Iran sees 'good chance' for agreement if US drops threats

US Energy Secretary Chris Wright said on Friday that Washington’s Persian Gulf allies are “extremely concerned” about the possibility of a nuclear-powered Iran and share the United States’ commitment to preventing that outcome.

While declining to detail specific enforcement tools, Wright warned that the US has the capability to curb Iran’s oil exports.

“I’m not going to talk about the specific methodology of how we stop Iran oil exports, but we can turn the screws on Iran 100%,” he told Reuters.

“We can follow the ships from Iran, we know where they go, we can stop Iran’s export of oil,” he added.

Iran is prepared to discuss its regional allied forces in talks with the US, Al Hadath reported Friday, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter.

Tehran views its proxies as weakened and may be willing to negotiate over them in exchange for preserving its missile program, the Saudi channel added.

A senior Iranian cleric on Friday strongly opposed renewed talks with the United States, saying any negotiations—direct or indirect—would undermine Iran’s national pride and repeat decades of failed diplomacy.

“Negotiating with America is against our national pride,” said Ahmad Alamolhoda, the firebrand Friday imam of Mashhad, during his sermon, according to the semi-official Mehr news agency. “No Iranian with self-respect would accept to approach the US empty-handed.”

He added that US demands—ranging from dismantling Iran’s missile program to limiting its regional influence—amounted to surrender. “They want us to give up everything: our weapons, our science, even our pride. No honorable Iranian would accept that.”

Calling on Iran’s negotiators to resist pressure, Alamolhoda warned: “Direct talks are worse than indirect ones. We’ve been here before—and it always ends badly.”

Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has given his approval for nuclear negotiations with the United States, including the possibility of direct talks if initial discussions show progress, The New York Times reported on Friday.

According to two senior Iranian officials cited by NYT, Khamenei reversed his long-standing opposition to engagement with Washington following an urgent meeting last month with the heads of Iran’s executive, legislative, and judicial branches.

“At the end of the hourslong meeting, Mr. Khamenei relented. He granted his permission for talks, first indirect, through an intermediary, and then, if things proceeded well, for direct talks between US and Iranian negotiators,” the paper reported.

The shift came amid internal warnings that failure to engage could lead to war with the United States or Israel, further economic collapse, and threats to Tehran's stability, the officials said.

Formal talks are expected to begin Saturday in Oman. While Iran has publicly maintained the talks will be indirect, US officials have signaled a willingness to meet face-to-face.

Khamenei has also outlined limits for the negotiations, including strict oversight of Iran’s missile program, which remains off the table, but openness to discussing nuclear transparency and regional issues, according to the NYT report.

An Iranian lawmaker said on Friday that upcoming talks with the United States must center on proving Iran is not pursuing nuclear weapons, warning that any effort to dismantle the country’s nuclear program would make talks unacceptable.

“In the talks with the US, we must prove that Iran is not pursuing the construction of a nuclear weapon,” Mousa Ghazanfariabadi, a member of parliament representing Bam, said, according to the Mehr news agency.

“But if the other side tries to shut down Iran’s nuclear program or raise unrelated issues, the negotiation is invalid and unacceptable,” he added.