Iran can cut nuclear deal and still fight imperialism, IRGC-linked daily says

Recent comments by US envoy Steve Witkoff suggest that Washington's goals in the ongoing talks with Iran go somewhat beyond those of the 2015 nuclear deal negotiated under President Barack Obama—but without representing a radical departure.

Unpack the full analysis here.

The Kremlin on Tuesday declined to comment on whether Russia would be willing to take Iran’s enriched uranium as part of a potential future nuclear deal with the United States, according to Reuters.

The Guardian reported earlier that Tehran is expected to reject a US proposal to transfer its uranium stockpile to a third country, such as Russia, under a plan aimed at curbing Iran’s nuclear programme.

Russia was a signatory to the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, which US President Donald Trump withdrew from in 2018.

Iran's Supreme Leader has expressed a mix of cautious optimism and profound skepticism regarding the ongoing talks with the United States, dismissing the talks as only one of Foreign Ministry’s dozens of tasks.

"We are neither extremely optimistic nor extremely pessimistic about these talks," he said, adding however that “we are very pessimistic about the other side, but we are optimistic about our own capabilities."

Khamenei added, "Ultimately, it is a task and a move that has been decided upon, and the initial steps have been implemented well.”

Read the full piece here.

During a meeting with a group of senior officials, Ali Khamenei emphasized the need to avoid tying the country's issues to the outcome of these negotiations.

"We are neither extremely optimistic nor extremely pessimistic about these talks," he said, adding however that “we are very pessimistic about the other side, but we are optimistic about our own capabilities."

Khamenei added, "Ultimately, it is a task and a move that has been decided upon, and the initial steps have been implemented well.”

"We must avoid linking the country's issues to these discussions, repeating the mistake of the JCPOA where national progress was made dependent on the negotiation's advancement. Such an approach creates a conditional environment, stalling everything until the talks' results are known," the Supreme Leader said in a reference to the 2015 agreement.

Khamenei's carefully balanced comments suggest a pragmatic approach to the dialogue, acknowledging the necessity of exploring diplomatic avenues while maintaining deep reservations about the intentions of the American side.

As Tehran and Washington gear up for the next nuclear talks on April 19, a sense of cautious optimism appears to be growing among Iranian officials and many public figures,apparently stemming from a perceived shift in Khamenei’s stance, evidenced by his greenlight of Muscat negotiations.

The influence of ultra-hardline opponents of US engagement, such as former nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili and the Steadfastness Front (Paydari Party), appears to be diminishing amid internal divisions.

Resistance to negotiations among hardliners has softened because outright opposition risks being seen as defiance of Khamenei’s authority.

Iran's ambassador to Oman denied reports that a senior Iranian diplomat pocketed a gold pen belonging to the Omani hosts during the talks in Muscat.

Reports circulating online had alleged that Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi took a gold-plated pen from the negotiation venue.

Iranian Ambassador Mousa Farhang dismissed the allegations as lies, saying in an interview with Tasnim news agency that there were neither tables nor gold-plated pens in the arrangement of the meeting rooms.

The controversy began with rumors spreading on Telegram that Gharibabadi had mistakenly put a gold pen, provided by the host nation according to protocol, in his pocket.

This led to a fabricated report attributed to the Times of Oman newspaper, saying that Ambassador Farhang had sent a letter to the Omani Foreign Ministry demanding an apology for local media's "marginalization" of an unintentional error by an Iranian negotiator.

Ambassador Farhang told Tasnim that the "lie published by a Telegram channel affiliated with the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) terrorist group regarding Gharibabadi is the height of foolishness."

Reports had suggested the gold-plated pen was worth around $14,000, that Gharibabadi was recorded on CCTV, and that he returned it via the Iranian embassy in Oman.