marked a return to the hostile rhetoric that was softened by Khamenei when Iran resumed its ties with Saudi Arabia in early 2023 after seven years, in a China brokered deal between the two countries.
In his speech, while targeting Saudi officials and others, Khamenei contradicted himself by calling for "unity and communication among Muslims." This overlooks the fact that his and his predecessors' hostile remarks about the Saudis contributed to one of the most significant divides among Muslim nations in the contemporary history of the region. At one point, Khomeini expressed in anger that even if he were to make peace with his arch enemy, the United States, normalizing ties with Saudi Arabia would remain absolutely impossible.
Khamenei has also lashed out at Saudi Arabia several times making angry comments against the plan to establish ties between Riyadh and Jerusalem.
On a religious note, Khamenei's comments annoys Iranians who see the pilgrimage as a religious responsibility and do not want to make themselves pawns in yet another political game played by Khamenei.
Khamenei called Haj an opportunity for Iranian Muslims to communicate with other Muslims. This comes while his hostile policies and hate speech has left very few friends for Iran from among Muslim nations. At the same, once again contradicting himself, he called on Iranian pilgrims to ignore national, ethnic and religious differences among Muslims.
Meanwhile, while calling for friendship among the believers of Abrahamic religions he excluded the Jewish State by calling Israel "a blood sucker" and "a rabid dog." A few minutes later he attributed "blood sucking" to "Western civilization" adding another dimension to his hateful speech.
He said the United States was equally responsible for what happened in Gaza because of its all-out support for Israel. He further called Israel an enemy of Muslims and said the United States was its accomplice.
Khamenei also reiterated that Iran would lend its unwavering support to the people of Palestine and will not wait for others to join. He called on Iranian and non-Iranian pilgrims to support Palestinians. He also called on the pilgrims to rebel against tyrant rulers.
Iran is sending 87,550 pilgrims to Saudi Arabia this year starting from May 14 for 25 days.

Isfahan's Islamic Revolutionary Court has sentenced another dissident, Iranian social media activist Mahmoud Mehrabi, to death on the charge of "corruption on earth."
Mehrabi’s lawyer, Babak Farsani, said that the charge was issued without detailed justification from Branch 5 of the court.
The charges of "corruption on earth" and "Moharebeh" (waging war against God) represent the most severe criminal offenses under the Islamic Republic's interpretation of Sharia law, both carrying the penalty of death.
The government’s intelligence ministry, which usually takes charge of sentencing dissidents, has historically exploited the vague terms to target and silence them.
Prominent Iranian dissident rapper Toomaj Salehi was sentenced to death by the same court just last month – over his support for nationwide anti-regime protests in 2022.
In a recent statement on X (formerly Twitter), Farsani expressed hope that the country’s Supreme Court of Iran would consider the grave concerns raised in their appeal against the verdict.
In a video posted online, Mehrabi's sister said she was verbally informed by authorities of the execution order, and is urging the international community and the public to advocate for her brother and all political prisoners in Iran.
Despite limited information on Mehrabi's specific activities, it is known that he faced allegations of "spreading falsehoods on Instagram," "anti-regime propaganda," "incitement of military and law enforcement to abandon their duties," "promoting conflict and violence," and "insulting the Supreme Leader," as reported by the Telegram channel Human Rights Advocates.
Mehrabi first became entangled in the country’s legal system, which is not independent, when he was arrested in February 2023 and subsequently transferred to Dastgerd Prison in Isfahan.
He was briefly released on bail in April 2023 but was rearrested hours later at his parental home in Mobarakeh, after an operation by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard's (IRGC) intelligence agents.
This sentence comes amid an escalating use of the death penalty in Iran, following the unprecedented nationwide protests in 2022.
According to the Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), executions have more than doubled in the past two years, with 767 individuals executed in the year ending March 2024, highlighting an intensified crackdown on dissent within the country.

The head of the Iranian cyber police unit has introduced new measures to crack down on online activities that reportedly contravene Islamic, social, and cultural norms.
The latest measure will monitor the behavior of Iranian people in the digital realm, singling out anything that may be viewed as "moral and cultural offenses" by the regime.
This move is largely seen as a continuation of the authorities' renewed crackdown on women's hijabs, dubbed "Plan Noor." The so-called morality police have resumed their aggressive practices on the streets since April 13, targeting women refusing to cover their hair.
Vahid Majid, the Cyber Police Chief, detailed that the crackdown would target individuals involved in streaming “obscene” live content, producing “vulgar” materials, and engaging in online modeling.
According to Majid, an operation has already resulted in the identification and subsequent legal action against the operators, managers, and members associated with 10 pages and websites.
Built by the Islamic Republic, Iran’s internet has one of the world’s most comprehensive Internet censorship systems. While access to many popular websites and online services, including YouTube and Facebook is blocked, Iranians often find ways to circumvent restrictions. The regime routinely uses its digital network amid national protests to orchestrate Internet shutdowns and has also increased other forms of censorship.
The latest censorship of the digital realm coincides with recent actions by the cyber police to block access to several popular social media pages in Iran, as well as moves by the judiciary to summon and charge individuals over online comments.
Majid claimed that 91% of content he describes as "morally offensive" originates from Instagram, which, like other major platforms including Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, Telegram, and WhatsApp, is officially blocked in Iran.
Despite the restrictions imposed by authorities, a survey by the Iranian Students Polling Agency (ISPA) published in February revealed that a significant portion of the Iranian population continues to access these platforms.
Approximately 46.5% of Iranians are reported to use Instagram, 35.3% use WhatsApp, and 34.6% use Telegram, reflecting a robust engagement with social media despite governmental filters.

The head of the Iranian Sociological Association says that there is a profound gap between the state's ideology and the Iranian people's societal norms, calling the regime’s tactic of "homogenizing" society futile.
In an interview with reformist Jamaran News, Saeed Moidfar, the former Tehran University academic, underscored the Islamic Republic's repeated failures in imposing its desired lifestyle and compulsory hijab, which the people have fiercely resisted.
“Homogenizing is a project pursued by ideological states. They try to see everyone as similar; there is no longer any diversity in culture, values, norms, or lifestyles,” Moidfar explained. “The project has, of course, failed worldwide despite using force.”
Even with setbacks, the regime seems to persist in its attempts to revert the situation to pre-2022 protests, a move that the sociologist suggests is bound to fail as “norms or rules can be accepted if people agree with them.”
Following the wave of protests known as the Woman Life Freedom movement, during which at least 550 protesters were murdered by security forces, including dozens of children, the government took the morality police out of the streets.

Even in religious cities, many women now only partially cover their hair, wear heavy makeup and tight-fitting clothing, or even drop their headscarves altogether.
On April 13, however, the police launched a new crackdown against women called the Nour Initiative. Now, women rebelling against the hijab are the subject of morality police violence again.
Moidfar said that over the last three or four years, some parts of the state have not been concerned about the social consequences of their policies, actions, and plans. Hinting that they may be trying to maintain popularity among a minority that supports them, he said, “The reality is that a large part of society is going their separate way.”
It is possible to divide the minority Moeidfar divides into roughly into three categories: non-confrontational individuals, ordinary religious people, and hardliners.
Since President Ebrahim Raisi's administration took office 32 months ago, the situation has worsened for the ruling class. The president is now a hardliner, so Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei who essentially selected him, cannot attribute the deep economic problems to him, which was his strategy during ‘moderate’ Hassan Rouhani’s tenure.
Iran's economic situation has deteriorated, and inflation is officially at more than 52%, with food prices rising higher than ever.
Consequently, a section of society that avoided confrontation but whose red line was financial concerns does not appear to be content any longer.
In particular, they are concerned that nothing appears to be done to improve the economy. Khamenei’s strategy of looking to the East rather than the West has proven problematic. China is eager to buy discounted Iranian oil but wary of political ties, while Russia is tied to Putin's costly invasion of Ukraine. Instead of seeing an economic boost from ties to Russia, Iran is bound to another heavily sanctioned system.
The regime has desperately tried to overestimate the number of ordinary religious people to maintain its power, and its attempt to implement its ideology through force has even disappointed them.
During the latest wave of repression, more women from the "reformist" camp and religious backgrounds have joined Iranian protesters in demanding freedom of choice. A prominent Islamic scholar, Sedigheh Vasmaghi, 63, has stripped off her veil and publicly criticized Khamenei as a dictator and condemned the compulsory hijab law.
Another example is Mostafa Tajzadeh, who, in a letter from prison on Thursday, pointed to Khameni's responsibility for the recent crackdown on women, saying he has no clear strategy for addressing rampant inflation and has resorted to oppressive measures to silence public debate.
"Inflation, corruption, and oppression are turning Iran and its cities into a ticking time bomb," Tajzadeh wrote.

Mehdi Chamran, the head of the Tehran City Council, has defended a secretive two-billion-euro contract with a Chinese construction company for the purchase of electric buses.
Chamran said on Sunday that the details of the agreement were “confidential and its disclosure poses a security issue.”
He also claimed that the contract was executed under the supervision of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Central Bank. Chamran claimed that a similar contract was in place in 2017, suggesting that such dealings were not uncommon.
However, recent reports highlight growing concerns and criticism from city council members about the municipality's clandestine agreements with the Chinese company, aimed at importing transport and traffic surveillance equipment, among other items.
The contract, signed by Mayor Alireza Zakani, is expected to be funded by the proceeds from Iran's oil exports to China and the accumulated money there amid US sanctions.
During a January visit to China, Zakani confirmed that he had signed several agreements, including a 1.67 million euro deal in the transportation sector. Items listed in the deal include electric buses, vans, taxis, subway cars, and traffic cameras. Despite the disclosures, detailed specifics of the contract remain undisclosed, prompting urgent calls for transparency from Tehran city councilors and the media.
The financing of the contract has also raised eyebrows. Tehran's city government lacks direct access to substantial hard currency, which is typically controlled by the state. It is speculated that the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's office may have authorized the project.
Adding to the controversy, whistle-blower Yashar Soltani recently revealed on his website that the Chinese company tasked with importing public transport vehicles to Tehran is relatively new, established only in 2010, and highlighted "numerous violations" in the agreement with Tehran Municipality.





