After backlash, Iran backs down from renaming Tehran street after Sinwar

The lifting of Google Play restrictions changes little, as Iranians in the country remain unable to make purchases on the platform due to international banking limitations imposed by both the Iranian government and US sanctions.

Mehr News Agency, which published portions of the 32-point plan, quoted social media users stating that lifting the ban on WhatsApp and Google Play does little to help thousands of Iranian businesses operating on Instagram and Telegram, which remain inaccessible without the use of filter-breakers, otherwise known as circumvention software. The government’s ultimate plan is to establish more monitoring of users and controlled Internet access.

Hundreds of social media users noted that the declaration by the government did not change anything about its censorship of the Internet as although people can use WhatsApp for messaging, for all other platforms they still need to use VPNs to circumvent the censorship.

Iran began aggressively blocking websites in early 2,000s, even before the rise of social media, citing political and religious reasons. The beginning of blocking websites in Iran dates to 1998 and the reformist government of Mohammad Khatami. With the increased use of home internet in Iran, Ali Khamenei issued the "General Policies about Computer and Information Networks," which was subsequently implemented by the government with the objective of filtering of the Internet and overseeing the activities of Internet service providers (ISPs).

For over two decades, most independent Iranian news and political websites have remained inaccessible. Starting in 2009, Western social media platforms, including Facebook, were also blocked. In response, most Iranians turned to circumvention tools, such as VPNs, to bypass digital censorship.

In 2014, Hassan Rouhani's government launched the "Intelligent Internet Filtering" plan, further restricting Iranians' access to the Internet. After the 2017-2018 protests, Telegram and Instagram were also blocked. During the nationwide internet shutdown in the November 2019 protests, the government escalated its efforts to block websites and applications, aiming to disrupt protest organization, and hinder the mobilization of demonstrators.

Meanwhile, as some pro-government reformist newspapers such as Arman Melli ran headlines like "The filtering has been broken," others, including the reformist daily Etemad, emphasized that this is merely "a first step in a gradual move to lift the filtering" and urged the nation to "wait for the next step."

According to the plan, in the "next step" platforms such as YouTube might be made accessible through an added local layer or shelf that checks the users' identity and monitors what they upload and download.

Conservative newspapers, including Jam-e Jam, which is affiliated with Iran's state television, warned the government that cyberspace must be "governed" with stricter controls.

Prominent economic journalist Maryam Shokrani criticized the move on X, writing: "Are you kidding the people? We always need foreign filter-breakers to access most applications, and then have to turn them off to use Iranian banking and other apps. What has changed now…?"

Akbar Montajabi the editor-in-chief of centrist daily Sazandegi, who has over 11,900 followers, wrote on the same platform: "What has been done is good but insufficient as a first step." He advised the government: "Do not worry about lifting the filtering. Worry about losing the people's trust and your social capital."

Internet security expert Amir Nazemi, who has over 24,000 followers, analyzed the development from a political perspective. Writing on X, he said: "Filtering, slowing down Internet speeds, and cutting off access (as seen during the 2019 protests and afterward) were all tactics implemented with the Supreme Leader's approval. His signature remains on the ratification by the Supreme Council of National Security. With yesterday's decision, Mr. Khamenei has, for the first time, reversed one of his domestic political decisions. This is unprecedented and the only aspect of this development that carries real news value."

Meanwhile, Filterbaan, an account with around 12,000 followers which advocates digital and internet access rights in Iran explained that what has been already done in the first of a three-step plan, and wrote that the plan is not meant to facilitate Internet access. It is rather meant to make it even harder based on the 32-point plan drawn by the Supreme Council of Cyberspace.

Mohammadi, who has been imprisoned multiple times for her activism and is currently on a medical furlough, appeared in a video conversation with Atwood, facilitated by TIME magazine on December 18.

In the interview, the Iranian activist turned the spotlight on what she described as gender apartheid in Iran and the restriction of women’s autonomy in ways eerily similar to Atwood’s dystopian Gilead.

Margaret Atwood is a renowned Canadian author, poet, and essayist, celebrated for her profound contributions to contemporary literature. Born on November 18, 1939, in Ottawa, Canada, she is best known for her speculative fiction, including The Handmaid's Tale and its sequel, The Testaments.

Her works often explore themes of power, gender, environmentalism, and the complexities of human relationships, blending literary brilliance with sharp social commentary. Atwood's innovative storytelling and unique perspective have earned her numerous awards, including the Booker Prize, which she has won twice.

“The handmaid’s tale is quite familiar to the people of Iran,” Mohammadi said during a rare three-week medical leave from prison.

Mohammadi recounted how she began reading the novel in Evin Prison but was unable to finish it due to restrictions.

She noted how its themes and imagery have resonated deeply with Iranians, especially during the protests sparked by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement.

“Many young Iranians have been watching the Handmaid’s Tale series, and I have also heard that many performances during Iranian protests abroad have incorporated imagery and symbols from the series in solidarity,” Mohammadi said.

Atwood, speaking from New York, expressed her admiration for the courage of Iranian women in the face of systemic repression.

“I was looking at the Woman, Life, Freedom movement when it was at its height. It was remarkable, and I was amazed that they were getting away with it with all that total repression,” she said.

The Iranian activist also reflected on the broader societal changes driven by the movement, highlighting its transformative impact on Iranian culture.

“I see this change as a positive one specifically regarding the issue of forced hijab,” she said. “The change brought about by the Woman, Life, Freedom movement in Iranian society is remarkable. If we had tried to achieve this through traditional methods, such as religious, political, sociological, or women’s rights discussions, it might have taken far longer to reach this level of progress.”

Mohammadi, a journalist and campaigner against the death penalty, was awarded the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her unwavering efforts in promoting women’s rights and her relentless fight against oppression in Iran.

As a prominent voice for freedom, Mohammadi has been a leading figure in advocating for the rights of political prisoners and challenging the Iranian government's systemic injustices, including its crackdowns on protests.

Despite enduring multiple arrests, imprisonment, and harassment, her resilience and dedication have inspired millions worldwide. The Nobel Committee recognized her courage and significant role in empowering women in Iran, particularly during the Woman, Life, Freedom movement, which gained momentum following the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022 in police custody for not having proper hijab.

Use of medication to torture inmates

During the Dec. 18 conversation, Mohammadi also shared details about the inhumane treatment of women in Iranian prisons.

“One of the methods used against these women is transferring them to psychiatric hospitals,” she said. “They are given heavy medications intended for those with severe mental illness and injected with powerful drugs and even subjected to electric shocks.”

Atwood connected these accounts to historical practices under authoritarian systems. “This is very Soviet Union. This hospitalization and medication—they used to do that,” she said. “Who knows, they probably still are. And this kind of treatment was not confined to Iran.”

Mohammadi then emphasized the far-reaching consequences of controlling women in society. “When women lose control over fundamental aspects of their lives, such as their clothing, bodies, and choices through anti-women laws, it paves the way for oppressive regimes to take hold,” she said.

Atwood echoed this concern, observing how such dynamics are not confined to one country. “When I wrote it, I thought perhaps this book will become obsolete,” she said. “But the opposite has happened... This kind of total control of women, particularly their reproduction, that is already happening.”

Both women expressed hope that these stories of oppression will eventually become irrelevant. “The Handmaid’s Tale is an eternal work,” Mohammadi said.

“It continues to offer new insights and warnings in different eras.” Atwood said, “If it remains relevant, then it’s because the situation remains unequal and oppressive to women.”

The rice purchased using a lower exchange rate of US dollar was supposed to be high-quality Indian rice but was discovered to be contaminated with cheaper varieties.

The financial implications of the blunder are significant, sparking investigations and raising critical questions about the oversight and approval processes behind such large-scale imports.

"This rice was not high-quality. When I saw a sample, it was clear that most of it was a different variety," Karim Akhavan, President of the Iranian Rice Importers Association told Tasnim News Agency.

He said the mixture of inferior rice with the intended high-quality variety indicated serious mismanagement.

An analysis of the rice by a German institute confirmed the presence of impurities, though the precise level of contamination remains unclear.

The ministry of agriculture confirmed that the rice had been mixed with cheaper varieties by the foreign seller, but it stopped short of specifying what types of rice were used.

"This is a matter for Jahad Company, which is responsible for the imports," said Ahmad Khani Nozari, the Ministry's Deputy of Commerce as he tried to shift the responsibility away from the ministry.

The financial fallout from the mislabeling is expected to be considerable. The standard cost of rice imports for the ministry is between 1,010 to 1,020 euros per ton, but the contaminated shipment is believed to fall well below this price point.

Given the massive volume of the rice involved, the discrepancy could add up to millions of euros.

The Economic Security Police have launched an investigation into the case, although the full scale of the financial loss is still unclear due to the unspecified percentage of the rice that was mixed.

The timing of the scandal is particularly damaging, coming on the heels of rising food prices in Iran where at least one third of the country is living below the poverty line. Increases in the cost of basic staples like rice and legumes have put additional strain on an already struggling economy.

Jahad Company, which has long been tasked with importing rice for government reserves, faces mounting scrutiny.

The investigation will now examine who exactly authorized the shipment, and why there was a failure in ensuring the quality of the rice before it was allowed into the country.

While oil exports have surged by 20%, the country's overall economic growth has been sluggish, the economy squeezed by global sanctions.

In the first half of the current fiscal year, Iran's GDP growth was half of last year's rate. The agricultural sector, which has already been underperforming due to droughts and power shortages, has been particularly hard hit.

Despite these challenges, official figures continue to report growth, leading some analysts to question the accuracy and honesty of the data provided by the Central Bank of Iran.

The rice scandal also underscores the growing frustration among ordinary Iranians, feeling the pinch from rising food costs, despite government assurances of stability.

The Government Trading Corporation, tasked with safeguarding the nation's strategic reserves, now faces questions about its oversight of critical imports. The Ministry of Agriculture’s ambiguous stance on the issue—treating it as a business dispute rather than a regulatory failure—has only fueled doubts about the accountability of state-run institutions.

"The government's goal in raising the official exchange rate from 550,000 to approximately 640,000 rials per dollar was to sell the $5 billion it had taken from the National Development Fund at the highest price and, which means earning about 1 quadrillion rials from people's pockets," Hossein Samsami was quoted by Tasnim news agency as saying.

However, the Islamic Republic faces real economic pitfalls that have devastated the currency in the past 45 years. From a high of 70 rials for each US dollar in 1978, the currency was trading close to 800,000 per one dollar on Wednesday in Tehran's free market. In addition to its usual weaknesses, the economy has been hit hard with US sanctions since 2018.

In Iran's heavily state-controlled economy, the government has historically dominated foreign currency supply and import controls. Since 2012, when international sanctions triggered a sharp devaluation of the Iranian rial, the government has struggled to keep essential imports affordable.

To manage this, it implemented a multiple exchange rate system, which has become a breeding ground for corruption. Insiders with government-granted privileges, such as import-export licenses, have profited from the difference between the lower official exchange rate and the higher free market rate.

For example, the exchange rate of the dollar in the free market was nearly 800,000 rials per US dollar on Wednesday but the government-sanctioned rate was about 650,000 rials.

A portion of Iran's imports, such as medicine, is currently done using the government-subsidized rate of around 285,000 rials per US dollar, while other imports, like food, are conducted at different rates such as the "NIMA" system, which was about 500,000 rials per dollar until President Masoud Pezeshkian’s government raised it earlier this month. The move was justified as one step towards a unified rate to curb corruption.

Samsami’s accusation suggests the government is prioritizing short-term revenue generation over long-term economic stability and public welfare. He argued that simply unifying the exchange rate—the stated policy goal—will be ineffective without addressing deeper systemic issues.

"The policy of unifying the exchange rate," he emphasized, "will not be successful without implementing its requirements, such as implementing the law on combating smuggling of goods and currency, combating money laundering, and capital flight."

Samsami also challenged the claim that the exchange rates, designed to subsidize essential goods, are not reaching their intended beneficiaries.

However, he acknowledged the complexities of the system, noting that domestically produced goods, such as chicken, are still vulnerable to price increases.

"Domestically produced chicken, one-third of whose costs are covered by the 285,000-rial exchange rate and two-thirds by the NIMA and free market exchange rates, will see its production costs increase if the Nima and free market exchange rates rise,” Samsami explained.

He concluded with a stark warning about the inflationary consequences of the government's currency policy.

"With the government's jump in the official exchange rate, we will witness a wave of inflation in the next two to three months," he predicted. This prediction aligns with economic principles that link currency devaluation to rising import costs and broader price increases.

The compensation is intended for “the Syrian people and the Syrian state, for the harm caused by Tehran’s ‘criminal and arbitrary’ policies to the Syrians and the Syrian infrastructure during its military alignment with its militias in favor of the regime of the ousted president, Bashar al-Assad,” Al-Modon quoted an unnamed source close to Syria’s new political administration as saying.

While Syria accuses Iran of causing extensive harm to its people and infrastructure, Iranian politicians are grappling with the opposite concern—the potential loss of billions Iran invested in propping up Bashar al-Assad’s government.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei addressed these concerns last week, dismissing claims that Syria owes Iran between $30 and $50 billion, calling the figures exaggerated. He explained that any debts would transfer to Syria’s new political system under the principle of state succession. “These figures, such as the claim of a $50 billion debt owed to Iran by Syria, are truly very exaggerated,” Baghaei said.

Conflicting reports about Iranian embassy reopening

Adding to the tension, an Al-Modon source denied any ongoing communication between the Iranian government and Syria’s new administration. The source said, “Communication between the new administration and Iran is completely cut off,” and added, “The new administration has no current plans to engage with Iran, whether regarding an embassy in Damascus or a consulate in Aleppo.”

This is while, the Iranian government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani on Tuesday said that Iran is in talks to reopen its embassy in Damascus.