Republican Senator Says Iran Nuclear Deal 'Is Horrible'

"Our talks with Iran have reached an urgent point," White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters, noting that the US special envoy for Iran, Rob Malley, has returned to Vienna for indirect talks with Iran on both sides resuming compliance with the pact.

"A deal that addresses the core concerns of all sides is in sight, but if it's not reached in the coming weeks Iran's ongoing nuclear advances will make it impossible for us to return to the JCPOA," she said, referring to the deal by the acronym for its official name, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Psaki's comments echoed those of a senior U.S. State Department official who told reporters on Jan. 31 that "we only have a handful of weeks left" to revive the agreement.

Under the accord, Iran restricted its nuclear program to make it harder to obtain the fissile material to make a bomb. In return, the United States and other nations eased sanctions that have crippled Iran's economy.

Former US President Donald Trump abandoned the deal in 2018, arguing that it had failed to stop Iran's support for regional proxies and gave Tehran too much sanctions relief for the nuclear restrictions. He then restored U.S. sanctions, prompting Iran to begin violating the deal's nuclear limits a year later.

Reporting by Reuters

With talks resumed Tuesday, the United States special Iran envoy Rob Malley took time Wednesday to give a classified briefing to members of Congress on talks in Vienna to revive the 2015 JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), which the US left in 2018.

Republican opponents of the JCPOA were left unimpressed. Senator Ted Cruz told an Iran International reporter that "I'm deeply concerned this administration is bound & determined to cut a deal, no matter how bad it is. It's catastrophically dangerous. Weakness and appeasement of our enemy does not work."

Republican House member Claudia Tenney said Malley’s briefing had left her with "more questions than answers" and demanded the envoy testify openly to give details of what the US was “offering” in Vienna.

By contrast, Democratic Party Senator Chris Murphy said that what Malley had said about Iran’s expanding nuclear program outside JCPOA limits had been “sobering and shocking” and had confirmed his support for reviving it.

Officials in President Joe Biden’s administration have referred to importance of consulting both with overseas allies and at home. Jalina Porter, the State department principal deputy spokesperson, told a press briefing Tuesday that Biden considered “a bipartisan approach to Iran” as “the strongest way to safeguard US interests for the long term.”

Porter promised that a US return to the JCPOA would involve considering legal implications, including the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, which Republican senators this week pointed out requires the president to submit to Congress any ‘new’ agreement.

In Vienna, with talks resuming Tuesday after a break since January 28, several officials claimed that agreement on restoring the deal was in sight.White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters Wednesday that talks were at an urgent point.

CNN cited three US officials Wednesday that agreement was needed by the end of February before the US “changed tack.” Tehran has consistently rejected what it calls “artificial deadlines.”

Describing the Vienna process Tuesday, the European foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said there had been a “US offer” and a “counteroffer.” He said both Iran and the US had been “showing willingness” as the final stage approached: "I don't know if it's going to be one week, two weeks, three weeks, but certainly we are in the last steps of the negotiation."

Limiting ‘break out’ time

Speculation this week has centered on the ‘break out’ time the US would require as underlying any renewed agreement. When the JCPOA was inked in 2015, US experts calculated the deal’s restrictions meant it would take Iran a year to assemble enough sufficiently enriched uranium for a crude bomb.

A restored JCPOA would not achieve the same break out time as in 2015, experts say, because of the advances Iran has made in its expertise, but they say it would extend the current break out time, which some put at weeks rather than months.

“Even if the original terms of the JCPOA can be reimposed, Iran will have cleared many of the technical hurdles that enabled the original agreement to put Iran at least one year away from a weapons capability,” Jon Wolfsthal, a special advisor to Vice-President Biden on nonproliferation,” wrote this week in the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists. “An inability to recreate a one-year breakout timeline is the price that the world must pay for President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the carefully negotiated and verified agreement.”

In a tweet on Wednesday, Secretary of the Supreme National Security Council Ali Shamkhani said, “Voices from the US government show that there is no coherence in the country to make political decisions in the direction of advancement in the Vienna Talks”.

He added that “the US administration cannot pay for its internal disputes by violating Iran's legal rights”.

Shamkhani’s comments were in reaction to Republican senators warning that they would work to thwart any new Iran deal if President Joe Biden did not allow Congress to review and vote on any new nuclear deal with Iran.

Led by Senator Ted Cruz, a long-time opponent of the nuclear deal, the senators told Biden in a letter on Monday that they would use "the full range of options and leverage available" to ensure that his government adhered to US laws governing any new accord with Iran.

Republican lawmakers have been warning Biden from the early days of his administration when he criticized his predecessor’s decision to pull out of the Joint Comprehensive plan of Action (JCPOA) and begin talks with Iran to restore the agreement.

Republicans have argued that the JCPOA was a weak arrangement that did not prevent Iran from ultimately acquiring nuclear weapons and did not cover other issues, such as Tehran’s ballistic missiles and its aggressive regional policies through its proxies.

Several media outlets, including Fars News, cited an “informed source” in the ministry refuting claims on social media platforms that Hossein Amir-Abdollahian had written to Ali Khamenei to complain about interference in the Vienna talks.

This was probably a response to a claim on the Chand Sanieh website Tuesdaythat Amir-Abdollahian had written a letter to complain that Saeed Jalili, the former top security official 2007-13 who led nuclear talks with Europe, was damaging the process underway in Vienna to revive the 2015 deal, the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action).

According to Chand Sanieh, an unnamed "revolutionary" social media channel recently claimed that the foreign minister had "seriously complained" to Khamenei, in written form and verbally, about the attacks of the so-called "Jalili Group" on the negotiation team and accused them of "creating hurdles" in the ongoing nuclear talks in Vienna to restore the 2015 nuclear deal, Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Iranian media had reported a long letter from Jalili, a veteran conservative, to Khamenei expressing opposition to the Vienna talks. While some have suggested Jalili has kept a distance from the negotiators, Ali Bagheri-Kani, the lead negotiation, has been described as a Jalili ally.

Dumping Bagheri

In a commentary asking "Will Jalili Dump Bagheri?," the reformist Shargh daily February 1 claimed Jalili had proposed in the letter that Iran boost uranium enrichment to 90 percent –considered ‘weapons grade’ – as a means to negotiate the lifting of United States ‘maximum pressure’ sanctions, with Russia and China meanwhile blocking any moves to restore United Nations sanctions.

Shargh quoted its own "informed source" that Jalili had written his missive after failing to convince Amir-Abdollahian and Bagheri-Kani to leave the Vienna talks.

In a speech Tuesday to Basij militia students, Jalili said he was often in correspondence with Khamenei and had written six months ago to criticize the Hassan Rouhani government's approach to the nuclear talks. He said that making a controversy of his known opposition to the talks "when the enemy has confessed its defeat" amounted to sedition.

The Vienna talks face opposition in the US as well as in Iran. During his first classified debriefing on Capitol Hill Tuesday, President Joe Biden's Iran envoy Robert Malley faced questioning from Republicans slamming last week’s decision to reinstate US sanctions waivers ‘allowing’ foreign firms to carry out non-proliferation work on Iran’s nuclear program.

One Republican, Claudia Tenney, said she was left with "more questions than answers" and demanded Malley immediately testify in an open setting on what exactly the US was offering Iran in the Vienna talks. The Biden administration has said it will lift US sanctions incompatible with the JCPOA if Tehran restricts its nuclear program to JCPOA limits, including a 3.67 percent cap on uranium enrichment.

Negotiations that started ten months ago in Vienna have made little progress and US official say the current round of talks that started on Tuesday are crucial to see if an agreement is possible.

Iran left the negotiations in June for five months, saying its new president needed time to organize his government, as it continued to enrich uranium and increase leverage. US and Western diplomat began issuing warnings about time running out six months ago, but they did not set a deadline on the negotiating process.

One official speaking to CNN said, "We made progress narrowing down the list of differences to just the key priorities on all sides. And that's why now is the time for political decisions.”

They were hints that end of January would be the deadline to make a breakthrough, then mid-February was mentioned and now officials are setting end of this month as a possible cutoff date when Washington has to make a decision about continuing the talks.

US lawmakers are increasingly questioning the administration's strategy in holding talks with Iran.

CNN said that a failure to salvage JCPOA would be considered “a major blow” to President Joe Biden’s foreign policy, after the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.