EU Coordinator Meets Iran’s Top Nuclear Negotiator In Tehran

Hossein Amir-Abdollahina in an interview had said that IRGC commanders do not object if the government gives up its demand from the US to remove the military organization from its Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list.

"I couldn't have spoken more clearly about the pivotal role of the honorable Revolutionary Guards," Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said in an Instagram post Sunday after an uproar about his remarks in a televised interview Saturday. "The issue is not compromising or making a concession over red lines. I suggest re-examination of my interview yesterday," he wrote.

Amir-Abdollahian's remarks Saturday were widely misunderstood by some media and pundits. Some thought he was declaring that the IRGC had given the green light to the government to make a concession in Vienna nuclear talks and not demand the removal of the IRGC from the US FTO list.

Iran International did report that the Iranian foreign minister was not suggesting a retreat from Tehran's demand in his Saturday remarks.

Amir-Abdollahian did claim on Saturday that senior Revolutionary Guard officials always tell the government that it should do whatever it deems necessary to secure the country's national interests and not to prioritize the issue of the IRGC and called it "self-sacrifice on the part of the IRGC". However, he added that despite having the "permission" from the IRGC, the government continues to consider its removal from the US list of terror organizations a "major issue" in the talks.

This was the first time Amir-Abdollahian clearly referred to IRGC terror listing as a main issue in the talks.

At the Doha Forum Sunday, the US Special Representative for Iran, Robert Malley, said he could not be confident a deal to restore the 2015 nuclear deal, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), is imminent.

“We haven’t decided to delist the IRGC. The sooner we get back into the deal -- we think it’s in our interest to be back in a deal and we think Iran’s too -- the more faithfully we can implement it.”

"This is a nuclear deal, we’re lifting those sanctions. It’s not intending to address other issues like Iran’s regional policy and other sanctions," Malley said.

Former foreign minister and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s senior advisor Kamal Kharrazi told the Doha Forum on Sunday that a nuclear deal between Iran and world powers was imminent but insisted that a deal was possible only if US showed "political will" and removed the IRGC from its FTO list. "IRGC is a national army, so its being listed as a terror group is not acceptable," he said.

The misinterpretation, or imprecise quotation, of Amir-Abdollahian's Saturday remarks caused scathing criticism from some hardliners in Iran. The ultra-hardliner chief editor of Kayhan newspaper, Hossein Shariatmadari, harshly attacked Amir-Abdollahian although his remarks were clear enough that the demand to delist the IRGC was still on the table. Shariatmadari, appointed by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, said to forgo the IRGC delisting was "surrender", not "sacrifice".

The ultra-hardliner called the foreign minister's remarks "very odd and unexpected". "These remarks could suggest that Iran's foreign minister is not blessed with the adequate and necessary command of current affairs in his domain of responsibility," he wrote and urged IRGC commanders to correct the foreign minister's remarks by offering a "candid and quick explanation.

In an editorial note in January Shariatmadari berated Amir-Abdollahian, as well as the Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Shamkhani, when they hinted at the possibility of direct talks with the United States. Shamkhani, according to Kayhan, backed down from his position but Amir-Abdollahian did not respond to the criticism.

"We have disagreements about a nuclear agreement and its consequences, but open and honest dialogue is part of the strength of our friendship. Israel and the United States will continue to work together to prevent a nuclear Iran”, Lapid said during a joint press conference with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

An unnamed Israeli official has said the multilateral meeting between the US, UAE, Bahrain, Morocco and Egypt on Sunday has a clear message for the Islamic Republic.

Egypt and Jordan were not formally invited to the meeting that is described as a summit for the signatories of the Abraham Accords, the normalization pacts which US brokered between Israel and several Arab states.

On Friday, Jordan’s King Abdullah II hosted Abu Dhabi Crown Prince Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi, and Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhemi in the Red Sea port city of Aqaba for a “consultative brotherly meeting dealt with recent international and regional developments”.

Leaders of Egypt, Israel and the United Arab Emirates also met on March 22 in the Egyptian resort town of Sharm el-Sheikh.

Except a mention of the Ukraine crisis and Iran, there is little information about what were discussed in all these meetings before Blinken’s arrival in the region but it could be part of efforts to present a united regional front on Iran issues.

A senior advisor to Iran's Supreme Leader said on Sunday that a nuclear deal between Tehran and world powers was imminent but could only happen if the United States showed political will.

"Yes, it's imminent. It depends on the political view of the United States," Kamal Kharrazi said at the Doha Forum international conference.

Kharrazi said it was vital for Washington to remove the foreign terrorist organization (FTO) designation against its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

"IRGC is a national army and a national army being listed as a terrorist group certainly is not acceptable," he said.

The Biden Administration has hesitated over the issue, possibly because of its domestic backlash. If the administration takes such a step and days or weeks later the IRGC or its militant proxies in the region attack a country, President Joe Biden will be held responsible and blamed for being soft on Iran and miscalculating Tehran's intentions.

There are plenty of recent examples of Iranian aggressions. The IRGC lobbed 12 ballistic missiles at Erbil, in Iraqi Kurdistan this month claiming it targeted a secret Israeli base there. Houthi rebels armed and trained by IRGC attacked Saudi oil installations on Friday causing large fires.

Removing the biggest cross-border military, intelligence group controlling dozens of militant groups in the region from a terror list does not guarantee they will change their behavior. On the contrary, critics say such a move will embolden them.

Already, bipartisan opposition is growing against the Vienna talks, especially any notion of removing the IRGC from the US terrorist designation.

After 11 months of negotiations with Iran, the Biden Administration now finds itself caught between the hammer and the anvil and has become more cautious about the possible outcome of the talks.

US Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley attending the Doha conference said that he is not confident a nuclear deal between Western powers and Iran is imminent.

"The sooner we get back into the deal, which is in our interest, and presumably Iran's interest, the more faithfully we implement it, and the more we can build on it to address the other issues between us and Iran and between Iran and the region," Malley said on Sunday.

He also made clear that the United States is negotiating to revive the 2015 nuclear agreement, and this is not “intending to address other issues” like Iran’s regional policy and other sanctions – a possible reference to Tehran’s demand over IRGC’s terror sanctions.

When former president Donald Trump withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018, his administration imposed nearly 1,500 sanctions until the very end of his presidency. The most painful economic sanctions are related to Iran’s nuclear program and will be lifted if the agreement is revived. But the US has consistently said terrorism, human rights and other sanctions will not be lifted. Iran, on the other hand, has always demanded the removal of all sanctions.

The US hopes to use the remainder to negotiate with Tehran over its aggressive regional policies and ballistic missile program. However, critics have been saying that once Iran is free of the major economic sanctions, it would have little incentive to moderate its behavior or make concession over the missile issue.

In an interview with state television Saturday, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said that removing individuals and entities from "the US red list and list of unilateral sanctions, such as certain holdings and state entities, as well as the IRGC" is one of Iran's main issues in the Vienna talks to restore the 2015 nuclear deal, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Some had suggested that perhaps Washington would agree to remove the IRGC from its Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list but keep existing sanctions on individuals and entities affiliated with. But the Iranian foreign minister’s remarks show Tehran also wants companies, banks and persons to be removed from any sanction’s designation.

Amir-Abdollahian also accused the US of making "excessive demands" which, he said, have hindered the negotiations. He said he has discussed these issues with the EU foreign policy chief, Josep Borrell, and told him that Iranians could also "make demands".

"Regarding the IRGC, what is important is to acknowledge the standing and the central role of the IRGC in our security and defense. [Negotiators] relayed some messages to the US," he said.

Amir-Abdollahian also claimed that senior Revolutionary Guard officials always tell the government that it should do whatever it deems necessary to secure the country's national interests and not to prioritize the issue of the IRGC. "This is self-sacrifice on the part of the IRGC."

He added that despite having the "permission" from the IRGC authorities not to pursue the matter, the government continues to consider the removal of the military force from the US list of terror organizations a "major issue" in the talks.

This was the first time Amir-Abdollahian clearly referred to IRGC terror listing as a main issue in the talks. At a meeting with the Lebanese Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri in Beirut.

On Thursday the foreign minister said Iran would not surrender its "redlines" in the Vienna talks. But he did not explain what the redlines were and made no mention of the issue of the IRGC issue.

The Trump administration listed the IRGC as a terrorist organization as part of his ‘maximum pressure’ after he withdrew from the JCPOA in 2018.

Prospects of delisting the IRGC have raised many objections in the US and the tone in Washington is no longer as optimistic as before regarding the success of the talks. Friday’s large-scale and destructive Houthi drone and missile attacks on Saudi Arabia’s oil facilities in Jeddah is bound to make it less likely for the Biden Administration to entertain the idea of making concessions regarding the IRGC.

Amir-Abdollahian reiterated that the talks have made great progress on lifting the US sanctions and that an agreement is within reach if the Washington "adopts a realistic approach".

Referring to recent controversies over Russia's demand to be exempted from US sanctions over Ukraine in its economic dealings with Iran, Amir-Abdollahian said China and Russia are "for an agreement".

Deputy EU Foreign Policy Chief Enrique Mora arrived in Tehran Saturday for talks to explore possible solutions to remaining disagreements. He will reportedly visit Washington after later to confer with US officials.

In a Twitter post Friday, Mora said he would hold talks with Iran’s lead negotiator Ali Bagheri-Kani during his visit to Tehran as part of efforts towards “closing the remaining gaps” in the Vienna talks. "We must conclude this negotiation. Much is at stake," he wrote.

In a letter on Friday, Rubio called on the president to support energy projects in democratic nations in the Western Hemisphere, such as in Guyana, a democratic nation in South America.

Rubio criticized the Biden Administration for choosing not to lend to a project in Guyana, saying it would have helped address rising energy prices in the United States by supporting an expansion of Guyana’s capacity to produce and export more oil.

“Instead of supporting common sense projects that would strengthen our relationship with our allies and help the energy crisis at home, your administration is working behind closed doors to lift sanctions on the fossil fuel industries controlled by the Maduro regime in Venezuela and the Ayatollahs in Iran”, he said.

“I urge you, before seeking to convince bloodthirsty dictators to enter into misguided deals, explore supporting projects in democratic countries that actually want to work closer with us. Doing so will require no moral compromise on our part, while still reaping benefits for the American people”, the letter concluded.

Republicans and some Democrats have been criticizing the Biden team for their drawn-out talks with Iran to restore the 2015 nuclear agreement, JCPOA, arguing that it is an expiring agreement for which the US has to lift sanctions imposed on an anti-American regime.