Iran says it received US offer for new talks, and it is still under review

Oil prices held steady on Tuesday as traders weighed strong Asian demand and concerns over a potential breakdown in US-Iran nuclear talks against a cautious outlook for China’s economy, Reuters reported.

Brent crude dipped 6 cents to $65.48 a barrel, while US West Texas Intermediate rose 1 cent to $62.70 by 03:05 GMT.

Iran has "not accepted" Oman's invitation for a fifth round of talks with the US due to take place in Rome this Friday, the UAE's state-run The National website reported citing an Iranian official.

The American officials' insistence on "zero enrichment" has left officials in Iran uncertain about the usefulness of more talks, the report said.

Iran "does not want to have another round of talks and them to fail", the official was quoted as saying. "With zero enrichment, we don't have a deal."

"If the US attacks Iran, we won’t just target Washington — all its interests, bases, airspaces, seas, and territories used to launch an attack on us will be considered legitimate targets," said Mohammad-Javad Larijani, a former top advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader and an Islamic Republic insider.

“Right now, the US says don’t enrich uranium. A bit later, they’ll say don’t even learn physics or math. From their perspective, we probably shouldn’t work in the field of science at all — we should focus on music, dance, and singing instead.”

A third of Iran’s projected oil revenue for the year ending March 2026—worth $12.4bn—will go directly to the armed forces and military projects, three times more than last year.

The rest of the oil income, along with $33.5bn in gas revenues, will be split between the government’s budget, the National Development Fund (NDF), and the national oil company.

“The best course of action is to deposit all oil revenues into the National Development Fund,” the head of Iran’s planning and budget organization Hamid Pourmohammadi told a forum in Tehran on Monday.

“This way, we can determine at the start of the year how much the government needs, and based on that, the government can plan how much it can spend by year’s end.”

Pourmohammadi offered no detail on the existing arrangements which allow the fund to be bypassed and institutions such as the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) access a portion of Iran’s oil revenue before it reaches the government’s coffers.

He conceded, however, that the administration of moderate president Masoud Pezeshkian lacks consensus on how to implement the NDF-takes-it-all idea.

The NDF was established in 2010 to replace the Foreign Currency Reserves Fund (FCRF). While the FCRF was meant to safeguard oil income for future generations, the NDF has increasingly been used to cover budget deficits, despite the state objective of investing oil revenues.

The fund has long operated under the direct control of supreme leader Ali Khamenei, with administrations needing his approval for withdrawals.

One of Pezeshkian’s first moves in office was to request funds to pay wheat farmers.

In recent years, billions have been syphoned to the IRGC and the state broadcaster, functioning as main vehicles of Khamenei’s hard and soft power.

The NDF’s share of oil and gas revenues dropped from 40% to 20% in the two years ending December 2024, according to Didban Iran citing a deputy of Iran’s budget office Hamid Amani Hamadani.

Iran’s private sector owed $7bn to the fund in January 2025, according to senior NDF official Mehdi Ghazanfari. This is a debt repaid slowly in local currency, which the fund must convert to dollars at below-market rates.

Ghazanfari put the total pay-outs from the fund to the administration at just above $103bn in 12 years. He also said $45bn had been loaned to private-sector in the same period—often to firms with ties to the IRGC or the supreme leader’s office

As of May, the fund’s remaining assets stood at $30.7bn—dragged down by unpaid debts from both government and politically shielded companies.

"Let me be clear, we will not tolerate growing state backed threats on UK soil. The Iranian regime poses an unacceptable threat to our domestic security which cannot continue," Cooper told parliament on Monday.

"The UK will not accept any Iranian state threat activity in the UK."

The sharp statement comes after the arrests of Iranian nationals on UK soil this month in terrorism-related cases.

In two separate operations on May 3, eight men including seven Iranians were arrested by the British counter-terrorism police.

On Saturday, three of the Iranian nationals were charged with offences under the National Security Act, accused of acting on behalf of Iran’s intelligence service and carried out surveillance targeting Iran International journalists.

All three are accused of engaging in conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service between August 14, 2024 and February 16, 2025.

New counter-terror powers against IRGC

Meanwhile an advisor to the UK government on Monday recommended new powers targeting Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, as calls for the IRGC’s proscription have grown following the spate of arrests.

The UK government’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation Jonathan Hall published findings on Monday advising greater powers for ministers to designate people affiliated with the IRGC as terrorists.

Hall's report called for legislation proscribing public demonstrations of support for Iran's paramilitary organization such as displaying its insignia in public and recommended stiffer sentences for those aiding or benefiting from the IRGC.

The Revolutionary Guards cannot be blacklisted the same way non-state actors are, Hall argued, but he recommended its agents and supporters be targeted through a Statutory Alert and Liability Threat or Salt notice.

"It will allow the government to communicate decisive stigma at an international level for certain State and State-backed entities. Naming and shaming in a high-profile manner, accompanied by open reasons, can help address attempts at plausible deniability for serious harm caused to the UK or its allies," the report said.

"The Liability Threat Notice ... (puts the IRGC) on notice that its operations, and its minions and influence networks, are at greater risk of executive action, by way of arrest and prosecution, or deportation, or other forms of disruption, from UK authorities."

On Saturday, over 550 UK MPs and peers in an open letter urged the government to proscribe the IRGC as a terrorist group.