Ghalibaf warns US of strong response if military action taken


Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf warned that the country would respond forcefully if the United States takes military action during ongoing negotiations.
“If Washington decides on military action during negotiations, it will face a decisive and strong response from our forces,” he said in remarks aired by state television, adding that Iran has never sought nuclear weapons and will not do so.







New Zealand imposed further sanctions on Iran on Wednesday, placing travel bans on 40 Iranian officials and others accused of involvement in suppression of protests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said.
The bans target Interior Minister Eskandar Momeni, Intelligence Minister Esmail Khatib and Prosecutor-General Mohammad Movahedi-Azad, as well as members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps among others.
“It has been horrifying to witness the brutal killing of thousands of protestors in Iran,” Peters said, adding that Iranians’ rights to peaceful protest and freedom of expression had been “ruthlessly violated.”
Peters said the measures align Wellington with Australia, Britain, the European Union, Canada and the United States.
A stuffed rat hung by protesting students at Tehran’s Sharif University and removed by a Basij-affiliated student signaled that supporters of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei have effectively acknowledged and amplified a mocking nickname that chips away at his authority.
Students at several Iranian universities held a third consecutive day of protests on Monday, chanting against Ali Khamenei. At Amir Kabir, Tehran and Alzahra universities, students set fire to the flag of the Islamic Republic. At some of these universities, including Tehran University, Basij forces attacked students.
The image – a Basij-aligned student climbing up to pull down a stuffed animal – spread quickly online. More than a campus scuffle, it suggested a phrase that began on social media is now being contested in the physical arena of protest and counter-mobilization.
From meme to material symbol
The nickname Rat-Ali gained traction during the June war with Israel, when Khamenei largely disappeared from public view and state media aired only prerecorded video messages. Reports that he had taken shelter in fortified underground facilities during military escalation and later unrest fueled the metaphor.
In Persian, “moush” connotes hiding and evasion. By pairing it with the Supreme Leader’s name, critics flip the state’s image of firm leadership.
On Monday, that inversion took tangible form. The rat was not only an online meme but an object displayed and physically removed.
Political satire often loses force when ignored. Authority can neutralize insult through indifference. The decision by a Basiji student to climb the tree and take down the toy had the opposite effect: it signaled that the symbol was perceived as threatening enough to confront.
Precedent in protest language
Iran’s protest culture has repeatedly transformed ridicule into durable shorthand. After the 2020 US drone strike that killed IRGC Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani, some Iranians referred to him as “cutlet,” a darkly comic reference to the condition of his remains. The term proved difficult to suppress despite official efforts to preserve Soleimani’s image as a national icon.
However, Moush-Ali carries sharper political implications because it targets the apex of the system. Khamenei’s authority rests not only on constitutional powers but also on cultivated distance – a blend of religious stature and institutional control.
Mockery compresses that distance. A rat hanging from a tree reduces a figure positioned as untouchable into a repeatable visual punchline.
Authoritarian systems rely in part on aura – an impression of inevitability and psychological dominance. When that aura becomes vulnerable to parody, the cost of reaction rises. Suppression can amplify visibility; indifference can appear weak.
The scene at Sharif involved a toy, a tree and a handful of students. Yet the rapid spread of the image suggested a broader recalibration of political language.
Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, said failure to reach an agreement between the United States and Iran could lead to the use of force.
“The message is that it is not impossible to reach an agreement that avoids more disruption, more deaths, more instability in the region,” Grossi said in an interview with RTVC Noticias. He added that the goal is to ensure “there are no nuclear weapons in Iran by any other path than violence.”
Grossi said the crisis must be resolved through a deal but warned that uncertainty over Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile increases risks. He said the IAEA has not been able to resume inspections of Iran’s enriched uranium since last year’s 12-day war, adding that while this does not mean nuclear weapons exist, the lack of monitoring “can generate dramatic decisions,” he told RTVC Noticias director William Parra after a visit to Colombia and ahead of talks in Geneva.
Political commentator Sadegh Zibakalam on Wednesday expressed shock at pro-Pahlavi stance voiced by Iran’s university students, saying he never imagined such slogans would be heard on campus.
“As a professor who taught the history of modern Iran’s political developments at university for 30 years, I could not have imagined even in my dreams that a university which, since Dec. 7, 1953, had always chanted against the Pahlavis would, after 82 years, out of anger and hatred, return to the Pahlavis,” wrote the professor and reformist figure on X.
Students at Iran’s major universities have been staging anti-government protests on campuses, calling for regime change and voicing support for exiled Prince Reza Pahlavi.
Iran accused the United States and Israel of running a coordinated disinformation campaign against Tehran, dismissing allegations about its nuclear program, ballistic missiles and the death toll from January protests.
Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei cited “law of propaganda coined by Nazi Joseph Goebbels,” in a post on X on Wednesday and said, “This is now systematically used by the US administration and the war profiteers encircling it, particularly the genocidal Israeli regime, to serve their sinister disinformation & misinformation campaign against the Nation of Iran.”
“Whatever they're alleging in regards to Iran's nuclear program, Iran's ballistic missiles, and the number of casualties during January's unrest is simply the repetition of 'big lies',” he added.