Iran has indicated a willingness to open its markets to American investors if a nuclear deal is reached, but some experts argue that expecting not only US investment but any significant foreign investment is highly unrealistic.
“Speaking of a trillion-dollar investment from the United States is nothing but a dream and fantasy,” said Ferial Mostofi, head of the Investment Services Center at the Tehran Chamber of Commerce, in an interview with Shargh daily. “How can we expect foreign investors to come to Iran when domestic investors move their capital out of the country?”
In its article titled “Foreign Investment: Mirage or Reality?”, Shargh referred to a claim circulating in Iranian circles that Tehran is seeking an agreement with the United States to guarantee $1 trillion in US investment over twenty years. “This claim means the United States would have to invest $50 billion in Iran annually.”
Shargh also recalled past official claims that China had pledged $400 billion in investments in Iran’s oil, gas, petrochemical, and transport sectors, while Russia’s Gazprom was expected to invest $40 billion in Iran’s gas industry. The article pointed out that none of those promised investments ever materialized.
“[A trillion-dollar US investment] is exactly like the much-discussed $400 billion investment from China [over twenty-five years],” the article said, arguing that China has not—and likely will not—invest such a large sum in Iran due to several factors, including inadequate hard infrastructure in transportation and energy, lack of transparency, and political risks.
Iran is in urgent need of foreign investment to revitalize its aging oil and gas infrastructure and to support other key sectors, including its large but struggling automotive industry.
According to the 2024 report of the UN Trade and Development (UNCTAD), Iran attracted $1.4 billion in foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2023. The meager figures stood at $1.5 billion in 2022 and $1.4 billion in 2021. The highest recorded FDI level was over $5 billion in 2017, following the implementation of the 2015 JCPOA nuclear deal which lifted UN economic sanctions against Iran.
President Masoud Pezeshkian said recently that Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has no objection to American investment in Iran. Foreign minister Abbas Araghchi, writing in a Washington Post op-ed, put the onus on Washington to allow American companies to access what he described as a “trillion-dollar opportunity” in Iran. Neither Pezeshkian nor Araghchi provided specific details.
The Revolutionary Guards (IRGC) linked Javan newspaper appeared to support the idea of American investment in Iran in an article it published one day before the first round of Tehran-Washington talks in Muscat on April 8. “It is possible that we accept that some American companies have the opportunity to invest or sell their products, if Iran's economic interests are met. If sanctions are lifted, these companies will be eager to invest, and Iran will be unlikely to object.”
While Khamenei has not officially banned American or other foreign investment, he has consistently advocated for stronger economic ties with Eastern countries such as Russia and China, expressing deep mistrust toward the West.
Despite publicly distancing himself from economic policymaking, Khamenei is widely believed to exert substantial control over Iran’s economy through political influence, economic entities under his authority, and the IRGC’s involvement. In one notable instance, he banned imports of South Korean electronics brands LG and Samsung in August 2021 to pressure Seoul over Iran's frozen funds.
Iran needs $200-250 billion dollars in investments to bring stability to its oil and gas sectors, an official in the chamber of commerce said, reiterating previous comments by the oil minister.
Arash Najafi, head of the energy commission at Iran’s Chamber of Commerce told local media, "In recent years, due to sanctions, we have been deprived or had limited access to many of the world’s latest technologies. At present, we need modern technology, up-to-date equipment, and serious investment to tap into the country’s underground resources, increase gas reservoir pressure, and revive oil fields."
While Iran struggles to increase oil production, its gas output is steadily declining due to loss of pressure in its main South Pars gas field in the Persian Gulf. Only multinational Western energy companies have the technology to install very large gas platforms to boost production.
"We need more than $200 to $250 billion in investment to bring the country’s oil and gas sector to a stable state. Investment is essential for energy transmission to refineries and petrochemical plants, as well as for infrastructure and related facilities,” Najafi added.
Iran's oil minister Javad Owji has also said in the past that Iran needs a minimum of $200 billion investment in its energy sector.
Tehran and Washington are currently negotiating over Iran’s nuclear program and other issues with the hope of reaching an agreement that can gradually reduce or eliminate tough US sanctions. Only then Iran can freely export oil and receive the proceeds through normal banking channels. Currently 95% of shipments go to China and it is not clear how much cash Tehran receives.
Najafi expressed hope that if relations improve with the US Iran can benefit in the energy sector. "The United States is currently a leader in the oil sector, and if we engage in economic cooperation with the US and establish an economic corridor between the two countries, we could benefit not only from its technologies but also from its investment to help develop our oil and gas fields.”
He added that Iran could also attract capital from multinational companies and move toward a stable position in the oil and gas sector.
The UN watchdog must be part of nuclear negotiations between Iran and the United States, said International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi, calling its involvement essential to any future deal’s credibility.
Grossi spoke during his visit to Tehran on Thursday, following talks with senior Iranian officials ahead of a new round of US-Iran diplomacy expected to continue in Rome.
US President Donald Trump has threatened to bomb Iran if the negotiations fail.
“I am also in contact with the American negotiator to see how the agency can be a bridge between Iran and the US, and help achieve a positive outcome in the negotiations,” Grossi said. He added that IAEA verification would be required for any agreement to be considered valid.
Grossi has been invited to Rome for the occasion of the second round of Iran-US talks, Reuters reported citing a diplomatic source. However, Iran's deputy FM says it's too soon to engage the IAEA in the talks.
In February, the agency warned that Iran was enriching uranium to near weapons-grade levels, calling the situation “of serious concern.” Tehran has consistently denied seeking nuclear arms.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and nuclear chief Mohammad Eslami met Grossi during his trip.
“Had useful discussion with visiting IAEA chief Grossi,” Abbas Araghchi wrote in a post on X. “In the coming months, the Agency can play a crucial role in peaceful settlement of the Iranian nuclear file.”
Araghchi also warned of potential domestic spoilers in the process, adding: “We need a Director General of Peace.”
The agency’s position has gained traction with US officials, who have made broader inspections a central demand.
On Monday, Trump's Envoy Steve Witkoff said in an interview with Fox News that “This is going to be much about verification on the enrichment program, and then ultimately verification on weaponization. That includes missiles—the type of missiles that they have stockpiled there—and it includes the trigger for a bomb.”
If Iran's uranium enrichment is curtailed or banned altogether, strict monitoring would become necessary. Witkoff also mentioned Iran's ballistic missile program as part of any potential nuclear weaponization and urged inspections.
Tehran media outlets controlled by hardliners warned the government on Thursday not to place hope in the outcome of renewed talks with the United States, set to resume in Rome on Saturday.
The commentaries follow five days of speculation over the venue for the second round of talks, along with a considerable degree of public negotiations in which both sides voiced at times contradictory positions.
Kayhan, a daily overseen by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s office, warned that portraying negotiations as the solution to Iran’s economic problems is both misleading and dangerous. This view aligns with Khamenei’s longstanding position since 2018, when President Donald Trump withdrew from the JCPOA nuclear deal and reimposed sanctions. At the time, Khamenei rejected negotiations with Trump and insisted that Iran could endure the pressure without making concessions.
“A tainted and mission-driven current inside the country promotes the idea that 100 percent of our economic troubles stem from sanctions, and that negotiations are the only way to remove them,” the paper wrote.
“This viewpoint was already tested during the JCPOA and yielded nothing but ‘sheer loss’.”
Kayhan did not reject talks outright but insisted they should remain limited.
“We must not abandon negotiations altogether,” the editorial continued. “But we must not put all our eggs in that basket either. At most, 30 percent of our economic problems are due to sanctions, and negotiations should be treated as just one of several tools—not the only one.”
Calling for a wartime posture across government institutions, Kayhan urged officials to invest in domestic capabilities.
“When the enemy, led by the US, threatened us with gasoline sanctions, we could have negotiated,” the paper wrote. “But what proved durable and reliable was relying on domestic capabilities… In the end, the gasoline sanctions were rendered ineffective through trust in revolutionary youth and round-the-clock efforts.”
Javan, a publication linked to the Revolutionary Guard, echoed the skepticism, warning against polarizing discourse.
“Extreme optimism or pessimism about talks risks fueling a false political dichotomy in foreign policy,” the paper wrote.
“A realistic approach strengthens the negotiating team’s resolve, avoids sending weak signals to the opponent, and builds the dignity and prudence necessary for successful diplomacy,” Javan concluded.
Iran and the US held the first round of nuclear talks in Muscat last Saturday, with both sides calling the exchange constructive. But remarks by the US representative—who initially said Iran could retain limited enrichment but later demanded a complete halt to nuclear activity—have heightened tensions.
While sovereign wealth funds tied to oil revenues in Iran’s neighboring countries have surpassed $3.6 trillion, a new report by the Iranian Parliament Research Center reveals the extensive depletion and misuse of Iran’s National Development Fund (NDF).
According to data from the Parliament Research Center, between the establishment of the National Development Fund (NDF) in 2011 and March 2024, about 82% of its $161 billion in revenue has been spent. Notably, 88% of the loans disbursed by the fund went to the government and public institutions, including the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). In effect, a fund intended as a savings mechanism for oil revenues has instead served as a financial lifeline for inefficient state entities.
Of the $132 billion in loans disbursed over the past 13 years, only $8 billion has been repaid, while $18 billion is past due and classified as non-performing.
The report also reveals that as of March 2024, the fund’s foreign exchange reserves had fallen to just $26.5 billion. After accounting for $6.5 billion in outstanding obligations, only $20 billion remains in accessible assets.
The NDF has yet to release its financial report for the past fiscal year, which ended on March 20, but investigations by Iran International indicate that the government borrowed at least $10 billion from the fund last year. This borrowing occurred either directly through authorization from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, or by seizing a portion of the fund’s share from oil export revenues as permitted by the national budget law.
Under the current fiscal year’s budget, the government is also set to borrow at least $9.4 billion out of the fund’s projected $16 billion in oil revenue.
The fund was established 14 years ago to save a portion of Iran’s oil revenues and provide loans to the private sector, replacing the former Foreign Exchange Reserve Account. However, in practice, the government and military forces took control of most of its financial resources. Only $14 billion—less than 10% of the fund’s assets—was allocated to the private sector. Given the extent of corruption and cronyism, it is unlikely that these resources reached the true private sector.
If no further unexpected withdrawals are made by the government this year, the total state debt to the fund, or spent money, will reach $125 billion by the end of the year.
The critical issue is that the Iranian government lacks the financial resources to repay its debts, and the NDF is now attempting to offset part of the government’s liabilities by investing in oil fields and selling crude oil directly. This approach not only contradicts the fund’s original purpose, but it could effectively cut the government off from its own oil export revenues.
In the past few months, the government has projected daily oil exports of 1.5-1.8 million barrels, one-third of which is to be handed over directly to military institutions. If the NDFI also becomes a direct oil exporter, the government’s role in oil exports will be further marginalized.
Situation in Neighboring Countries
While the NDF’s manageable assets have fallen below $20 billion, data from the Global SWF Institute indicates that the total reserves of oil-related sovereign wealth funds in the Persian Gulf countries and Azerbaijan have surpassed $3.6 trillion. In addition to this, these states also possess a similar amount in other sovereign wealth funds.
For example, the United Arab Emirates manages eight sovereign wealth funds with total assets of $2.3 trillion. Among them, only the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) is oil-funded, with more than $1.1 trillion in assets.
Beyond the $6.7 trillion in sovereign wealth fund assets—whether linked to oil or not—public pension funds in these oil-rich neighboring states also hold around $650 billion in capital. In contrast, Iran’s public pension funds have been effectively bankrupt for years, surviving only through annual government budget allocations.
Moreover, the foreign currency reserves of the central banks in the Persian Gulf Arab countries exceed $850 billion, whereas, according to the Global SWF Institute, Iran’s Central Bank holds just $25 billion in reserves—most of which has been lent to the government and domestic banks in the form of loans and credits.
While the National Development Fund accounts for less than 0.5% of the region’s sovereign wealth fund assets, Iran possesses the second-largest oil reserves in the region after Saudi Arabia and ranks first in natural gas reserves.
Iran also has the third-highest oil production in the region after Saudi Arabia and Iraq, and it is the largest producer of natural gas in the Middle East.
Decades of flawed policymaking, rampant corruption, and the plundering of national wealth—combined with the impact of international sanctions—have steadily crippled Iran’s financial institutions.
An Iranian conservative daily warned Tuesday that the country could expel international nuclear inspectors and relocate its enriched uranium if military threats intensify, injecting new tension into Tehran-Washington relations.
The warning came just hours before Rafael Grossi, the director of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) was due to arrive in Tehran.
“If a serious military threat emerges, Iran will expel the inspectors, cut their access, and move nuclear materials to locations beyond reach,” Farhikhtegan wrote.
It accused the IAEA of political bias and said Grossi’s previous visits had yielded cooperation only from Iran. “Despite Iran’s compliance, the agency has published reports that fuel anti-Iran resolutions,” it added.
Grossi’s visit coincides with the anticipated second round of negotiations between Iranian and US officials. While details of the agenda remain unclear, the talks have stirred strong opposition across Iran’s ultraconservative press, particularly following mixed signals from Washington.
After the first round of negotiations in Oman on Saturday, US envoy Steve Witkoff said Monday that Iran might be allowed to continue low-level enrichment under a deal resembling the original JCPOA. But on Tuesday, he tweeted that “Iran must stop and eliminate its nuclear enrichment and weaponization program.”
“A deal with Iran will only be completed if it is a Trump deal," the special envoy said.
The hardline daily Kayhan, overseen by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's office, focused on Tuesday on Witkoff’s new comments and accused the US of using diplomacy to mask coercive aims.
Editor Hossein Shariatmadari wrote that Witkoff’s offer in earlier talks had “no more value than a cheap political ruse,” adding that the US had “flunked its first test of sincerity.”
“The Americans pretend to negotiate, but their demands expose their true intentions—disarming the Islamic Republic and and plowing its land and people,” Shariatmadari said.
“Our positions are firm. It is the Americans and the Zionists who must adjust to Iran’s terms,” he said.
With nuclear inspectors in Tehran and diplomacy on a knife’s edge, Iran’s conservative media are pushing a dual message: cooperation remains conditional, but retaliation, if provoked, would be decisive.