• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

US, Iran near one-page deal to end war - Axios

May 6, 2026, 10:01 GMT+1Updated: 11:17 GMT+1
An Iranian woman walks next to a mural on a street in Tehran, Iran, May 5, 2026.
An Iranian woman walks next to a mural on a street in Tehran, Iran, May 5, 2026.

The United States is close to an interim agreement with Iran to end the war and launch nuclear negotiations, with Tehran expected to respond on key points within 48 hours, Axios reported on Wednesday, citing two US officials and two other sources briefed on the issue.

The report said this was the closest the two sides had come to a deal since the war began, although nothing has been agreed.

Meanwhile, a Pakistani source involved in mediation efforts told Reuters that Tehran and Washington were close to agreeing on the one-page memorandum to end the war, confirming the Axios report.

“We will close this very soon. We are getting close,” the source said.

Iran leadership divided

The White House believes Iran’s leadership is divided, which could complicate efforts to reach consensus, while some US officials remain skeptical that even an initial deal will be achieved, according to Axios.

It added that US President Donald Trump’s decision to pause the planned Project Freedom operation in the Strait of Hormuz was based on progress in the talks.

Reopening the Strait of Hormuz

A proposed one-page, 14-point memorandum of understanding would declare an end to hostilities and start a 30-day period of talks on a detailed agreement, according to Axios.

Those negotiations would focus on reopening transit through the Strait of Hormuz, limiting Iran’s nuclear program and lifting US sanctions. Talks could take place in Islamabad or Geneva, two sources said.

Iran’s restrictions on shipping and the US naval blockade would also be eased during the 30-day period, a US official said, adding that Washington could quickly restore the blockade or resume military action if talks collapse.

The US imposed the blockade in April to pressure Iran after talks failed, while Tehran restricted transit through the strait in response.

Uranium enrichment

Under the draft, Iran would commit to a moratorium on uranium enrichment, while the United States would gradually lift sanctions and release billions of dollars in frozen Iranian funds, sources told Axios.

The duration of the enrichment freeze remains under negotiation, with sources saying it could last at least 12 years, possibly extending to 15, compared with Iran’s proposal of five years and a US demand for 20.

Two sources said Iran could also agree to remove its highly enriched uranium from the country, a key US demand that Tehran has previously rejected.

The draft would also include commitments by Iran not to pursue nuclear weapons, accept enhanced UN inspections including snap checks, and potentially halt operations at underground facilities, a US official said.

Most Viewed

Pezeshkian brands IRGC escalation ‘madness’ as tensions rise in Tehran
1
EXCLUSIVE

Pezeshkian brands IRGC escalation ‘madness’ as tensions rise in Tehran

2

Trump says Iranian people must have guns to fight

3

Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

4

US intelligence sees limited new damage to Iran nuclear program

5
INSIGHT

Iran’s warnings give way to action as US launches Hormuz 'escort' plan

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • Pro-regime graffiti in Los Angeles sparks concern in Iranian-American hub

    Pro-regime graffiti in Los Angeles sparks concern in Iranian-American hub

  • Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods
    INSIGHT

    Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods

  • Iran’s warnings give way to action as US launches Hormuz 'escort' plan
    INSIGHT

    Iran’s warnings give way to action as US launches Hormuz 'escort' plan

  • Iran secretly buries executed Swedish citizen at site linked to mass graves
    EXCLUSIVE

    Iran secretly buries executed Swedish citizen at site linked to mass graves

  • Abroad they talk, at home they hang
    TEHRAN INSIDER

    Abroad they talk, at home they hang

  • Who speaks for Iran: What the public rift means, and what it hides
    INSIGHT

    Who speaks for Iran: What the public rift means, and what it hides

•
•
•

More Stories

Pro-regime graffiti in Los Angeles sparks concern in Iranian-American hub

May 5, 2026, 22:27 GMT+1
•
Niloufar Mansouri

Graffiti in support of Iran’s theocracy has appeared in one of the most prominent Iranian-American neighborhoods in the United States, prompting concern among some residents about intimidation and the spillover of political tensions into diaspora communities.

One of the markings found in the area bore the name “DISO,” a Los Angeles-based graffiti group whose work has largely focused on pro-Palestinian and anti-Israel messaging.

The group’s Instagram page includes several posts opposing the US-Israeli war on Iran and expressing support for the Islamic Republic. It has also openly criticized prominent opposition leader and exiled prince, Reza Pahlavi.

The DISO marking was found on a billboard structure along the northbound side of Westwood Boulevard, just north of Missouri Avenue. The graffiti appeared alongside color patterns resembling the flag of the Islamic Republic.

In a separate incident, “Stop War” was spray-painted over photographs of slain Iranian protesters displayed on a nearby memorial wall. There is no evidence that the vandalism of the memorial wall was carried out by DISO.

100%

The wall commemorates protesters killed during a wave of unrest in Iran in January, described by activists as the “Bloody January Massacre”, where at least 36,500 people were killed in the crackdown.

The memorial had become a focal point for collective mourning and political expression among members of the Iranian diaspora, many of whom have called for greater international attention and support following the mass killings.

Its vandalism is viewed by some residents not only as an act of destruction but also as an attempt to undermine or erase a narrative of loss and resistance that holds deep significance for the community.

'Deliberate act of intimidation'

Despite reports submitted to the City of Los Angeles, some of the graffiti has remained in place, raising questions among residents about response times and local authorities’ handling of politically sensitive vandalism.

Roozbeh Farahanipour, a political activist and member of the West Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, told Iran International the graffiti represents what he described as a deliberate act of intimidation.

He said the public display of such messaging in Westwood sends what he described as a direct threat by the Islamic Republic and its affiliated networks against the Iranian-American community.

100%

Farahanipour said the imagery reflects an effort by Iranian authorities and their supporters to project power “in the capital of their opposition,” referring to the concentration of Iranian dissidents and exiles in the area.

As an anti-war activist, he added that political activists and business owners in Westwood “will never allow the flag of the Islamic Republic to be displayed or normalized in this community.”

He further characterized the graffiti as a security concern, warning that such messaging, particularly amid ongoing tensions involving Iran, can contribute to fear and intimidation among residents.

For many residents of Westwood, often referred to as “Tehrangeles” because of its large Iranian-American population, the appearance of pro-Islamic Republic messaging carries emotional weight.

The neighborhood has historically served as a refuge for Iranians who left the country after the 1979 revolution and subsequent political repression.

100%

US says not seeking conflict with Iran as it deploys shipping protection mission

May 5, 2026, 13:24 GMT+1

US War Secretary Pete Hegseth said the United States is not seeking conflict with Iran as it launches a temporary operation to protect shipping in the Persian Gulf.

“We’re not looking for a fight,” Hegseth said, describing the effort as defensive and limited in scope.

He said the operation, known as Project Freedom, aims to restore the flow of commerce through the Strait of Hormuz and protect commercial vessels from Iranian aggression.

“Project Freedom is defensive in nature, focused in scope and temporary in duration, with one mission, protecting innocent commercial shipping from Iranian aggression,” he said.

Hegseth said US forces would not need to enter Iranian waters or airspace, adding the mission is designed to secure global energy routes and support international trade.

He warned Iran against interfering with shipping. “If you attack American troops or innocent commercial shipping, you will face overwhelming and devastating American firepower,” he said.

Hegseth added the operation would eventually be handed over to international partners, saying the waterway is more critical to the global economy than to the United States.

Iranian papers cast Hormuz escalation as display of power

May 5, 2026, 13:17 GMT+1

Iranian newspapers reacted to the latest escalation in the Strait of Hormuz and attacks on the United Arab Emirates with a tone of pride and vindication, presenting the crisis as proof that Tehran can set the rules in the Persian Gulf.

The coverage followed UAE accusations that Iran launched missile and drone attacks, including on Fujairah, as the United States moved to escort ships through the strait under President Donald Trump’s “Project Freedom.”

Some papers in Iran went beyond portraying the escalation as leverage and treated it as a moment of humiliation for the UAE.

The most striking example came from the ultraconservative daily Vatan-e Emrooz, which used a macabre pun to turn the UAE’s Persian name into a taunt.

The front page of Vatan-e Emrooz
100%
The front page of Vatan-e Emrooz

Instead of Emarat-e Mottahedeh-ye Arabi – the United Arab Emirates – it wrote Emarat-e Monfajereh, roughly “the Exploded Arab Emirates:” a wordplay that treats an attack on a neighboring country as a punchline and a boast.

Hardline Kayhan carried the message beyond the Persian Gulf, with a threat by its editor Hossein Shariatmadari: “Europe knows that we can, and we will strike.”

Javan, affiliated with the Revolutionary Guards, published a photo of the strait alongside an image of Alireza Tangsiri, the former Guards navy commander killed in March, with a quote attributed to him: “Because we are a superpower.”

JameJam, linked to Iran’s official broadcaster, used a cartoon of Trump trapped in the strait and struggling to open it. Its headline read: “Hormuz dead end.” The image captured a theme repeated across several papers: the United States as stuck, and Iran as the actor controlling the passage.

The front page of JameJam paper
100%
The front page of JameJam paper

Other newspapers used more formal language but carried the same message. Sobh-e No and Ettela’at ran headlines such as “Iranian order in the strait” and “Iran’s show of power in the Strait of Hormuz.”

Ettela’at wrote that any foreign armed force, especially the US military, would be attacked if it tried to enter the strait, and that only vessels coordinating with Iranian forces would be allowed to pass safely.

Farhikhtegan gave the confrontation an economic frame. Under the headline “Iran’s $30 billion is no longer hostage to the UAE,” the paper argued that the collapse of trade and currency ties with the Emirates could create opportunities for Iran.

The framing appeared to respond to reports that the UAE was considering freezing billions of dollars in Iranian-linked assets and targeting the shell companies and exchange networks that have helped connect Iran to foreign currency and global trade.

The paper described the UAE as a former “golden corridor” for bypassing sanctions, but said it had become a full adversary after the war. It also said that more than 80 percent of Iran’s currency settlements had been conducted through the Emirati dirham.

That framing is central to the front pages. The UAE is not portrayed merely as a neighboring country pulled deeper into the war. It is presented as the closest and most exposed partner of Washington in the Persian Gulf – a place through which Tehran can send a message to the United States, Israel, Europe and regional governments at once.

There were some more cautious voices. Donya-e Eqtesad set out possible scenarios ranging from a prolonged standoff to direct military confrontation or renewed diplomacy.

Yet even that more analytical treatment reflected the same basic reality: Hormuz has become the Islamic Republic’s main card in a war already extending beyond Iran, the United States and Israel.

Trump says Iranian people must have guns to fight

May 5, 2026, 13:11 GMT+1

Iranians need access to weapons to challenge their rulers, President Donald Trump said on Monday, arguing that protesters would fight effectively if armed but are currently outmatched by government forces.

“They have to have guns. And I think they’re getting some guns. As soon as they have guns, they’ll fight like, as good as anybody there is,” Trump said in an interview with The Hugh Hewitt Show.

Trump also suggested that US military pressure had already significantly weakened Iran and that further action could be completed within a short timeframe.

“We’ve taken out much of what we’d have to do, probably another two weeks, two weeks, maybe three weeks,” he said.

Trump said large numbers of Iranians would struggle to confront armed forces without access to weapons.

“You can’t have an unarmed population against people with AK-47s,” he said, adding that even hundreds of thousands of protesters would struggle against a smaller armed force.

He said previous protests had been met with heavy force, citing the deaths of tens of thousands of demonstrators, and suggested this had made him cautious about encouraging renewed unrest.

“I’m very torn on it, because they lost 42,000 people in the first two weeks. I don’t really want to see that,” Trump said.

Past weapons transfers

Trump said during a phone interview with Fox Sunday in early April that his administration had previously attempted to send firearms to Iranian protesters but that the effort did not reach its intended recipients.

“We sent guns to the protesters, a lot of them. We sent them through the Kurds. And I think the Kurds took the guns,” he said.

He repeated similar complaints, saying he was “very upset with a certain group of people” and warning they would “pay a big price.”

Several Kurdish groups have denied receiving such shipments.

  • Trump rhetoric signals shift toward conflict, experts say

    Trump rhetoric signals shift toward conflict, experts say

Calls in Washington to arm Iranians

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham has also urged the administration to pursue a policy of directly arming Iranian civilians.

“If I were President Trump and I were Israel, I would load the Iranian people up with weapons so they can go to the streets armed and turn the tide of battle inside Iran,” Graham said in an interview with Fox News on Monday.

“We don’t need American boots on the ground. We’ve got millions of boots on the ground in Iran. They just don’t have any weapons,” he added.

Graham described the idea as “a Second Amendment solution,” suggesting that arming civilians could help bring down the government without direct foreign military involvement.

He also called for alternative channels to deliver weapons, urging the administration not to rely on Kurdish intermediaries.

Military pressure and internal divisions

Trump framed his comments within a broader assessment that Iran’s military and economic capacity had been significantly weakened.

“They have no navy. They have no air force. They have no anti-aircraft,” he told The Hugh Hewitt Show.

Trump added that financial pressure may have affected the government’s ability to pay its forces.

  • Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

    Trump wants deal soon or may bomb Iran - Axios

“We don’t think they’re paying their soldiers and their Guard anymore,” he said.

He also suggested divisions within Iran’s security structure, drawing a distinction between the regular army and other forces.

“We purposefully have not gone after them too much, because we think that they’re much more moderate,” Trump said.

At the same time, he said the United States was not seeking to dismantle the country’s military institutions entirely.

“We’re not looking to decimate the army,” he said, referring to past regional experiences.

“You know, when they did Iraq... and the worst thing was they got rid of the all the leaders, so nobody knew who the leader was. And then all of a sudden, you had ISIS. We don’t want to do that.”

Nuclear focus remains central

Despite discussing internal unrest, Trump said that preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons remains the central objective of US policy.

“The one thing I will say is they will never have a nuclear weapon,” he said.

Trump said any potential agreement would require the return of highly enriched uranium and limits on missile development, though he stressed that nuclear restrictions remain the priority.

Iran’s labor market cracking under layoffs and inflation

May 5, 2026, 10:57 GMT+1
•
Hooman Abedi

Iranians described layoffs, unpaid wages and rising food and medical costs in messages to Iran International, while labor market data and local media reports pointed to a widening employment shock after the ceasefire.

“We do not know how we can go on with these prices. Yesterday I bought two sausages. It cost 1 million rials,” one viewer told Iran International, an amount equal to about 60 cents.

The strain is deepening as Iran’s minimum wage has fallen below $90 and the rial continues to lose value, hitting a new low this week.

Another message said workers at a glass factory had still not received their March wages and that supplementary insurance had been cut.

Several citizens linked the deterioration to factory closures after the ceasefire, shortages of raw materials and rising rents.

“Since the ceasefire, most factories have shut down, especially in industrial estates. Everyone has become unemployed because of shortages of raw materials. Daily goods have become more expensive, deposits and rents have gone up, and medical and drug costs have soared,” one message said.

  • Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods

    Tehran media break silence on war’s toll on livelihoods

Service platforms absorb jobseekers

Shargh daily reported that new registrations on the home-services platform Achareh rose sharply in late April compared with the same period last year, especially in lower-barrier work such as cleaning and catering.

Registrations for cleaning and catering rose 239 percent from April 21 to May 2, while electrical work rose 220 percent, plumbing 176 percent, cooling services 150 percent, and building maintenance 140 percent, according to figures provided to Shargh.

File photo: Construction workers take a break at a site in Iran
100%
File photo: Construction workers take a break at a site in Iran

Bahman Emam, the platform’s chief executive and co-founder, told Shargh that overall job registrations had risen 30 percent.

“We witnessed widespread layoffs this year, and it seems a significant share of applicants are seeking a first job,” Emam said.

Shargh also reported that some workers who had left the platform for traditional markets were seeking to return, while others who could no longer afford life in Tehran asked to activate their profiles in other cities.

Experts warn shock may endure

Ashkan Nezamabadi, an economic journalist in Berlin, told Iran International that Iran’s labor market had entered a dangerous phase.

“Only one of the two main job platforms in Iran announced a few days ago that it had 318,000 new job applications in one day, which was a new record,” Nezamabadi said.

He said new job opportunities had fallen by about 80 percent, while economic losses and internet disruptions added to the strain.

“These changes clearly show something is breaking in the labor market,” he said.

Government plans to issue loans worth 220 million rials (around $120) per worker were unlikely to prevent layoffs or create durable jobs, according to Nezamabadi.

He said assistance would be more effective if directed toward consumers to preserve demand, contrasting it with pandemic-era support programs in Europe and the United States.

  • Internet shutdown drives Iranians to leave country for access

    Internet shutdown drives Iranians to leave country for access

Wages fall below subsistence costs

Iran’s Labor News Agency (ILNA) reported that the cost of a basic household livelihood basket had reached 713 million rials (about $385), up from 450 million rials (about $240) used in wage talks earlier this year.

Faramarz Tofighi, a labor activist who calculates livelihood costs, told ILNA that even the earlier estimate was not realistic and that wages did not reach 60 percent of it.

“That same unrealistic 450 million rial basket has today reached 713 million rials,” Tofighi said.

ILNA said the minimum wage including benefits had fallen to about $88 after the rial’s decline, leaving workers unable to cover rent and food.

Workers cited in the report said they were struggling to buy even bread and eggs, with meat and rice removed from many household shopping lists.

File photo: Seasonal workers wait for daily jobs in Tehran
100%
File photo: Seasonal workers wait for daily jobs in Tehran

Political fallout grows

Milad Rasaei-Manesh, a political activist based in Stockholm, linked the downturn to broader structural issues.

“Today the economy is effectively destroyed, and the war and policies pursued have led to widespread unemployment and deeper poverty,” Rasaei-Manesh told Iran International.

He said internet restrictions had compounded the crisis by cutting off income sources.

“Internet shutdowns have directly caused job losses and pushed more people into poverty,” he said.

He said economic pressures could drive coordinated protest action. "If workers organize through strikes and collective action, they can accelerate change,” he added.

The mounting evidence points to a labor market squeezed from both ends: more people seeking work, and fewer households able to pay for services.