• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

US says latest wave of strikes targeted six locations across Iran

Jul 14, 2026, 03:27 GMT+1

US Central Command says it completed its latest five-hour wave of strikes against Iran at 10:15 p.m. ET on Monday.

According to CENTCOM, the operation targeted military sites in Bushehr, Chabahar, Jask, Konarak, Abu Musa and Bandar Abbas, with precision strikes against coastal defense systems, missile and drone sites, and other maritime capabilities.

The military said the strikes were intended to further degrade Iran's ability to attack commercial shipping.

Most Viewed

What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future
1
ANALYSIS

What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

2

Iran sanctions reach education: Duolingo blocked, TOEFL and GRE in doubt

3

Poverty pushes Iranian children into hazardous border work

4

Iran court sentences 10 protesters to death in Isfahan

5

Iran arrests alleged financial intermediary over €300 million bank debt

Banner
Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Iranians hit back at VP's case for pricier gasoline as dollar passes 2.1m rials
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Iranians hit back at VP's case for pricier gasoline as dollar passes 2.1m rials

  • Nearly half in poll would not buy home in Iran even if they could afford it
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Nearly half in poll would not buy home in Iran even if they could afford it

  • Syria veteran emerges as key figure in Shahriar crackdown

    Syria veteran emerges as key figure in Shahriar crackdown

  • Iranians tell of shrinking paths to study abroad
    VOICES FROM IRAN

    Iranians tell of shrinking paths to study abroad

  • What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future
    ANALYSIS

    What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

  • Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing
    ANALYSIS

    Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing

•
•
•

More Stories

Iran risks its most valuable Arab partner over Hormuz

Jul 14, 2026, 02:56 GMT+1
•
Maryam Sinaiee
100%
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi meets Sultan of Oman Haitham bin Tariq Al Said at Al Baraka Palace in Muscat, Oman, April 26, 2026.

Iran's attack on facilities supporting US naval operations in Oman has plunged relations with one of Tehran's closest regional partners into their deepest crisis in decades, turning a dispute over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz into a direct military confrontation.

Relations deteriorated sharply after Iran's Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) said they had launched a "heavy and surprise attack" on logistical support facilities and aircraft carrier refueling infrastructure at the Omani port of Duqm on Sunday.

Oman condemned what it described as "irresponsible acts" and summoned Iran's ambassador in protest, marking a dramatic deterioration in relations between the two countries.

The military escalation appears to have followed the collapse of negotiations over a proposed framework for managing maritime traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.

According to a CNN report, Oman proposed maintaining the existing system for vessels using the southern shipping lane through Omani territorial waters. Ships entering Iranian territorial waters, however, would require Tehran's approval, though they would not pay transit fees.

The proposal appears to have fallen short of Tehran's broader ambition to assert greater authority over traffic through the strategic waterway, including a reported plan to charge ships for "management services."

Iranian officials confirmed that such discussions had taken place.

Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said he had discussed “management of the Strait of Hormuz and maritime traffic" with Omani counterpart Badr Albusaidi. Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei later confirmed the talks had failed, blaming US pressure on Oman.

"Our effort was to reach, through consultations with Oman, a mechanism that would ensure the safe passage of ships through the Strait of Hormuz. Unfortunately, because of overt and covert US pressure on Oman, this was not achieved," he said.

Tehran hardens its position

The collapse of negotiations was followed by increasingly confrontational rhetoric from Iranian military officials and hardline politicians.

On Tuesday, the spokesman for Iran's Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters warned that Iran's armed forces would respond forcefully to "any disruption or insecurity affecting commercial vessels and oil tankers by the US military outside the routes designated by Iran and without authorization from the armed forces."

He also warned regional states that "any cooperation with the United States and logistical support for its military will be regarded as a war against Iran's sovereignty and national security," adding that any wider conflict would engulf the region.

Ali Khezriyan, a member of parliament's National Security Committee, declared that Iran would pursue control of the Strait of Hormuz "with or without Oman." He warned that if Muscat failed to cooperate or secretly assisted Iran's adversaries, "its territory will not be safe from Iranian missiles."

Other lawmakers echoed the message. Ebrahim Rezaei said Oman should recognize Iran as the region's dominant power, while Mahmoud Nabavian argued that the IRGC should impose "exclusive management" of the strait, rejecting any arrangement requiring Iran to share authority with Oman.

Beyond Hormuz

Analysts suggested the confrontation extends well beyond the immediate military exchange.

Middle East analyst Ahmad Taqaddosi noted that Duqm sits on the Arabian Sea, outside the Strait of Hormuz, allowing US naval vessels to dock, refuel and undergo maintenance without entering the Gulf. Under a 2019 agreement, the United States has access to both Duqm and Salalah.

"From this perspective, Iran's claimed attack targeted not merely a port but part of the US Navy's operational rear base in the northern Indian Ocean," he wrote.

Energy analyst Abdollah Babakhani argued that the dispute ultimately reflects Tehran's fear of losing strategic leverage.

"Any mechanism that creates a permanent and independent route through Omani waters for the bulk of global energy trade could, over the long term, reduce Iran's geopolitical weight in Hormuz," he wrote, arguing that restoring the traditional shared shipping corridor would better preserve Iran's strategic position.

Debate inside Iran

Hardliners argued that allowing unrestricted passage through Omani waters while requiring authorization only for ships entering Iranian waters would surrender Tehran's leverage, insisting that management of the Strait of Hormuz must remain exclusively in Iranian hands.

Critics countered that Oman has long served as one of Tehran's most important diplomatic intermediaries.

One moderate commentator wrote: "The Strait of Hormuz is not our exclusive property. Oman's territorial waters are part of it, and Oman's wishes must also be respected. Claiming absolute control is adventurism and folly."

Others warned that another regional war could leave Tehran simultaneously alienating its own population, undermining relations with mediators such as Oman and Pakistan, and weakening its strategic position in the strait.

The confrontation leaves Tehran facing a strategic paradox. Its effort to convert military leverage in Hormuz into political control over regional shipping has pushed it into conflict with one of its closest Gulf partners while encouraging alternatives to the very influence it is trying to preserve.

Why so few Iranians have jobs despite low unemployment

Jul 14, 2026, 01:42 GMT+1
•
Mohamad Machine-Chian
100%
People walk in a crowded street in central Tehran in this undated file photo

Barely 37 percent of working-age Iranians have a job. Yet the government's official unemployment rate is only 7.5 percent. The gap between those two figures reveals less about Iran's labour market than about the way it is measured.

On paper, Iran does not have a jobs problem. A 7.5 percent unemployment rate is the sort of figure many governments would happily defend. But fewer than four in ten working-age Iranians are actually employed.

According to the International Labour Organization, the global employment rate is about 58 percent. Roughly six out of every ten working-age adults worldwide have a job. In Iran, it is fewer than four.

The explanation lies in how unemployment is calculated.

Of Iran's 87 million people, about 66 million are of working age. Around 24 million have jobs and two million are officially unemployed, meaning they are actively looking for work. The remaining 40 million are classified as economically inactive and excluded from the unemployment rate altogether.

That apparent contradiction rests on two statistical rules.

Anyone who worked for just one hour during the survey week counts as employed. A motorbike courier who completed two deliveries is counted alongside a salaried engineer with full benefits.

Only people actively searching for work are considered unemployed. Someone who searched for years before giving up disappears from the calculation entirely.

The more people lose hope, the healthier the official unemployment rate appears.

Not everyone outside the labour force should be counted as unemployed. Many are students, retirees or people who choose not to work.

Iran's own statistics provide some insight, although they have not published a detailed breakdown of the inactive population since 2017.

That census identified roughly 12 million students and 3.7 million retirees or people living on pensions or other non-employment income.

Retirement explains only part of the picture. Iran remains a relatively young country, with an average age of about 32 and only around seven percent of the population over 65.

  • A truce for the world, a reckoning for Iran’s economy

    A truce for the world, a reckoning for Iran’s economy

University enrolment has also fallen sharply—from just under five million students a decade ago to just over three million today—meaning fewer young people are remaining in education while waiting for jobs.

The largest category was around 20 million "homemakers." In Iran, women have outnumbered men at university for years, yet only around 12 percent of working-age women participate in the labour market, compared with roughly 50 percent globally. That reflects not only personal choice but also decades of bureaucratic and social barriers limiting women's employment.

Another 3.7 million people could not be clearly classified at all: they were neither employed, studying, retired nor looking for work.

Even before the latest conflict, Iran's labour market was deteriorating.

In the Persian year ending in March 2025, economic growth of about three percent produced 298,000 net jobs. The following year, the figure collapsed to just 34,000, while around 800,000 people left the labour force altogether.

The official unemployment rate nevertheless fell to 7.5 percent.

The forty-day war with Israel and the United States then dealt another severe blow. Deputy Labour Minister Gholamhossein Mohammadi says more than one million jobs were destroyed and around two million people became unemployed. Labour economist Hamid Haj-Esmaili estimates the true losses could reach between three and four-and-a-half million within months.

The International Monetary Fund expects Iran's economy to contract by 6.1 percent this year. Taken together, those figures raise a broader question: how can unemployment remain at just 7.5 percent?

Start with the government's own baseline: two million unemployed in a labour force of 26 million equals about 7.5 percent.

Now add only what the deputy labour minister himself acknowledges—two million newly unemployed because of the war. The unemployment rate immediately doubles to roughly 15 percent.

Use labour economists' higher estimates of wartime job losses and it rises to around one in four.

  • Iran’s negotiators have 60 days; its factories may not

    Iran’s negotiators have 60 days; its factories may not

The picture darkens further when considering the large number of people who have simply stopped looking for work.

Around 60 percent of Iranian workers are employed informally, without contracts or unemployment insurance. Of the millions believed to have lost their livelihoods during the war, only about 290,000 were eligible to claim unemployment benefits.

Even without counting every economically inactive Iranian as unemployed, it becomes increasingly difficult to reconcile an official jobless rate of 7.5 percent with the broader condition of the labour market.

Independent analysts estimate that, once discouraged workers and wartime job losses are taken into account, effective unemployment may now approach one in three people participating—or seeking to participate—in Iran's labour market.

Whether that estimate proves correct or not, the broader trend is unmistakable.

The government's headline unemployment rate increasingly reflects who is counted rather than who actually has work.

Historically, recessions push unemployment sharply higher. An economy expected to contract by more than six percent would normally produce a noticeable rise in joblessness. Yet many newly unemployed Iranians are likely to follow the same path as the 800,000 who left the labour force last year: stop searching for work and disappear from the statistics.

By March 2027, Tehran may still be reporting single-digit unemployment.

The more revealing figure may remain the one at the beginning of the story: barely 37 percent of working-age Iranians have a job.

Trump reinstates Iran naval blockade, notifies Congress of renewed fighting

Jul 13, 2026, 21:39 GMT+1
100%
CENTCOM handout map of Iran's Persian Gulf shores

President Donald Trump on Monday reinstated a naval blockade against Iran after notifying Congress that US military action against the Islamic Republic had resumed, amid fresh blasts in southern Iran and continued ship attacks near Hormuz.

Trump said Monday that the United States would once again block ships belonging to the Islamic Republic or serving its customers from entering or leaving Iranian ports, while keeping the Strait of Hormuz open to traffic bound for other countries.

US Central Command said the blockade would take effect at 4 p.m. ET on Tuesday and apply to vessels traveling to or from Iranian ports and coastal areas. American forces would continue supporting ships in regional waters that were not violating the restrictions, CENTCOM added.

The US Navy-led Joint Maritime Information Center said the measure would cover Iran’s entire coastline, including ports and oil terminals. Neutral vessels traveling through Hormuz to non-Iranian destinations would be allowed to pass, while humanitarian shipments would be permitted after inspection.

The announcement came days after Trump informed congressional leaders that “military action commenced on July 7 against the government of the Islamic Republic.”

In his July 10 letter which was released on Monday, Trump said US forces launched “defensive strikes” after Iranian forces attacked several neutral-flagged commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. The targets included missile launch sites, air defenses, maritime military assets, military-support infrastructure and command-and-control capabilities.

Trump said no American ground forces were involved and described the attacks as limited and measured. He nevertheless said US forces remained positioned to carry out further action, indicating that the July 7 operation marked the resumption of a military campaign rather than an isolated retaliatory strike.

The notification could further intensify a dispute between the White House and Congress over Trump’s authority to continue the war without legislative approval. Both chambers have voted to direct him to end the fighting or seek congressional authorization, while the administration says the president is acting within his constitutional powers as commander in chief.

US strikes have continued since the renewed campaign began. CENTCOM said American forces used one-way attack surface drones in combat for the first time on Sunday, striking a submarine and ship-maintenance facility at the Bandar Abbas Naval Base.

Three Corsair unmanned vessels hit the facility and degraded the Islamic Republic’s ability to attack commercial shipping, according to the US military.

Explosions in southern Iran

Fresh explosions were reported Monay across southern and southeastern Iran, within a coastal zone highlighted by CENTCOM.

100%
A map released by US Central Command highlights a broad stretch of Iran’s southern coastline along the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman, hinting at the general range of ongoing US strikes.

The state-run Islamic Republic News Agency said the sound of four missile impacts was heard near Konarak, with the blasts also audible in Chabahar and Dashtiari.

The IRGC-affiliated Tasnim News Agency reported six loud explosions in Chabahar and Konarak and said areas around Chabahar had been targeted by the US military in recent nights. It also reported explosions and the activation of air defenses in Bandar Abbas.

Iran’s state broadcaster later denied that explosions had occurred in Bandar Abbas, Larak and several other southern locations, contradicting earlier reports by IRNA and Tasnim. No immediate casualty figures were announced.

The confrontation also continued at sea, with Tasnim reporting that several vessels accused of violating Iranian restrictions had been targeted in the Strait of Hormuz.

Iran’s armed forces warned they would respond forcefully to US interference with shipping and said regional governments providing logistical support to Washington could be regarded as participants in the war.

Trump, meanwhile, declared the United States the “Guardian of the Hormuz Strait” and proposed charging the equivalent of 20% of cargo shipped through the waterway, a plan rejected by the UN’s shipping agency as lacking a legal basis.

Trump also said the United States would hit Iran hard on Monday night and Tuesday, in an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt.

Asked about the memorandum of understanding, Trump said it had been a test for Iran and that Tehran had failed to honor it.

Mossad recruited Ahmadinejad for Iran regime-change plot - report

Jul 13, 2026, 18:48 GMT+1
100%
Iran's former supreme leader Ali Khamenei (left) and then-president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

Israel’s Mossad recruited former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and chose him to lead Iran after a planned operation to overthrow the Islamic Republic, Haaretz reported Monday, citing more than 30 political, defense, diplomatic and foreign sources.

The relationship began taking shape in 2022 after the Mossad gathered intelligence indicating shifts in Ahmadinejad’s views, the report said.

Israel focused on his belief that Iran could not continue under sanctions and that its nuclear program had become a burden rather than an asset.

A team of Mossad agents continued a mission involving Ahmadinejad after landing abroad on October 7, 2023, and learning of the Hamas attack on Israel, according to the report.

Then-Mossad chief David Barnea personally oversaw the operation and at one point skipped a security consultation with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to focus on developments involving Ahmadinejad, the report said.

By early 2026, Ahmadinejad had become one of Israel’s most significant assets and was chosen to take power after “Operation Puss in Boots,” which was intended to overthrow Iran’s government, end its pursuit of nuclear weapons and install a new leadership.

According to the report, the wider plan included influence operations inside Iran, arming and training Kurdish forces in Iraq, mobilizing minorities, recruiting collaborators and creating a land corridor for militia movements. Israel also sought to draw Azerbaijan into the war.

The plan faced opposition from Military Intelligence chief Shlomi Binder, Research Division head Ofir Mizrahi Rosen and then-national security adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, the report said.

Three days before H-hour, the disagreements reached such a boiling point that IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir ordered everything halted. Nevertheless, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu decided to proceed.

The plan collapsed before Kurdish forces fired a single shot, the report said.

Ahmadinejad, a hardline conservative known for fiercely anti-Israel rhetoric, was Iran’s president from 2005 to 2013. During his two terms, he allegedly denied the Holocaust, advocated Israel’s destruction and suggested Tehran could develop nuclear weapons if it decided to do so.

After leaving office, he was repeatedly barred from standing in presidential elections. Over time, Ahmadinejad distanced himself from the political establishment and criticized the system under Ali Khamenei, accusing senior figures of corruption, mismanagement and failing the public.

He also adopted a softer public image, portraying himself as a defender of ordinary Iranians and their economic and social concerns.

Ahmadinejad’s current status is unclear. Last week, he attended a state-run funeral for slain Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei in Tehran, months after an alleged airstrike on his residence which, reportedly set him free from a house arrest.

UK says support for Iran's IRGC outlawed under new state threats law

Jul 13, 2026, 17:25 GMT+1
100%

Britain said on Monday it would designate Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and two other groups under new state threats legislation, making it a criminal offense to support or assist them if the measure is approved by parliament later this week.

The IRGC, the Iran-linked Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right and Russia's GRU Volunteer Corps would become the first organizations designated under the National Security (State Threats) Act 2026, which received royal assent last week.

The British government said people who support or assist the groups after they are designated could face up to 14 years in prison, while those carrying out sabotage, including arson, on their behalf could receive life sentences.

The designation is separate from proscription under Britain's terrorism legislation and is aimed at foreign state-backed activity including espionage, interference, sabotage and physical attacks.

The new powers would also allow prosecutors in some cases to bring charges without having to prove a direct connection to a foreign state, making it easier to prosecute people acting for designated organizations, the government said in a statement.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Monday his government “will never let Britain be a playground for states who want to spread fear, division and violence on our streets.”

“We have already taken tough action against the Iranian regime and those linked to it, and against Russian operatives and networks targeting our country,” he said. “These new powers will make it easier to prosecute and lock up anyone carrying out their dirty work here in Britain.”

The government said the Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right had publicly claimed responsibility for seven attacks this year on locations linked to Jewish and Israeli communities and Persian-language media in Britain.

The attacks included an antisemitic arson attack that damaged four Hatzola ambulances in Golders Green, north London, on March 23.

It said members of the IRGC's Quds Force were behind the organization and had “almost certainly” directed the group's attacks across Europe.

Britain's domestic intelligence agency, MI5, identified at least 20 potentially lethal Iranian-backed plots against people in the country over a one-year period, according to the government.

“Iran and Russia are using proxies and thugs to do their dirty work on our shores,” Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said, adding that those working for the groups would be tracked down and imprisoned.

The government also plans to designate the GRU Volunteer Corps, which it described as a group controlled by Russia's military intelligence agency and used to recruit people online to carry out hostile acts including sabotage, arson and harassment.

Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper called Iran and Russia’s use of proxy groups to conduct state-backed activity on British soil “reprehensible.”

“Their malign behaviour, and anyone who acts on their behalf, must be held to account,” she said. “We will take all measures necessary to protect the British people, at home and abroad.”