A woman passes by a banner depicting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump day after the country held a national election, in Jerusalem, October 28 , 2026.
The departure of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could benefit Iran even if his successor maintained the same policies toward Tehran, Khorasan, a conservative Iranian newspaper close to Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, said on Thursday.
The newspaper said a change in Israeli leadership would not necessarily reduce military threats against Iran but could weaken the political and diplomatic networks Netanyahu has built during his years in power.
"Ultimately, Netanyahu's departure is in Iran's interest, not because his successor would necessarily adopt a friendly approach, but because removing one of the main architects of the confrontation with Iran would reduce the accumulated political and diplomatic capacity behind it," Khorasan wrote.
The assessment came after Israel's parliamentary election on Tuesday produced no clear winner, leaving Netanyahu and his main rival, former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, seeking support to form a government.
With nearly 86% of votes counted on Wednesday, Israeli broadcasters projected Netanyahu's right-wing bloc would secure 53 seats in the 120-member Knesset, compared with 48 for Eisenkot's opposition bloc and 19 for Arab-led parties.
Neither main bloc reached the 61 seats needed for a majority, leaving the outcome dependent on coalition negotiations.
Netanyahu's experience seen as key factor
Khorasan said Israeli political groups shared many positions on security matters despite their differences and that Eisenkot, a former military chief, was not opposed to confrontation with Iran.
It argued, however, that Netanyahu had built political and diplomatic networks over many years that a successor could find difficult to replace.
"Netanyahu is not merely a prime minister," the newspaper wrote, adding that he had developed extensive political, regional and international connections and considerable experience influencing US decision-making.
The newspaper said Netanyahu knew how to make Iran a central issue in Washington's foreign policy and connect security developments with political opportunities.
"Removing such a figure from the top of power, even if the basic structure of Israeli policy remains unchanged, means losing part of this accumulated capacity," it said.
"Netanyahu and his allies have built ties over the years between the Israeli government and some opponents of the Islamic Republic, particularly the monarchist movement," the newspaper wrote.
"Netanyahu's departure could weaken part of this political image, although one should not expect all these relationships to disappear with a change in leadership," it added.
It said political divisions within a future Israeli coalition could make decision-making more difficult, although such disagreements would not automatically reduce the risk of military action.
Election leaves Netanyahu and Eisenkot seeking coalition partners
Netanyahu's Likud-led bloc emerged ahead of Eisenkot's opposition in the preliminary results but remained short of a parliamentary majority.
Parties representing Arab Israelis were projected to secure an unprecedented 19 seats following high voter turnout, giving them a potentially important role in determining the next government.
Eisenkot could seek support from Arab-led parties to secure a majority, although several parties within his opposition bloc have opposed such cooperation.
Khorasan said the high turnout among Arab voters was one of the election's most important developments but questioned whether Eisenkot could reach an agreement with Arab parties while maintaining support from his existing allies.
Reuters reported that Netanyahu's electoral performance had strengthened his position in coalition negotiations despite the loss of his previous parliamentary majority.
The prime minister will remain in office in a caretaker capacity while the process of forming a new government continues.
Iran remains central to Israeli political debate
The election took place during the US-Israeli war on Iran, which began in February, with the possibility of further military action remaining an issue in Israeli politics.
Netanyahu has repeatedly emphasized the Iranian threat during the campaign and has received public support from US President Donald Trump.
Eisenkot has criticized Netanyahu's handling of security matters and warned against the political use of military decisions.
Khorasan said Netanyahu's departure would not necessarily bring a change in Israel's approach toward Iran, noting that different political groups shared positions on key security issues.
"Internal disagreements do not necessarily lead to a reduction in military threats," the newspaper wrote, adding that political competition could sometimes result in more aggressive behavior.
It said the removal of Netanyahu would not end the confrontation between Israel and Iran but could reduce the ability of Israeli leaders to coordinate political and diplomatic efforts against Tehran.
"Sometimes removing one player does not, by itself, end the game, but it can make the game more difficult for the opposing side," Khorasan concluded.
An elderly woman looks out of a window in her home in Iran.
As more Iranians build new lives abroad, many parents back home face a less visible consequence of migration: years without seeing their children, family relationships maintained through phone screens, and growing uncertainty about who will be there for them in old age.
For Maryam, a 68-year-old retiree in Tehran, that distance has become part of everyday life. Her son lives in Canada and her daughter in Germany, and she has not seen either of them in years.
“I know they're building their futures, and I'm happy for them,” she told Iran International. “But sometimes I just wish they were here, even for an ordinary dinner.”
Maryam says regular calls and photographs help her stay connected with her family, particularly her grandchildren. But watching them grow up from thousands of miles away is difficult.
“They know me through the phone,” she says. “I wish I could be more than just a face on a screen in their lives.”
Last winter, Maryam was hospitalized with kidney problems. Her children arranged help through relatives, and a family member accompanied her to medical appointments.
“My daughter was very worried, and I kept telling her everything was fine,” she recalls. “Sometimes, especially when I'm ill, I just wish we weren't so far apart.”
Caring for a spouse without the children nearby
In Karaj, 72-year-old Hamid has spent the past two years caring for his wife after a stroke left her with limited mobility.
Travelers pull their suitcases through an airport terminal in Iran, amid a continuing wave of emigration that has left many families separated across borders.
Their two sons live in Sweden and Australia. Although they call regularly and provide financial support, most daily responsibilities fall on Hamid.
He describes the exhaustion of managing medication, medical appointments and household chores.
“Some people think you're fortunate when your children live abroad,” he says. “But when your wife needs help getting out of bed, what matters is having someone nearby.”
The family has hired a part-time caregiver, but Hamid still handles much of his wife's care.
“Sometimes I want to tell my sons how exhausted I am,” he says. “Then I think about how far away they are and wonder what they could possibly do.”
Hamid does not blame his children for emigrating, but says family life has changed.
“We're still very close, and we talk all the time. But it's different when you can't sit together in the same room.”
Stay in Iran or join the family abroad?
For Nahid, a 64-year-old widow in Tehran, the question is whether she should leave Iran herself.
Her only daughter has lived in London for eight years and has encouraged her mother to move closer.
“My daughter tells me to come and live with her, but I've spent my whole life here,” she says. “My sisters, my friends, all my memories are here. At the same time, every year that passes, I wish I could be closer to her.”
Nahid worries about losing her independence in a country where she does not speak the language fluently or have an established social circle.
But staying in Tehran also means facing old age far from her daughter.
“I don't want to become a burden to my daughter,” she says. “But I don't want to leave behind everything I've built here either.”
The distance that remains
Phone and video calls have helped families separated by migration remain part of one another's lives despite years of living thousands of kilometres apart. They share news, celebrate birthdays and check on each other's health, sometimes communicating more frequently than families living in the same city.
But as parents grow older, that distance takes on a different meaning. A sudden illness, a medical emergency or the growing need for help with everyday tasks can expose the limits of even the closest long-distance relationships.
For children who have emigrated, Iran remains the place where their parents are growing old. For the parents who stayed behind, each passing year brings a difficult reality into sharper focus: the people they may need most are the ones living furthest away.
Women, some without headscarves, view artworks at Tehran Art Fair, held at the Iran Mall commercial complex in October 2026
As growing numbers of Iranian women appear in public without headscarves, authorities are pursuing organizers of cultural and sporting events over alleged violations of mandatory hijab rules.
Tehran’s prosecutor’s office announced this week that it had opened a case against the organizers of Tehran Art Fair, a privately run event held at the Iran Mall commercial complex from September 20 to 23, citing “failure to observe legal and religious requirements.”
The organizers have been summoned to court, while the fair’s ticketing website and social media account have been blocked on the prosecutor’s orders.
The announcement did not specify which activities at the event, which featured visual arts, music, theater and performance art, were considered violations.
Images and videos showed numerous female visitors without headscarves, as well as women performing without hijab.
In one performance, two women sat on the floor as red yarn was wrapped around them in a spiderweb-like pattern. Their bodies were then decorated with flowers before two other women cut the threads with scissors, freeing them.
Another video circulating on social media showed a woman in a long black dress that covered her body but left her head uncovered as she moved to music.
‘Offending public sentiment’
The action against the art fair came amid similar proceedings over Fitex Tehran, a sports equipment exhibition where women performed fitness routines and acrobatics to music without headscarves.
The judiciary announced Tuesday that an unnamed fitness blogger had been arrested on charges of “offending public sentiment” and “propaganda against the system.”
Videos of the performances, in which women wore long-sleeved tops and leggings but no headscarves, circulated widely on social media.
The prosecutor’s office ordered the event’s social media account closed for publishing “criminal content” and said an arrest warrant had been issued for one of the exhibition’s organizers.
The event drew criticism from conservative media. Tasnim, affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), condemned what it called widespread “deviations” at Fitex in an October 25 report and urged sports authorities and other institutions to intervene.
State broadcaster IRIB also described the event as an example of “deviance” and called for judicial action.
Beyond the exhibitions
Other cultural events have faced scrutiny over the past year, including music and theater performances and Tehran Design Week, held at the University of Tehran’s College of Fine Arts.
In some cases, judicial intervention has concerned interactions between women and men rather than hijab violations.
Last month, those involved in the play Tehran, Paris, Tehran/Bridge faced prosecution after a scene showed a female actor briefly resting her head on the chest of a male actor playing her brother.
The prosecutor’s office described the actors’ behavior as “contrary to tradition and propriety.”
Authorities have also taken action against venues hosting events attended by women without hijab.
Earlier this month, the IRGC-linked Fars News Agency reported that a banquet hall in the religious city of Qom had been sealed on the prosecutor’s orders after the wife of prominent soccer player Ali Daei attended a private company conference there without a headscarf.
A judicial case was also opened against the conference organizers, and the prosecutor warned that everyone involved would face action.
Changing streets, unchanged laws
Since the 2022 Woman, Life, Freedom movement, which followed the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, street-level enforcement of compulsory hijab has declined.
Increasing numbers of women now appear in public without headscarves, wearing clothing other than the long coats and chadors traditionally expected by authorities. Women also exercise in public parks without covering their hair.
But mandatory hijab rules remain in force, including in schools, government institutions and universities, while organizers of public events continue to face legal pressure.
Women’s rights activists and opponents of mandatory hijab argue that the growing visibility of women without headscarves does not amount to freedom of choice as long as legal restrictions remain.
The recent prosecutions show how authorities continue to enforce those restrictions through legal action against organizers, performers and venues, even as uncovered hair becomes increasingly commonplace in public.
US President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance point to the stage during Day 1 of the Republican National Convention (RNC), at the Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US.
US President Donald Trump confirmed he approved Vice President JD Vance's outreach to Iran, saying it focused on medical supplies, as Washington weighs a possible week-long military campaign against Tehran after next week's midterm elections.
Trump said on Wednesday that Vance had sought his approval to contact Iranian authorities but denied directing him to restart peace negotiations.
"They need help with medical supplies and various things. He asked me what I thought. I said, 'if you want to do that, that's OK,'" Trump told reporters.
"Basically, it's getting supplies in to help people that are not well," he added.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Vance had sent a letter to Mohsen Rezaei, secretary of Iran's Supreme National Security Council, seeking to restart negotiations between Washington and Tehran.
The diplomatic contacts come as regional mediators led by Qatar seek an agreement to prevent further military action, while US and Israeli officials prepare for possible strikes after the November 3 elections.
Vance seeks discussions on Iran's nuclear program
Vance's letter to Rezaei stressed that any negotiations aimed at preventing further US military strikes would require discussions on Iran's nuclear program, Axios reported, citing a US official.
The official said Vance had proposed contacting Rezaei, who has direct access to Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, and that Trump had supported the initiative.
"The President was enthusiastic about the letter," the official told Axios.
The Wall Street Journal reported that the outreach focused on exploring a possible framework for renewed negotiations rather than presenting a detailed peace proposal.
According to the newspaper, Vance had previously expressed reservations in private about prolonging the war, which began in February, while publicly supporting the US military campaign.
The vice president previously led US negotiations with Iranian representatives, but those efforts did not produce a lasting agreement.
A central issue remains Washington's demand for nuclear concessions before economic relief, while Tehran wants the US to lift its naval blockade, release frozen Iranian funds and allow oil exports before negotiations move forward.
Regional mediators led by Qatar, with support from Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey, are working to restart negotiations between Washington and Tehran, according to Axios.
Qatari negotiator Ali al-Thawadi visited Tehran earlier this week to discuss possible terms for an agreement with the Trump administration.
One proposal under discussion would allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) to visit Iranian nuclear facilities damaged during US and Israeli attacks in exchange for limited sanctions relief.
The arrangement could include waivers allowing Iran to export oil and the release of some frozen funds to purchase food and other humanitarian supplies, Axios reported, citing a regional source familiar with the discussions.
The proposals seek to address differences between Washington's demand that Iran give up its enriched uranium stockpile and Tehran's insistence that the US first ease economic restrictions.
"There is some movement. We are waiting for the Iranian response," the regional source told Axios.
The source said the proposed arrangement could allow Iran to retain its enriched uranium initially while Washington secured steps toward renewed nuclear oversight.
Trump confirmed to Axios on Wednesday that negotiations were taking place through mediators but said their outcome remained uncertain.
"We need to finish the job — either through a deal or another way — we will find out if negotiations can succeed," Trump said.
Qatari mediators also presented Iran with ideas for a seven-day process to address concerns on both sides, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing an official briefed on the negotiations.
According to the official, the draft calls for daily confidence-building measures from each side, with the process potentially beginning early next week.
Several countries would serve as guarantors of the agreement, the official said, adding that Iran was expected to respond by the end of the week.
However, a senior Iranian official told Reuters that Qatar had not presented a formal peace proposal but had instead put forward ideas Tehran considered unacceptable.
The official said Iran would show no flexibility on the nuclear issue.
Another option under discussion involves reviving a September 2025 agreement between Iran and the IAEA in Cairo that provided a framework for inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities.
The agreement was suspended after the UN Security Council reimposed sanctions on Iran the following month.
IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi told the UN Security Council on Tuesday that reviving the Cairo agreement could provide a basis for restoring inspections at facilities damaged during the war.
US and Israel prepare for possible week-long military operation
US and Israeli officials are preparing for possible renewed military action against Iran after the November 3 midterm elections, according to reports by Axios and the Wall Street Journal.
Axios reported, citing US and Israeli officials, that a potential military operation could involve a week of extensive strikes against Iranian leadership, energy infrastructure, nuclear facilities and other targets.
Israeli military chief Eyal Zamir spoke with US Central Command chief Admiral Brad Cooper on Monday to coordinate preparations for possible attacks, the report said.
The Wall Street Journal separately reported that Washington had warned several Persian Gulf countries to prepare for a possible short, intense military campaign following the elections.
The US military has been strengthening regional missile defenses, relocating personnel from vulnerable bases and replenishing munitions, according to the newspaper.
Additional naval and air forces are also being prepared for possible operations.
Trump has not made a final decision on further military action, the reports said.
Saudi officials have urged Washington to allow more time for negotiations before deciding on further strikes, Axios reported, citing a US official.
Saudi, Turkish and Pakistani security officials also discussed the situation during recent meetings in Tehran, according to the report.
مای ساتو، گزارشگر ویژه سازمان ملل در زمینه حقوق بشر در جمهوری اسلامی
Iranian authorities have executed at least 34 people in connection with the January protests, conducted mass trials resulting in death sentences and detained thousands, UN Special Rapporteur Mai Sato said Wednesday.
Addressing the UN General Assembly, Sato described the scale of human rights violations during her two-year Iran mandate as extraordinary. “I struggled to find its precedent in recent history,” she said, warning that her findings represented only a fraction of the abuses committed against Iranians.
Her report, covering February through August 2026 following the December-January nationwide protests, detailed how the Islamic Republic used the war with the United States and Israel to intensify repression, treating peaceful protesters as agents of hostile foreign powers.
In just one case, 34 defendants were tried in five days, with 12 sentenced to death and seven already executed. She said such proceedings could not establish individual criminal responsibility, rendering the death sentences arbitrary.
Sato said senior Iranian officials had publicly demanded expedited trials, while courts conducted mass proceedings and broadcast alleged confessions within days of arrests. She added that lawyers defending protesters had been summoned, threatened and, in some cases, arrested.
The special rapporteur also reported thousands of arrests on national security charges, with many detainees held incommunicado at undisclosed locations, a pattern she described as enforced disappearance. She said families of protesters killed in the crackdown faced threats of prosecution and asset confiscation for demanding accountability, while some were denied the right to hold funerals.
Sato also described prisoners left locked inside overcrowded cells during airstrikes, with bars reportedly welded to ward doors. Government-imposed internet shutdowns prevented civilians from receiving warnings about incoming attacks and made documenting abuses dangerous. Under Iranian espionage legislation, sharing information with foreign media can carry the death penalty.
She said the authorities continued withholding information about executions and killings by security forces while publishing protest death tolls far below independent estimates.
“The result is that there is no lawful way left to dissent,” Sato said.
The UN's Independent International Fact-Finding Mission, which addressed the same session, concluded that the suppression of January's nationwide protests amounted to crimes against humanity. Sato said she saw no reason to depart from that finding.
Iran and allies challenge UN findings
Iran's representative, Ali Karimi Magham, rejected both UN investigative mechanisms, describing them as illegitimate and politically engineered instruments unrelated to genuine human rights protection.
Russia accused the investigators of advancing Western political interests and disregarding Iran's “complex and unique sociocultural context.”
North Korea similarly rejected the investigations, accusing the UN of the “weaponization of human rights.” Its representative argued that countries should determine their own societal models free from external interference and that country-specific investigations violated national sovereignty.
China concentrated on the consequences of war and sanctions, urging respect for Iran's sovereignty and calling for the removal of unilateral economic restrictions. Beijing said such measures violated economic and social rights and worsened the population's hardship.
Sato responded to Tehran's objections by pointing out that Iranian authorities had engaged with her office throughout her mandate, including extensively over the war, while continuing to withhold information about killings carried out by their own security forces.
Western governments condemn Iran’s crackdown
Other delegations focused on the violations documented by the UN investigators, particularly the killing of protesters, executions and torture.
Britain described the killing of children during the January crackdown as “abhorrent” and condemned the torture of detainees, widespread violence against peaceful protesters and the authorities' internet shutdowns.
Australia accused Iranian authorities of using lethal force, mass arrests and a nationwide communications blackout to silence dissent and isolate Iranians from the outside world.
The European Union called for an immediate halt to executions, condemning the use of capital punishment and torture to suppress political opposition. It also warned about reprisals against critics, including those living abroad.
The Netherlands said the findings confirmed gross human rights violations, particularly a dramatic escalation in lethal force and mass arrests during the protests.
Canada raised concerns about proposed legislation that would criminalize contact with foreign organizations, civil society groups and diplomatic missions, potentially further restricting communication between Iranians and the outside world.
Sato also documented discrimination against Kurds, Baluch, Arabs and Azerbaijani Turks, alongside continuing persecution of Baha'is and Christian converts.
In her concluding remarks, Sato called on the United States and Israel to end hostilities and investigate their strikes, while urging Iranian authorities to halt executions and repression and investigate deaths caused by their forces.
Instead, she said, repression had deepened the grievances driving people into the streets.
