Iran MP says US sincerity key to progress in nuclear talks

A senior Iranian lawmaker warned on Thursday that mixed messages from US officials could harm the ongoing nuclear negotiations, urging Washington to demonstrate consistency and seriousness.

“If the US truly has the determination to pursue negotiations, it must stop sending contradictory signals and avoid dual-track policies,” said Abbas Golroo, head of the Iranian parliament’s Foreign Relations Committee, according to ISNA.

Golroo said Iran’s negotiating team had laid out a clear and precise framework during talks in Muscat, and that Tehran expects a coherent response from the US. He added that parliament supports the current negotiating track and remains hopeful that a deal that serves Iran’s national interest can be reached.

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Thursday that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) can play a key role in resolving the Iranian nuclear issue peacefully, following a meeting in Tehran with agency chief Rafael Grossi.

“I had a useful discussion with visiting IAEA chief Grossi,” Araghchi wrote on X. “In the coming months, the agency can play a crucial role in peaceful settlement of the Iranian nuclear file.”

He added: “As variety of spoilers are gathered to derail current negotiations, we need a Director General of Peace.”

Araghchi emphasized Iran’s hope that Grossi would keep the agency focused on its technical mission. “Our predisposition is to trust Grossi in mission to keep the Agency away from politics and politicization, and to retain focus on its technical mandate,” he said.

Former Israeli defense minister Benny Gantz on Thursday accused Iran of dragging out negotiations with the United States and said Israel must act decisively to prevent Tehran from acquiring nuclear capabilities.

“The Iranian regime are experts at stalling,” Gantz wrote on X. “The State of Israel must, and can remove the prospect of Iranian nuclear capabilities.”

He added, “Coordinating closely with our great ally the United States, it is time to change the Middle East.”

US President Donald Trump has decided against supporting an Israeli military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, favoring diplomatic negotiations with Tehran instead, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing officials familiar with internal discussions.​

Israeli officials had developed plans to attack Iran's nuclear sites as early as May, aiming to delay Tehran's ability to develop nuclear weapons by a year or more, according to the report. These plans would have required US assistance to ensure success and to defend against potential Iranian retaliation.​

The decision followed internal debates within the Trump administration, revealing divisions between officials advocating for military action and those favoring diplomatic solutions. Some officials expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of a military strike and concerns over escalating into a broader conflict.​

Trump communicated his decision to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during a recent meeting in Washington, emphasizing the initiation of negotiations with Iran. Despite this, Trump indicated that military options remain on the table should diplomacy fail.

A hardline Iranian lawmaker said Iran's top diplomat has solicited domestic opposition to his nuclear negotiating team in order to boost the Islamic Republic's bargaining power with the United States.

Hamid Rasaei said he was asked by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi to criticize the Foreign Ministry's performance.

"Araghchi asked us for some criticism, some pressure ... Common sense says that as a member of parliament, I should use criticism to strengthen his bargaining power," he told the Hamshahri newspaper.

"For example, we say the negotiators must never bring enrichment below 60%, so that when he goes to the negotiating table, he can tell them: "No matter what you say, we can't comply because the representatives of the people in parliament won't allow us."