Iraqi Kurdistan president’s office confirms Barzani’s US-Iran backchannel role
Nechirvan Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq, met with Iran's then supreme leader Ali Khamenei during an official visit to Tehran on May 6, 2024
Iraqi Kurdistan President Nechirvan Barzani played a role in relaying messages between the United States and Iran and in efforts to ease tensions, a spokesperson confirmed to Iran International on Sunday.
The confirmation follows an earlier Axios report that the Trump administration turned to Barzani in May to establish a direct channel with the leadership of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.
“One of the consistent principles of Nechirvan Barzani’s policy is that problems and disagreements should be resolved through dialogue and negotiations,” spokesperson Dilshad Shahab said.
Shahab said Iraqi Kurdistan had maintained that position before, during and after the war.
“The Kurdistan Region of Iraq, before the war, during the war and afterward, has consistently emphasized that dialogue and negotiations are the only way to resolve existing disputes and tensions,” he said.
Shahab added that Iraqi Kurdistan had repeatedly stressed neutrality in conflicts, saying the approach had helped build trust among different sides.
A Kurdistan Regional Government official separately told Iran International that Barzani had been asked to play the role because of his good relations with both the United States and Iran.
Earlier in the day, Axios reported that US officials sought direct contact with the IRGC leadership after becoming uncertain whether Iranian negotiators Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and Abbas Araghchi spoke for the powerful force.
The report said then-Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard called Barzani around May 10, with the approval of President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, and asked him to contact IRGC commander Gen. Ahmad Vahidi.
Barzani spoke to Vahidi in a secure call on May 14 and asked whether the IRGC supported the position of Iran’s negotiators, according to the report.
“I fully support them and this is also the position of the IRGC. We prefer to solve this crisis through negotiations,” Vahidi said, according to a source cited by Axios.
The report said Barzani immediately relayed Vahidi’s response to Gabbard, who then briefed the White House.
Relatives of some of Iran’s most powerful security figures, including Mohsen Rezaei’s son, were among nine people tied to an oil-sales network that sources say failed to return about $11 billion in proceeds, an Iran International investigation found.
The major corruption network involved in the sale of Iranian oil has been operating within the Islamic Republic’s Intelligence Ministry, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.
The network was built around trusted intermediaries, known in Iran as “trustees,” who were given oil to sell as part of efforts to circumvent sanctions and were expected to return the proceeds to the state.
Iran International’s investigation found that the nine included the relatives of senior current and former officials, including a son of Supreme National Security Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei and the sons-in-law of two former intelligence ministers.
On August 9, the Iranian Labour News Agency (ILNA), quoting Hossein Samsami, a member of parliament’s Economic Committee, named one of the trustees who he said had failed to return Iran’s oil revenue: Hossein Aghayari.
A day later, ILNA provided further details, saying Aghayari was born in 1982 and operated in Tehran using Iranian and Afghan passports. It said he had purchased 40 Iranian oil tankers, taken delivery of 90 million barrels of oil, sold it on the market and failed to return the proceeds.
Aghayari has been based in the United Arab Emirates since before the start of the 40-day war. Two oil-industry sources told Iran International that five months ago, he stayed for several days at the Ritz hotel in London using a Dominican passport.
According to the sources, Aghayari’s name and details of his activities were deliberately provided to Iran’s domestic media as part of a security operation intended to conceal the identities of the principal figures in a much larger network of Intelligence Ministry trustees.
The sources identify the leader of the network as a senior Intelligence Ministry official known as Shayan, the ministry’s director-general for fuel and energy. He was dismissed 10 days ago and, according to three sources, is expected to be arrested.
The sources say the group, known as the Shayan Network, was responsible for about $11 billion in oil-sale proceeds not being returned to the state.
How the network operated
Since the administration of former President Ebrahim Raisi took office, Iran’s budget laws have allowed executive agencies and state, military and Social Security pension funds, in coordination with the Oil Ministry, to receive Iranian crude oil and gas condensate for sale as part of efforts to circumvent sanctions and return the proceeds to Iran.
The individuals and companies entrusted with selling the oil and transferring the revenue are commonly known in Iran’s political and economic terminology as “trustees.”
The administration of President Masoud Pezeshkian has continued to use similar mechanisms for oil sales.
According to Iran International’s sources, several large patronage networks emerged around the system, including one operating within the Intelligence Ministry through the cooperation of three figures.
One was Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad, who previously headed the Oil Ministry’s Fuel Supply Oversight Headquarters.
The other two, according to the sources, were the principal organizers of the alleged network. One was Shayan, the Intelligence Ministry’s director-general for fuel, who had previously served as a senior ministry interrogator in major oil cases.
Sources say that Shayan used his influence over cases ranging from the missing oil rigs scandal to the Crescent case to accumulate considerable wealth.
The third figure was Meysam Darzinejad Rami, director-general of the Intelligence Ministry Pension Fund, through whom the sources say legal cover was provided for the oil sales. He previously headed security at the Execution of Imam Khomeini’s Order (EIKO), the vast economic conglomerate controlled by the office of Iran’s supreme leader.
According to Iran International’s sources, Shayan and Darzinejad built an extensive oil-sales operation around nine influential trustees, one of whom was Aghayari.
Mohsen Fallahian, son of an ex-intelligence minister
One of the best-known members of the alleged network is Mohsen Fallahian, the son of Ali Fallahian, who served as intelligence minister under President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani.
Ali Fallahian has been widely accused of being one of the architects of the Islamic Republic’s campaign of assassinations against opponents abroad, including during the period when Shapour Bakhtiar, the last prime minister under Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, was killed in Paris.
Mohsen Fallahian runs a company in Iran called Sepehr Sanat Negin, whose stated business activities were changed to include oil and gas operations in October last year.
Iran International’s sources say Fallahian obtained authorization to establish an oil-storage facility at Shahid Rajaei Port in Bandar Abbas through his father’s influence and subsequently joined the Shayan Network’s oil-selling operation.
According to the sources, Mohsen Fallahian lives in the UAE and trades oil under another identity, “Mohsen A.,” using a Turkish passport. In one instance alone, the sources say, he converted 200 million dirhams in Iranian oil revenue into cryptocurrency and transferred it to a European country.
Ali Rezaei, son of Mohsen Rezaei
Ali Rezaei, son of Iran’s newly appointed security chief Mohsen Rezaei, is also identified by the sources as one of the Shayan Network’s trustees.
Rezaei is married to the daughter of Leili Boroujerdi, a granddaughter of Ruhollah Khomeini. For years, he served as deputy for communications at the Secretariat of the Expediency Discernment Council, effectively serving as his father’s deputy.
Iran International’s sources say Rezaei has for some time been living at the Address Mall hotel in Dubai, where he works as an oil trader. They allege that he is among the Shayan Network trustees who have failed to return hundreds of millions of dollars in oil-sale proceeds.
Ali Bayandorian, a trustee for several networks
Another member of the alleged network identified by Iran International’s sources is Ali Bayandorian, 52, who was born in Tehran and lives on Morvarid Street in Tehran’s Saadat Abad neighborhood, although he spends much of the year in the UAE.
The United States sanctioned Bayandorian in January 2020 over his links to Triliance Petrochemical, a Hong Kong-based broker that the US Treasury said facilitated sales of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products on behalf of the National Iranian Oil Company.
Iran International’s sources say Bayandorian sells oil and petrochemical products through a network of companies registered in Iran and Southeast Asia. They also allege that he handles financial transactions related to sanctioned oil sales and pays kickbacks to Shayan through an account in the UAE belonging to one of his wife’s relatives, a woman named Neda.
Before joining the Shayan Network, according to the sources, Bayandorian was a trusted intermediary for a network associated with the Supreme National Security Council.
Because he worked with several parallel networks, the sources say, he sometimes failed to pay Shayan’s share on time or in full. Shayan therefore created a rival for him: Ahmad Maroufkhani, chairman of the board of the Oil Products Exporters’ Union, whom the sources describe as one of the Intelligence Ministry network’s second-tier trustees.
Ehsan Sakhaei, son-in-law of Rouhani’s intelligence minister
Ehsan Sakhaei is another person identified by the sources as a trustee in the Shayan Network. He is 51, a Swiss citizen and the son-in-law of Mahmoud Alavi, who served as intelligence minister under President Hassan Rouhani.
According to Iran International’s sources, Sakhaei lives in Dubai’s Vision Tower.
Six years ago, during a Bank Mellat corruption trial, Sakhaei was accused of acting as a fixer who used his father-in-law’s influence to secure multibillion-toman debt write-offs for major bank debtors.
Iran International’s sources say Sakhaei has failed to return several hundred million dollars in proceeds from Iranian oil sales.
Ehsan Tahayori, son of an IRGC brigadier general
Ehsan Tahayori is a well-known Iranian currency dealer who, according to Iran International’s sources, failed to hand over $700 million in Iranian oil revenue in one case alone.
Tahayori, owner of the Arz Iran currency exchange, is the son of IRGC Brigadier General Shams-Ali Tahayor, also known as General Tahayori.
Iran International’s sources identify Tahayori as the principal suspect in a one-billion-dirham fraud involving Iran’s NIMA foreign-exchange system. They also allege that he was released and helped to flee with the assistance of the Intelligence Ministry.
Two sources told Iran International that authorities in the UAE arrested Tahayori during the war and that he is now in prison.
Photographs published earlier and reported to show his luxury cars at his villa in Lavasan had caused controversy in Iran.
Rouhollah Razavi, son-in-law of a Paydari Front spokesman
Another figure identified by the sources is Rouhollah Razavi, the son-in-law of Majid Mottaghifar, spokesman for the hardline Paydari Front.
Iran International’s sources say it was through this political connection that Razavi became one of Shayan’s trusted intermediaries and describe his office in Tehran’s Kamranieh neighborhood as a hub for backroom oil deals.
The sources allege that Razavi has retained more than $1 billion in oil-sale proceeds and provided information about rival trustees in an effort to push them out of the market.
Mohammad-Hadi Momenin, major bank debtor and oil broker
Another trustee identified by the sources is Mohammad-Hadi Momenin, born in 1989.
Iran International’s sources allege that Momenin controls approximately $2 billion in Iranian oil revenue that has not been returned. His name has appeared on the boards of more than 40 companies in Iran.
Last year, when the names of major bank debtors were released, it emerged that Momenin owed Karafarin Bank 743 billion tomans.
The sources say he fled the UAE for Oman during the war and later traveled from there to China, where they say he is refusing to respond to his creditors.
Ehsan Dastgheyb, son of Iran’s ‘Bribery King’
The ninth individual identified by the sources is Ehsan Dastgheyb, son of Abdollah Dastgheyb, a nephew of a former Shiraz Friday prayer leader who is known as Iran’s “Bribery King.”
Ehsan Dastgheyb lives in Dubai and sells fuel oil for the Shayan Network, according to Iran International’s sources. They allege that he, too, has failed to return a large sum of money to Iran.
Network comes under pressure
Following Shayan’s dismissal, Iran International’s sources say both he and Meysam Darzinejad Rami are expected to be arrested and that the network has come under increasing pressure.
The sources say the Shayan Network is only one of several networks of trustees involved in Iranian oil sales and estimate that intermediaries across these networks have collectively failed to return as much as $110 billion in oil revenue.
They also say Oil Minister Paknejad could soon be dismissed, although he has mobilized his political connections in an effort to remain in office.
Iran's oil minister Mohsen Paknejad
On July 24, Tehran prosecutor Ali Salehi said 59 cases had been opened against managers of trustee companies, with 43 reaching the indictment stage. He said 22 defendants had been sent to prison and that Interpol Red Notices were being pursued for 15 fugitives.
The prosecutor did not publicly identify the 15 fugitives, making it impossible from the announcement to determine whether any members of the Shayan Network were among them.
Iran International’s sources expressed doubt that the alleged network would be fully pursued, pointing to the powerful connections of those involved: they include sons and sons-in-law of former intelligence ministers, the son of the secretary of the Supreme National Security Council, and people connected to the Paydari Front and influential clerical families.
According to the sources, the Shayan Network alone was responsible for about $11 billion in Iranian oil-sale proceeds that were not returned to the state.
An Iranian military pilot gestures from the cockpit of a fighter jet in this file photo.
Qatar on Saturday dismissed the Iranian military’s claim that it had detained and held three pilots from two Su-24 bombers shot down in March, saying it recovered only one pilot’s remains and had invited Tehran to review the search.
Qatar’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Majed Al Ansari said in a post on X that Doha was “surprised by these misleading statements” amid ongoing diplomatic efforts to de-escalate regional tensions.
The denial came after Mohammad Bagherzadeh, commander of the Iranian Armed Forces General Staff’s committee for missing personnel, said three pilots had been captured alive and held by Qatar for about six months.
Bagherzadeh identified the pilots as Javad Salehi, Abdolmajid Dashtian and Omran Beh-Raveshian in a letter to the International Committee of the Red Cross published by IRGC-affiliated Fars News Agency.
Al Ansari said Qatari forces established contact with the Iranian pilots after they violated Qatar’s airspace and their targeting trajectory had been confirmed.
He said the pilots failed to respond to attempts to communicate and that Qatar then took “the necessary measures” to defend its territory in accordance with international law and its rules of engagement.
Qatar’s Defense Ministry said in March that two Iranian Su-24 aircraft had been shot down during an operation that reportedly targeted Al Udeid Air Base, which hosts US troops.
CNN reported at the time, citing two sources briefed on the operation, that Qatari forces warned the Iranian jets by radio but received no response before a Qatari F-15 engaged them and shot them down.
Qatar says one pilot’s remains were recovered
Al Ansari said Qatari search-and-rescue teams subsequently searched for the pilots’ remains.
He said Qatar coordinated with Iran to hand over the remains of one pilot who was found and invited an Iranian team in April to visit Qatar and review details of the search-and-rescue operation.
Al Ansari said Tehran had yet to respond to the invitation.
Iranian officials had previously said the fate of the three pilots remained unclear. Earlier this month, a senior Iranian Air Force official said authorities still lacked definitive information about them.
The dispute comes as Qatar remains involved in mediation between Tehran and Washington, with Al Ansari pointing to ongoing diplomatic efforts to reduce regional tensions.
File Photo: Shipping containers at Shahid Rajaei port in Chabahar, southeastern Iran.
Iran says its non-oil trade has fallen by around 30% since the war began, but figures from several of its biggest trading partners point to far steeper declines in some of the country’s most important commercial relationships.
Trade with China has fallen to roughly a quarter of last year’s level by one measure, while commerce with Turkey, India and the European Union has also contracted sharply as war and disruption in the Strait of Hormuz reshape Iran’s foreign trade.
Mohammad-Sadegh Ghanadzadeh, a senior official at Iran’s Trade Promotion Organization, said both non-oil exports and imports fell by roughly 30% during the first four months of the current fiscal year, from March 21 to July 22.
The government has stopped regularly publishing detailed foreign trade statistics since the war began, making a fuller assessment difficult.
Iranian customs data show the country recorded slightly more than $34 billion in non-oil trade during the same four-month period last year, including $15 billion in exports.
China trade plunges
China is Iran’s largest trading partner, accounting for roughly one-third of the country’s non-oil foreign trade.
Chinese data put non-oil bilateral trade at around $10 billion in 2025—substantially lower than Iranian figures, in part because the two countries classify and record parts of their trade differently, including sanctioned Iranian commodities.
According to Chinese customs records, trade with Iran totaled less than $823 million during the first four months of the war, from March through June. That is roughly one-quarter of the level recorded during the same period a year earlier.
The disruption has also sharply increased transportation costs.
Majidreza Hariri, chairman of the Iran-China Chamber of Commerce, said transporting goods from China to Iran by sea or land now costs four times as much as before the war, with shipping a container costing as much as $13,000.
Major partners hit harder
Trade with several of Iran’s other major partners has also contracted sharply.
The United Arab Emirates, Iran’s second-largest trading partner, has largely halted trade with Tehran. Before the war, annual trade between Iran and the UAE stood at around $27 billion, about 80% of it Emirati exports to Iran.
The precise impact on trade with Iraq, Iran’s third-largest trading partner, remains unclear. But official data from Turkey, its fourth largest, show Turkish exports to Iran fell by almost half between March and June to around $716 million, while imports from Iran dropped 37% to $907 million.
India has recorded a similar decline. Its exports to Iran fell by around 60% during the first four months of the war to approximately $150 million.
Indian imports from Iran moved sharply in the opposite direction, reaching around $1 billion in the first half of the year — four times the level recorded during the same period last year—after India bought several shipments of Iranian crude oil and liquefied petroleum gas.
Health Minister Mohammad-Reza Zafarghandi recently said India, Iran’s largest supplier of pharmaceutical raw materials, had stopped shipments after the IRGC closed the Strait of Hormuz.
He said India had made the resumption of pharmaceutical exports conditional on free passage for Indian vessels through the waterway.
Where has the trade gone?
Taken together, available data suggest Iran’s trade with several of its largest established partners has contracted substantially more than the 30% overall decline reported by Tehran.
The discrepancy suggests commerce with other countries may have partly cushioned those losses.
Russia, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan and Central Asian states are among the possible destinations, though the absence of regularly published Iranian customs figures makes it difficult to establish how much trade has shifted or where.
The broader picture nevertheless shows the economic fallout from the war extending well beyond Iran’s oil exports, weakening some of Tehran’s most important commercial relationships even as the full extent of the shift remains obscured by the lack of detailed Iranian data.
An Iranian child plays by the Strait of Hormuz as ships transit the strategic waterway.
President Donald Trump said he may soon declare the Strait of Hormuz US territory as shipping through the waterway nearly stopped and Tehran insisted it alone would decide when the strait opens or closes.
The Strait of Hormuz was unusually quiet Friday, with shipping traffic near a standstill. Hours later, as the day turned to Saturday in Iran, President Donald Trump said in New York that he may soon declare the strategic waterway “a territory of the United States,” drawing an immediate assertion from Tehran that the strait remains Iranian and under its command.
“Pretty soon I’ll be declaring the Strait of Hormuz a territory of the United States,” Trump said during remarks at the Police Academy Center for Training and Intelligence.
Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi responded that Iran would decide when the strait opened or closed and would continue what he described as its blockade until Washington accepted its “strategic defeat.”
“The Strait of Hormuz has been Iranian, is Iranian, and will remain Iranian,” Gharibabadi wrote on X, adding that the waterway would be “closed and opened under Iran’s command.”
Hormuz traffic nearly stops
The competing claims over the waterway came as actual traffic through it fell to extremely low levels.
Kpler data showed only two vessels passed through the Strait of Hormuz on Friday, with no crude oil shipments visible.
Nine vessels crossed Thursday and five Wednesday, compared with an August average of 12. More than 130 ships traversed the strait daily before the US-Israeli war on Iran began in February.
US Central Command said Friday that its forces had redirected 62 commercial vessels, disabled three and boarded two as of Aug. 14 while enforcing the US blockade against Iran.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said Thursday that the United States could maintain that blockade “indefinitely” by rotating ships in and out.
Oil prices also rose Friday as faltering efforts to end the Iran war and the prospect of an extended blockade kept geopolitical risks elevated. Brent crude gained 0.7% to $87.68 a barrel, while US crude rose 0.3% to $81.49.
Pressure grows as talks remain unsettled
Washington also kept up its economic pressure on Tehran. Trump highlighted Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s remarks on “unprecedented economic isolation” for Iran by sharing a Newsmax report on Truth Social. Bessent said Thursday that the United States would apply measures against Iran that had “never been seen.”
Canada added sanctions Friday on five Iranian officials over activities it said obstructed navigation rights in and around the Strait of Hormuz. Global Affairs Canada said the measures targeted senior officials, including members of the IRGC, involved in military, legal and communications activities linked to threats against the waterway. Tehran, meanwhile, stopped short of committing to renewed negotiations.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said Friday that no decision had been made to resume talks with Washington, semi-official ISNA reported.
He said Qatar and Pakistan were continuing to exchange messages and remain in contact with Iran, but stressed that this “does not mean negotiations.”
Araghchi also said the Islamabad memorandum of understanding referred to an “end to the war,” rather than a ceasefire, rejecting the idea that there was a 60-day truce requiring an extension. He said previous diplomatic channels were no longer effective and that Iran was working on a temporary path that could later develop into a final framework.
Pakistan continued to push implementation of the June 18 Islamabad memorandum, with Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar calling it the “only way forward.” Iraq also said Friday it was negotiating with both the United States and Iran to secure passage of its oil exports through Hormuz.
The waterway itself was nearly still Friday, but the dispute over who controls it was not. Washington is sustaining military and economic pressure, Tehran is asserting authority over passage through the strait, and neither side has yet moved back into formal negotiations.
Tehran is likely to wake Saturday to a new round of official and media reactions to Trump’s remarks on Hormuz, just as much of the West heads into a summer weekend.
Iranian children play football on the shores of the Strait of Hormuz as cargo vessels pass in the background, August 5, 2026
With a deadline to fully reopen the Strait of Hormuz only days away, parts of Iran’s media are increasingly treating any easing of tensions not as a return to normality but as a brief window to replenish essential supplies before the confrontation potentially resumes.
The debate comes amid speculation that the 60-day arrangement agreed with the United States could be extended by another 30 to 60 days, while Oman continues efforts to broker a temporary reopening of the waterway.
An ILNA report published less than a week before the deadline cited diplomatic sources as saying the atmosphere surrounding the talks had become more positive, though no final agreement had been reached.
The proposed arrangement would not constitute a broader political settlement, but a temporary de-escalation mechanism allowing commercial shipping to resume under monitored conditions.
One source described it as a “technical and security understanding,” with shipping lanes potentially restored in phases.
A ‘golden opportunity’
The possibility of even a temporary reopening has prompted debate in Tehran over how Iran should use what some commentators describe as a “60-day golden opportunity.”
Writing in the moderate Etemad newspaper, Hossein Salahvarzi argued that any easing of tensions would provide a narrow but valuable chance to stabilize trade after months of disruption.
Political de-escalation alone, he warned, would not restore normal commerce. Ships must be willing to enter the region, insurers must accept the risks, freight rates must fall and ports must be able to handle incoming cargo.
Salahvarzi urged authorities to prioritize imports of medicine, grain, livestock feed, critical spare parts and industrial inputs, warning that without clear planning, essential goods could remain stuck in bureaucratic queues until the window closes.
The argument reflects a wider sense of urgency in Iranian coverage, with any reopening increasingly portrayed as a temporary opportunity rather than the beginning of a durable return to normal trade.
ILNA similarly noted that even a short period of stability could reduce freight and insurance costs and ease pressure on essential imports.
Hardliners resist reopening
But the prospect of reopening Hormuz continues to face strong political resistance in Tehran.
Hardline lawmakers on Thursday dismissed the chances of arrangements negotiated with Omani and Pakistani intermediaries succeeding and insisted that the strait should remain closed.
Foreign Ministry officials have also publicly expressed doubts over whether the mediation will produce an agreement.
The competing positions expose a broader disagreement over how Iran should use its remaining leverage over Hormuz: whether to exploit a temporary opening to relieve pressure on its economy or preserve restrictions on shipping as a bargaining tool in negotiations with Washington.
ILNA said Oman had been mediating intensively on a temporary arrangement, while Persian Gulf Arab states, China and Pakistan were also pushing for de-escalation because of the disruption to regional trade.
“No country in the region benefits from a closed Hormuz,” the agency quoted a diplomatic source as saying.
Any agreement would nevertheless remain conditional and reversible, with deep mistrust between Tehran and Washington leaving it vulnerable to another military incident.
For those urging Tehran to seize the opportunity, that uncertainty is precisely the point. A temporary reopening would offer Iran a chance to replenish essential supplies and ease pressure on trade, but with little confidence that calmer conditions in the Persian Gulf will last.