• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo
ANALYSIS

Mojtaba Khamenei’s key word for Iran’s future: a people given a mission

Mehdi Beigi
Mehdi Beigi

Iran International

Jul 1, 2026, 14:44 GMT+1

Since becoming Supreme Leader, Mojtaba Khamenei has repeatedly used ba’sat, a term rooted in divine mission, to cast Iranians not just as citizens but as a force tasked with carrying forward the Islamic Republic’s project at home and beyond.

Around 20 messages and written statements have been issued in Mojtaba Khamenei’s name since the Assembly of Experts named him Iran’s new Supreme Leader on March 8.

Some have been routine: condolences, formal greetings and remarks for official occasions. But at least half go further, offering an early view of his political and ideological vocabulary.

They cover a wide range of subjects, from the army, parliament and the Persian language to Hajj, Shiite’s anniversary of Eid al-Ghadir, the Persian Gulf, the US-Iran memorandum of understanding and the so-called Axis of Resistance.

Read together, one word stands out: ba’sat (be’that).

In Islamic tradition, ba’sat refers to being chosen and sent on a divine mission. It is most closely associated with prophethood: the moment a prophet is commissioned to carry a message and fulfill a sacred duty.

In Mojtaba Khamenei’s messages, however, the word is not used only as a religious expression. It becomes a political language for describing the role of the people.

100%
People walk in front of a banner of Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei in Tehran (May 2026)

A sacred word enters politics

Mojtaba Khamenei has used ba’sat in several forms: the ba’sat of the Iranian nation, the ba’sat of the people, the ba’sat of artists, a mission-bearing nation and even a commissioned Islamic ummah.

The ummah, in Islamic political language, refers to the wider Muslim community beyond national borders.

In this framework, Iranians are not presented merely as citizens of a country, voters in a political system or supporters of the Islamic Republic.

They are described as bearers of a historical mission. That is where ba’sat becomes politically important.

It casts the people as the human force of a larger ideological project, rather than simply as a society expected to support the government.

The first clear example appeared in Mojtaba Khamenei’s Hajj message in late May.

He wrote that after the killing of Ali Khamenei, the Iranian nation experienced a divine ba’sat and astonished the world by appearing wherever its presence was needed.

The more revealing line came later. Following the ba’sat of the Iranian nation and the Axis of Resistance, he wrote, the ba’sat of the Islamic ummah would follow.

In a single sequence, he linked the Iranian people, Tehran’s regional network of allied forces and the wider Muslim world.

The message was not only that Iranians had awakened. It was that they had been assigned a role in a project extending beyond Iran’s borders.

People or a mission-bearing nation?

The same pattern appears in other messages. In a statement marking Ferdowsi Day, artists were asked to carry out their own ba’sat in continuation of the people’s ba’sat, and to record the story of this uprising for history.

In a message marking the start of the third year of the 12th parliament, the legislature was told to bring itself into line with a mission-bearing nation.

The chain is revealing.

The mission begins with the people, moves into culture and art, enters formal institutions such as parliament, and is then projected outward toward the Islamic ummah and the Axis of Resistance.

This is not just ceremonial language. In Mojtaba Khamenei’s early vocabulary, the people are not treated simply as a source of legitimacy or as a crowd mobilized for elections, funerals and rallies.

They are framed as a force expected to move the system forward.

That role is tied to resistance against the United States and Israel, support for Tehran’s regional allies, and the claim that Iran is helping shape a new regional and global order.

People inside an old project

This language also connects Mojtaba Khamenei to one of Ali Khamenei’s central ideological themes.

For years, the former Supreme Leader spoke of a five-stage process leading to a new Islamic civilization.

In that theory, the Islamic Revolution was only the beginning.

It was to be followed by an Islamic system, an Islamic government, an Islamic society and, finally, a new Islamic civilization.

Institutions alone were never enough for that project. The theory required society itself to be transformed, with people seeing themselves not merely as subjects of a government but as participants in a long ideological struggle.

Mojtaba Khamenei’s use of ba’sat appears to supply that missing human engine.

If Ali Khamenei’s five-stage theory was the roadmap, ba’sat is Mojtaba Khamenei’s way of describing the people expected to carry it forward.

The Iranian nation becomes mission-bearing. Artists must narrate that mission. Parliament must adjust itself to it. The Axis of Resistance gives it regional depth. And the Islamic ummah gives it a transnational horizon.

Resistance remains central

This is why ba’sat matters beyond the number of times it appears.

Terms such as resistance, America, Israel and the Iranian nation have long been central to the Islamic Republic’s political vocabulary.

Ba’sat does something more specific. It redefines the relationship between people and power.

In this view, people are not only expected to obey, vote, mourn, rally or endure.

They are said to have been commissioned into a larger project, one that links domestic loyalty to regional confrontation and an imagined future order.

In Mojtaba Khamenei’s first message after becoming Supreme Leader, he described the Axis of Resistance as an inseparable part of the values of the Islamic Revolution.

In later messages, he returned to Lebanon, Palestine, Iraq and Yemen.

After the US-Iran memorandum, he said he had initially opposed the agreement but allowed its implementation because the president and the Supreme National Security Council had pledged to protect both the rights of the Iranian nation and those of the Axis of Resistance.

In his Persian Gulf message, he linked the policy of resistance and a strong Iran to the beginning of a new regional and global order.

Mojtaba Khamenei is not abandoning the ideological architecture of his predecessor. He is recasting it in a new vocabulary, with the people placed more explicitly at the center of the mission.

If this reading is correct, ba’sat is more than a religious flourish.

It may be the connecting term between the second and third leaders of the Islamic Republic: a word that preserves Ali Khamenei’s project of a new Islamic civilization while giving Mojtaba Khamenei a language of his own.

The result is not an ideological break. It is an effort to continue the same project with a sharper definition of the people’s role in it: not simply as supporters of the Islamic Republic, but as a people told they have been given a mission.

Most Viewed

Iranian hardliners turn on Ghalibaf and judiciary after lawmaker’s sentencing
1
INSIGHT

Iranian hardliners turn on Ghalibaf and judiciary after lawmaker’s sentencing

2
INSIGHT

US ‘feedback’ leaves Iran debating the price of diplomacy

3

Iran's Guards urge Americans to vote out their leaders in 26-page letter

4

Iran says awaiting US response on Hormuz proposal

5

German-based aid worker gets 10-year prison sentence in Iran

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Iran turns to younger children in postwar ideological push
    ANALYSIS

    Iran turns to younger children in postwar ideological push

  • US ‘feedback’ leaves Iran debating the price of diplomacy
    INSIGHT

    US ‘feedback’ leaves Iran debating the price of diplomacy

  • ‘I never asked about regime change’: Student speaks out after El-Sayed exchange

    ‘I never asked about regime change’: Student speaks out after El-Sayed exchange

  • Iranian hardliners turn on Ghalibaf and judiciary after lawmaker’s sentencing
    INSIGHT

    Iranian hardliners turn on Ghalibaf and judiciary after lawmaker’s sentencing

  • The body as a battleground: Iran's resistance etched in ink and blood
    SPECIAL REPORT

    The body as a battleground: Iran's resistance etched in ink and blood

  • Khamenei’s vision of Iranian power faces a test of reality
    ANALYSIS

    Khamenei’s vision of Iranian power faces a test of reality

Banner
Banner
•
•
•

More Stories

Khamenei to end Eje'i’s judiciary tenure after one term

Jun 30, 2026, 20:48 GMT+1
100%

Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei plans to remove judiciary chief Gholam-Hossein Mohseni Eje'i at the end of his first five-year term and appoint a new figure to lead the judiciary, sources familiar with the matter told Iran International.

Sources inside Iran told Iran International that Khamenei does not intend to extend Eje'i’s term for another five years, breaking with a practice followed for nearly four decades in which judiciary chiefs have usually served two consecutive five-year terms.

The sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the decision is not aimed at judicial reform but is part of a broader reshaping of power after the recent war.

They said the new supreme leader is seeking to replace key officials in major state institutions with figures more closely aligned with him.

Eje'i’s expected removal could mark one of the first major signs of Khamenei’s effort to rebuild control over the Islamic Republic’s judicial, security and political apparatus after the transfer of power.

Hardliners step up pressure on Eje'i

The decision comes amid growing criticism of Eje'i from hardline figures after the names of Supreme National Security Council members who voted in favor of a memorandum of understanding with the United States were disclosed.

Critics say Eje'i’s vote was at odds with Khamenei’s stated position, after the leader said in a letter that he had, in principle, held a different view on the memorandum of understanding.

Signs of dissatisfaction with Eje'i’s five-year record have also appeared in recent official and semi-official commentary close to the power structure.

In a message marking Judiciary Week, Khamenei did not clearly endorse Eje'i’s continuation in office. Instead, he addressed the judiciary as an institution and called for the “actualization” of demands previously made by former Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

The message repeated calls for the implementation of the judicial transformation document, fighting corruption inside the judiciary, reviving public rights, blocking the use of recommendations and lobbying, and improving communication with the public.

Eje'i seeks to defend his record

A day later, Eje'i published a letter to Khamenei in deferential language, defending the judiciary’s performance and pledging to continue the path of “judicial transformation.”

“I and all components of the judiciary consider ourselves obliged to carry out Your Excellency’s binding commands precisely, swiftly and without any reduction,” Eje'i wrote.

Media outlets and figures close to the establishment criticized Eje'i for not publishing such a letter before Khamenei’s message. Some also described the new leader’s renewed emphasis on his father’s demands as a negative assessment of Eje'i’s record, arguing that their repetition showed the judiciary had failed to deliver practical results under him.

Rival factions inside the establishment have also stepped up attacks on Eje'i, accusing him of distancing himself from the leadership’s demands.

Media close to Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf and President Masoud Pezeshkian have described the attacks as part of an effort by the faction aligned with Saeed Jalili, a member of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, and the Paydari Front to create divisions among senior officials and weaken the postwar political path.

Media close to the judiciary and Eje'i’s supporters have sought to portray his five-year record as successful, citing reduced imprisonment, electronic court proceedings, shorter trials, anti-corruption efforts and public outreach.

Rights groups point to record of repression

Human rights groups and activists say Eje'i is not a reformist figure but a long-standing part of the Islamic Republic’s repressive judicial and security apparatus.

They point to his record in the Special Clerical Court, the Ministry of Intelligence, and later as first deputy and head of the judiciary, saying his tenure has been marked by continued heavy sentences against protesters, political activists, journalists, prisoners of conscience and minorities.

Rights advocates say the judiciary under Eje'i has continued to act as the legal and executive arm of security institutions in political and security cases.

They also argue that replacing Eje'i alone would not bring meaningful change without structural reform, an end to security interference in judicial cases, guaranteed access to lawyers, a halt to forced confessions, the annulment of political verdicts and respect for fair trial standards.