• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Lawyer of Iran Nobel laureate Mohammadi raises concern over prison conditions

May 5, 2026, 14:02 GMT+1

The lawyer for imprisoned Iranian Nobel Peace Prize laureate Narges Mohammadi warned her client faces a sharp deterioration in health and detention conditions, calling the situation unprecedented.

Chirinne Ardakani told a press conference in Paris that Mohammadi had been transferred more than 700 km from her home to a prison without a separate ward for political detainees.

“The degradation in her condition is unprecedented,” Ardakani said, adding the transfer appeared to be carried out “for reasons of reprisal.”

She also said Iranian lawyers have been denied proper access to Mohammadi and her case files. “They do not have access to the file and are refused direct contact with her,” she said.

Ardakani described Mohammadi as both a human rights defender and a journalist targeted for documenting repression, and said her family, including her children living in France, remain deeply affected by her detention.

Mohammadi, a prominent critic of Iran’s authorities, has been jailed for years despite international calls for her release.

Most Viewed

Pezeshkian brands IRGC escalation ‘madness’ as tensions rise in Tehran
1
EXCLUSIVE

Pezeshkian brands IRGC escalation ‘madness’ as tensions rise in Tehran

2
TEHRAN INSIDER

Abroad they talk, at home they hang

3

Trump says Iranian people must have guns to fight

4

Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

5

US intelligence sees limited new damage to Iran nuclear program

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Pro-regime graffiti in Los Angeles sparks concern in Iranian-American hub

    Pro-regime graffiti in Los Angeles sparks concern in Iranian-American hub

  • Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods
    INSIGHT

    Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods

  • Iran’s warnings give way to action as US launches Hormuz 'escort' plan
    INSIGHT

    Iran’s warnings give way to action as US launches Hormuz 'escort' plan

  • Iran secretly buries executed Swedish citizen at site linked to mass graves
    EXCLUSIVE

    Iran secretly buries executed Swedish citizen at site linked to mass graves

  • Abroad they talk, at home they hang
    TEHRAN INSIDER

    Abroad they talk, at home they hang

  • Who speaks for Iran: What the public rift means, and what it hides
    INSIGHT

    Who speaks for Iran: What the public rift means, and what it hides

•
•
•

More Stories

US will not pursue nation-building in Iran, Hegseth says

May 5, 2026, 13:41 GMT+1

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth said Washington will not pursue a nation-building effort in Iran, while adding that Tehran has killed large numbers of its own citizens.

“We’re not going to entangle this into some nation-building project,” Hegseth said at a Pentagon briefing.

He also said Iran’s government “killed 45,000 of their own people, innocent civilians.”

Hegseth said US objectives remain limited, focused on security and preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.

US says not seeking conflict with Iran as it deploys shipping protection mission

May 5, 2026, 13:24 GMT+1

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth said the United States is not seeking conflict with Iran as it launches a temporary operation to protect shipping in the Persian Gulf.

“We’re not looking for a fight,” Hegseth said, describing the effort as defensive and limited in scope.

He said the operation, known as Project Freedom, aims to restore the flow of commerce through the Strait of Hormuz and protect commercial vessels from Iranian aggression.

“Project Freedom is defensive in nature, focused in scope and temporary in duration, with one mission, protecting innocent commercial shipping from Iranian aggression,” he said.

Hegseth said US forces would not need to enter Iranian waters or airspace, adding the mission is designed to secure global energy routes and support international trade.

He warned Iran against interfering with shipping. “If you attack American troops or innocent commercial shipping, you will face overwhelming and devastating American firepower,” he said.

Hegseth added the operation would eventually be handed over to international partners, saying the waterway is more critical to the global economy than to the United States.

Iranian papers cast Hormuz escalation as display of power

May 5, 2026, 13:17 GMT+1

Iranian newspapers reacted to the latest escalation in the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on the United Arab Emirates with a tone of pride and vindication, presenting the crisis as proof that Tehran can set the rules in the Persian Gulf.

The coverage followed UAE accusations that Iran launched missile and drone attacks, including on Fujairah, as the United States moved to escort ships through the strait under President Donald Trump’s “Project Freedom.”

Some papers in Iran went beyond portraying the escalation as leverage and treated it as a moment of humiliation for the UAE.

The most striking example came from the ultraconservative daily Vatan-e Emrooz, which used a macabre pun to turn the UAE’s Persian name into a taunt.

The front page of Vatan-e Emrooz
100%
The front page of Vatan-e Emrooz

Instead of Emarat-e Mottahedeh-ye Arabi – the United Arab Emirates – it wrote Emarat-e Monfajereh, roughly “the Exploded Arab Emirates:” a wordplay that treats an attack on a neighboring country as a punchline and a boast.

Hardline Kayhan carried the message beyond the Persian Gulf, with a threat by its editor Hossein Shariatmadari: “Europe knows that we can, and we will strike.”

Javan, affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards, published a photo of the strait alongside an image of Alireza Tangsiri, the former Guards navy commander killed in March, with a quote attributed to him: “Because we are a superpower.”

JameJam, linked to Iran’s official broadcaster, used a cartoon of Trump trapped in the strait and struggling to open it. Its headline read: “Hormuz dead end.” The image captured a theme repeated across several papers: the United States as stuck, and Iran as the actor controlling the passage.

The front page of JameJam paper
100%
The front page of JameJam paper

Other newspapers used more formal language but carried the same message. Sobh-e No and Ettela’at ran headlines such as “Iranian order in the strait” and “Iran’s show of power in the Strait of Hormuz.”

Ettela’at wrote that any foreign armed force, especially the US military, would be attacked if it tried to enter the strait, and that only vessels coordinating with Iranian forces would be allowed to pass safely.

Farhikhtegan gave the confrontation an economic frame. Under the headline “Iran’s $30 billion is no longer hostage to the UAE,” the paper argued that the collapse of trade and currency ties with the Emirates could create opportunities for Iran.

The framing appeared to respond to reports that the UAE was considering freezing billions of dollars in Iranian-linked assets and targeting the shell companies and exchange networks that have helped connect Iran to foreign currency and global trade.

The paper described the UAE as a former “golden corridor” for bypassing sanctions, but said it had become a full adversary after the war. It also said that more than 80 percent of Iran’s currency settlements had been conducted through the Emirati dirham.

That framing is central to the front pages. The UAE is not portrayed merely as a neighboring country pulled deeper into the war. It is presented as the closest and most exposed partner of Washington in the Persian Gulf – a place through which Tehran can send a message to the United States, Israel, Europe and regional governments at once.

There were some more cautious voices. Donya-e Eqtesad set out possible scenarios ranging from a prolonged standoff to direct military confrontation or renewed diplomacy.

Yet even that more analytical treatment reflected the same basic reality: Hormuz has become the Islamic Republic’s main card in a war already extending beyond Iran, the United States and Israel.

US says Iran attacks below threshold for wider war in Persian Gulf

May 5, 2026, 13:13 GMT+1

The United States said Iranian attacks on shipping and forces in the Persian Gulf have so far remained below the level that would trigger a broader conflict, a senior US military official said.

“They’ve attacked US forces more than 10 times, all below the threshold of restarting major combat operations at this point,” said Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

He said Iran had also fired at commercial vessels nine times and seized two container ships since a ceasefire was announced, adding the actions were part of efforts to disrupt global trade.

Caine said around 22,500 mariners aboard more than 1,550 commercial vessels remain stranded in the Persian Gulf due to the disruption.

He added that Iran’s actions were affecting a key maritime route that handles roughly one-fifth of global oil consumption, with US forces working to secure shipping and maintain freedom of navigation.

Trump says Iranian people must have guns to fight

May 5, 2026, 13:11 GMT+1

Iranians need access to weapons to challenge their rulers, President Donald Trump said on Monday, arguing that protesters would fight effectively if armed but are currently outmatched by government forces.

“They have to have guns. And I think they’re getting some guns. As soon as they have guns, they’ll fight like, as good as anybody there is,” Trump said in an interview with The Hugh Hewitt Show.

Trump also suggested that US military pressure had already significantly weakened Iran and that further action could be completed within a short timeframe.

“We’ve taken out much of what we’d have to do, probably another two weeks, two weeks, maybe three weeks,” he said.

Trump said large numbers of Iranians would struggle to confront armed forces without access to weapons.

“You can’t have an unarmed population against people with AK-47s,” he said, adding that even hundreds of thousands of protesters would struggle against a smaller armed force.

He said previous protests had been met with heavy force, citing the deaths of tens of thousands of demonstrators, and suggested this had made him cautious about encouraging renewed unrest.

“I’m very torn on it, because they lost 42,000 people in the first two weeks. I don’t really want to see that,” Trump said.

Past weapons transfers

Trump said during a phone interview with Fox Sunday in early April that his administration had previously attempted to send firearms to Iranian protesters but that the effort did not reach its intended recipients.

“We sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them. We sent them through the Kurds. And I think the Kurds took the guns,” he said.

He repeated similar complaints, saying he was “very upset with a certain group of people” and warning they would “pay a big price.”

Several Kurdish groups have denied receiving such shipments.

  • Trump rhetoric signals shift toward conflict, experts say

    Trump rhetoric signals shift toward conflict, experts say

Calls in Washington to arm Iranians

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has also urged the administration to pursue a policy of directly arming Iranian civilians.

“If I were President Trump and I were Israel, I would load the Iranian people up with weapons so they can go to the streets armed and turn the tide of battle inside Iran,” Graham said in an interview with Fox News on Monday.

“We don’t need American boots on the ground. We’ve got millions of boots on the ground in Iran. They just don’t have any weapons,” he added.

Graham described the idea as “a Second Amendment solution,” suggesting that arming civilians could help bring down the government without direct foreign military involvement.

He also called for alternative channels to deliver weapons, urging the administration not to rely on Kurdish intermediaries.

Military pressure and internal divisions

Trump framed his comments within a broader assessment that Iran’s military and economic capacity had been significantly weakened.

“They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft,” he told The Hugh Hewitt Show.

Trump added that financial pressure may have affected the government’s ability to pay its forces.

  • Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

    Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

“We don’t think they’re paying their soldiers and their Guard anymore,” he said.

He also suggested divisions within Iran’s security structure, drawing a distinction between the regular army and other forces.

“We purposefully have not gone after them too much, because we think that they’re much more moderate,” Trump said.

At the same time, he said the United States was not seeking to dismantle the country’s military institutions entirely.

“We’re not looking to decimate the army,” he said, referring to past regional experiences.

“You know, when they did Iraq... and the worst thing was they got rid of the all the leaders, so nobody knew who the leader was. And then all of a sudden, you had ISIS. We don’t want to do that.”

Nuclear focus remains central

Despite discussing internal unrest, Trump said that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains the central objective of US policy.

“The one thing I will say is they will never have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Trump said any potential agreement would require the return of highly enriched uranium and limits on missile development, though he stressed that nuclear restrictions remain the priority.