Violent protest crackdown has been part of Iran-US talks, Vance says


US Vice-President JD Vance said on Monday that Tehran's brutal crackdown on protesters has "already very much been part of the negotiations that we've had" and "I'm sure that will continue."
"We stand with the people of Iran. we stand with the right of peaceful protest across the world and certainly people who want to exercise that right in Iran," he added during a press conference in Yerevan, Armenia.
Asked about the US red lines in negotiations with Tehran, Vance said President Trump is "going to make the ultimate determination about where we draw the red lines in the negotiations."
"He doesn't announce what he's going to do in a negotiation because he thinks that it constrains him in private. He he's going to have a I think a lot of good conversations with his team and with others in the in the in the days and weeks to come."

The United States said in a maritime advisory that American-flagged vessels should remain as far as possible from Iranian territorial waters while transiting the Strait of Hormuz, after a ship was harassed last week amid heightened tensions between Washington and Tehran.
"It is recommended that U.S.-flagged commercial vessels transiting these waters remain as far as possible from Iran’s territorial sea without compromising navigational safety," the US Transport Department's Maritime Administration said in its statement on Monday.
"When transiting eastbound in the Strait of Hormuz, it is recommended that vessels transit close to Oman’s territorial sea," it added.
"If Iranian forces seek to board a US-flagged commercial vessel navigating these waters, the vessel’s Master should, if the safety of the ship and crew would not be compromised, decline permission to board, noting that the vessel is proceeding in accordance with international law, as reflected in the Law of the Sea Convention," the statement said.
"If Iranian forces board a US-flagged commercial vessel, the crew should not forcibly resist the boarding party. Refraining from forcible resistance does not imply consent or agreement to that boarding."

The killings that swept Iran last month revived memories of 1988, when the Islamic Republic erased thousands of political prisoners in silence—my brother, Bijan, among them.
While the world may see in the staggering death toll of the January protests an unprecedented explosion of violence, those of us who have spent decades seeking justice see something else: the chilling continuity of a regime that has only ever known one way to survive.
For us, the massacre of thousands of unarmed protesters is not a breakdown of the system. It is the system functioning exactly as designed.
The parallels with 1988 are as deliberate as they are haunting.
Back then, the Islamic Republic imposed a total information blackout. Prison doors were bolted. Phone lines were cut. Family visits were suspended without explanation. Families were left in torturous limbo, wandering from prison gates to government offices, met only with silence or lies.
Months later, the truth emerged in the most brutal form: a bag of personal belongings handed to a father, an order not to mourn, and the realization that a loved one was gone.
Today, the regime replicates that silence through digital darkness—a nationwide internet shutdown. But the scale has shifted. In 1988, authorities could intimidate families one by one. They ordered us not to hold funerals, not to cry, not to tell our neighbors. They believed that by hiding the bodies, they could hide the crime.
In 2026, the numbers are too large for secrecy to hold. When the reported death toll reaches 30,000 in a single week, grief becomes a tidal wave no blackout can contain. Familiar tactics of intimidation—extorting “bullet fees,” abducting the wounded from hospital beds, desecrating graves—no longer work as intended.
In 1988, the regime hid its atrocities beneath the soil of Khavaran. In 2026, in an unimaginable cruelty, it staged its terror in the open.
Videos that surfaced despite the shutdown shattered the nation: hundreds of lifeless bodies sealed in black plastic, lined along sidewalks and outside gray buildings like discarded refuse. Families were forced to walk these endless rows, performing a sadistic ritual of identification.
In one widely shared clip, a father’s voice trembles as he searches, calling out, “Sepehr, my son—my Sepehr, where are you?”
For decades, the Mothers of Khavaran—mothers, fathers, siblings, and children—refused to surrender to silence. They were the first to turn grief into political defiance. They wore white to funerals and memorials, rejecting the regime’s imposed black, the color of official sorrow.
White declared innocence. White rejected the legitimacy of the executioners.
They clawed at the dirt of Khavaran with bare hands, searching for truth even as Revolutionary Guards beat them and trampled their flowers.
That spirit has not vanished. It has evolved.
What we see today—mothers dancing at their children’s graves, distributing sweets instead of halva, clapping instead of wailing—is not denial. It is defiance. It is a refusal to allow a theocracy that has weaponized martyrdom for nearly half a century to dictate how death is understood. As one mother put it, our hearts are broken, but our spirits will not bend.
In 1988, impunity—enabled by an international community eager to close the Iran-Iraq war through UN Resolution 598—convinced Tehran that mass murder was an effective tool of statecraft.
Iran in 2026 is different. The world is watching in real time. The “Nuremberg moment” long urged by human-rights lawyers is no longer aspirational. It is necessary.
My brother Bijan and the thousands murdered in the dark summer of 1988 were denied even the pretense of justice: no trials, no headstones, no place in official history.
The Islamic Republic believed it was burying bodies. It was planting seeds.
Those seeds have now erupted. The legacy of the fallen is not buried in the mute soil of Khavaran; it lives in every young Iranian who stands firm before gunfire. We are no longer merely archivists of the dead. We have come to demand accountability.
History has never wavered on this truth: no tyranny is eternal. Their gallows will not save them from the dawn.

Mousa Ahmadi, head of Iran’s parliamentary energy commission, said on Monday the presence of US warships in the Persian Gulf would not stop Iran’s oil exports, according to state media.
Ahmadi said Iran had learned how to bypass sanctions over decades and would keep exporting oil even if all US vessels were deployed in the region. “The path we use to export our oil will continue,” he said.
He added that he did not expect major developments in the region and said there had been no official reports of Iranian oil tankers being seized in international waters.
J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series, offered condolences for Sina Ashkbousi, an Iranian protester killed during the country’s uprising, in a brief message posted on X.
“My deepest condolences to all who loved him. Rest in peace, Sina Ashkbousi,” Rowling wrote, resharing images of Ashkbousi.
According to the post, Ashkbousi “was a true Harry Potter fan, the kind who believed in magic because the world needed it.”
Mohammad Eslami, head of Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization, said Tehran could consider diluting its stockpile of uranium enriched to 60% if all sanctions were lifted in return, state media reported.
Eslami said the issue “depends on whether they lift all sanctions or not,” adding that any such step would be tied to guarantees on Iran’s rights.
“The export of uranium is not on the agenda,” he said, adding that suggestions attributed to other countries were “speculation” circulating in media content produced by pressure groups.
