Trump warns Iran of unprecedented military response over Hormuz mines | Iran International
Trump warns Iran of unprecedented military response over Hormuz mines
President Donald Trump warned Iran that it must immediately remove any mines that may have been placed in the Strait of Hormuz, threatening that failure to do so would trigger military consequences “at a level never seen before.”
"If Iran has put out any mines in the Hormuz Strait, and we have no reports of them doing so, we want them removed, IMMEDIATELY! If for any reason mines were placed, and they are not removed forthwith, the Military consequences to Iran will be at a level never seen before," he said in a post on his Truth Social.
"If, on the other hand, they remove what may have been placed, it will be a giant step in the right direction!"
US officials earlier told CBS News that Iran could be preparing to deploy naval mines in the Strait of Hormuz in a bid to further disrupt the vital shipping route.
According to the officials, Iran may use small boats capable of carrying two or three mines each to place them in the waterway.
While the exact size of Iran’s mine stockpile is unknown, past estimates have suggested it could hold between about 2,000 and 6,000 naval mines, many produced domestically or supplied by China or Russia.
The Pentagon said Tuesday that around 140 US service members have been injured during 10 days of ongoing attacks linked to the conflict with Iran.
Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said the casualties include eight troops with life-threatening injuries who are receiving the highest level of medical treatment.
“Since the start of Operation Epic Fury, approximately 140 US service members have been wounded over 10 days of sustained attacks,” Parnell said in a statement. “The vast majority of these injuries have been minor, and 108 service members have already returned to duty.”
So far, seven US troops have also been killed in Operation Epic Fury, according to official figures.
A strategic adviser to Iran’s parliament speaker on Tuesday appeared on state TV to reassure supporters of the Islamic Republic about Mojtaba Khamenei’s leadership credentials, saying he has long overseen military and security affairs amid criticisms that he lacks executive experience.
Mojtaba Khamenei "has always been particularly focused on military and security issues and has had oversight of them. The country’s war room is now being managed under his direction, presumably," Mahdi Mohammadi said.
"He is very well versed in running the country. For many years, state officials have met with him and reported to him on various issues. He is familiar with the details of the country’s affairs. There will be no disruption in terms of his ability to gain full oversight of the country’s matters. No shortcoming will arise," he said.
He also described Khamenei's son as "an open-minded and up-to-date" person who has "worked with young people".
The United States may be heading toward deploying ground troops, Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal warned on Tuesday after leaving a classified briefing on the war with Iran “dissatisfied and angry."
"There's also the specter of active Russian aid to Iran putting in danger American lives," he said.
The commander of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard naval forces warned that ships linked to what he called “aggressors” would not be allowed to pass through the Strait of Hormuz and have “no right” to do that.
Alireza Tangsiri wrote on X, “If you have doubts, come closer and test it."
Earlier, the Revolutionary Guards said Arab or European countries that expel Israeli and US ambassadors from their territories would have full freedom to transit the Strait of Hormuz starting Tuesday.
Two days after he was announced as Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei remains absent from public view, raising questions his swift selection was meant to pre-empt.
Supporters of the Islamic Republic have gathered in several cities to show loyalty to the new leader. The officialdom has congratulated him in unison. But Khamenei Jr is yet to appear.
There has been no speech, no televised address and very few photos or videos of the new leader. The only recording attributed to him so far is a short old video announcing that his religious classes have been canceled.
The lack of information has been so striking that even state media appears uncertain about how to present him to the public.
Older photographs have been circulated, stylized illustrations or AI-generated renderings have appeared online to fill the visual vacuum. These images are not presented as authentic photos but symbolic representations.
The situation raises a central question: what scenario may explain the unusual debut of Iran’s new Supreme Leader?
The simplest explanation is that the Islamic Republic intends to introduce Mojtaba through a carefully managed televised address or recorded message once security conditions allow.
In this scenario, the leadership transition would be framed as orderly and unified, with Mojtaba reiterating familiar themes of resistance, continuity and cohesion under wartime pressure.
Even so, the delay itself invites scrutiny. Authorities could cite security concerns, but the absence of even a brief recorded message—particularly after the steady stream of congratulatory statements from senior officials—has raised questions about the pace and choreography of the transition.
For now, the silence has only heightened curiosity about how and when the new leader will first address the public.
Mojtaba Khamenei greets Qassem Soleimani, former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force.
Scenario two: leadership by statement
A second possibility is that Mojtaba may initially govern largely through written statements rather than public appearances. Such an approach would allow the system to project continuity while limiting exposure during a volatile security moment.
Iran’s leadership has long relied on tightly managed messaging, and written statements attributed to Mojtaba could reiterate established positions while reinforcing the central role of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, which appears to wield growing influence over wartime decision-making.
State television has already described Mojtaba as a veteran of the “Ramadan war,” part of an emerging narrative that presents him as shaped by wartime experience. Under this scenario, his absence would reflect caution rather than weakness.
Mojtaba Khamenei (center) attends a religious gathering in Tehran.
Scenario three: managed vacuum
A third possibility is that Mojtaba’s continued absence reflects deeper uncertainty within the leadership itself.
The Islamic Republic is operating under sustained Israeli and US strikes, and the rapid announcement of his succession may have served primarily to prevent internal competition at a moment of acute vulnerability.
Another explanation is that Mojtaba may have been injured in the same attacks that killed his father and other senior figures—a scenario that would help explain both the speed of his appointment and his continued absence.
Naming him quickly could have forestalled rivalries among powerful factions while allowing the Revolutionary Guards and other security institutions to consolidate operational control.
In such circumstances, Mojtaba would function largely as a symbolic leader while practical authority remained concentrated within the security establishment, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in particular.
Presenting an absent or wounded successor could also suppress dissent by discouraging open criticism of someone portrayed as a victim of the same war that killed the previous Supreme Leader.
Mojtaba Khamenei attends a pro-government rally in Tehran, surrounded by supporters waving Iranian flags and anti-US banners.
Continuity and risk
Such a strategy, however, carries risks. If the leader continues to remain unseen for an extended period, public skepticism could deepen further, particularly among a population already wary of official narratives.
The lack of clarity may also reinforce uncertainty within the elite at a time when the system is under exceptional strain.
In the short term, projecting continuity appears to be the system’s priority. By naming a successor quickly, even if still absent, the establishment in Tehran may hope to signal stability to both domestic and international audiences.
Whether that image can be sustained, however, may ultimately depend on one simple question: when and if Iran’s new Supreme Leader finally appears.
The longer he remains unseen, the more his absence risks becoming a political fact in its own right—one that could deepen uncertainty at a moment when Tehran can least afford it.
