Azerbaijan says it foiled alleged IRGC plot

In the messages attributed to Zarif, the former top diplomat outlined a series of proposals related to Iran’s confrontation with the United States and Israel, including military pressure, diplomatic steps and measures he said could help stabilize the situation.

Zarif wrote that Iran should focus on striking “American and Israeli targets,” including US naval vessels and what he described as vital interests linked to Israel.

"We should focus on destroying the bridge between Saudi Arabia and Bahrain in order to create real deterrence against mischief in the islands, and on striking the UAE (despite all the damage it might cause Iran)."

"The UAE and Israel are one and the same," he said.

The remarks also included a recommendation that Iran avoid attacks across the wider region “as much as possible,” while concentrating on specific targets that he said would have strategic impact.

Alongside military proposals, Zarif also suggested diplomatic and political steps. He wrote that mediation proposals should not be rejected and that Washington should be given an opportunity for what he described as an “honorable exit.”

He added that, despite his personal discomfort in saying so, the only move that might calm Trump would be an official declaration ending the “47-year hostility” between Iran and the United States and its allies.

Zarif wrote that US President Donald Trump “does not have the patience for long and technical plans” and that symbolic gestures might be more effective.

"To prevent war, I proposed several symbolic steps aimed at giving Trump a sense of victory, accompanied by a text that was very dignified for Iran. However, it was not even reviewed, and no explanation was requested."

He criticized what he described as a lack of engagement from incumbent Iranian officials, saying that since the start of the war he had not received any calls from his former colleagues at the foreign ministry regarding his proposals.

From Chinese fortune teller to quantum effect

Zarif, a US-educated university professor in Tehran, also mixed religious appeals with conspiracy claims, suggesting that prayers and repeated calls to prayer could help defeat what he called the “satanic schemes” of Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu.

"Without joking, we should pray for the realization of the prediction that Trump will be defeated (as foretold by a Chinese fortune teller). Belief in God’s support has a situational (quantum) effect."

"At the suggestion of one of the saints, the call to prayer should be recited repeatedly so that the satanic schemes of Trump and Netanyahu — which, according to him, began by sacrificing 200 little girls (in the Epstein method) to achieve their evil goals — may be nullified," he said.

In the same message, Zarif emphasized the importance of public opinion inside Iran, urging officials to avoid actions that would anger different segments of society.

“We must win the people’s hearts through action, not words,” he wrote, adding that authorities should avoid provoking the public to satisfy the demands of a particular group.

“It is not simply enough to degrade part of their arsenal,” Cruz told Eye for Iran podcast, adding that strikes have weakened Iran’s military capabilities and limited its ability to project force abroad.

Asked whether victory would mean regime change, he said: “Yeah, I believe this regime needs to be removed from power,” and argued that doing so would serve US national security interests and support Iranians seeking freedom.

Cruz said the United States and Israel had acted in coordination in recent days.

"We've seen the United States working hand in hand with Israel taking out, number one, the Ayatollah, number two, the senior military leaders of the regime, number three, a great percentage of the missile reserves of the drones,” he said.

“We have seen steadily the regime's ability to project force, to terrorize the Iranian people, to murder their neighbors, to murder Americans, all of those have been reduced dramatically.”

His comments come as the Trump administration signals the campaign could intensify. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said this week the United States has “only just begun to fight,” while Iran’s Revolutionary Guards warned attacks across the region would escalate.

Freedom “on the doorstep”

Cruz argued that removing Iran’s ruling regime would serve both US national security interests and the aspirations of Iranians living under the tyrinical government.

“Removing from power a government that is seeking to kill Americans is overwhelmingly in America's interest,” he said, adding that it was also “overwhelmingly in the interest of the people of Iran of 92 million people who have suffered under tyranny and oppression for 47 years… and I believe freedom is on the doorstep and it is in sight before us.”

More than 36,500 Iranians were killed by security forces during the January 8-9 crackdown on nationwide protests, making it the deadliest two-day protest massacre in history.

The Republican Senator also suggested Iran’s military response across the region is backfiring and strengthening opposition to the regime.

“Well, Iran is doing a great job of building a coalition against this regime,” Cruz said. “You look at their military strategy, their military strategy appears to be try to murder as many people as possible and in as many countries as possible.”

Iran’s missile and drone attacks have spread across the region in recent days, with projectiles reported over or targeting Israel, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Jordan, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Cyprus.

Some strikes and falling debris have also hit residential areas, highlighting how the conflict is spilling beyond military targets and affecting civilians across the region.

Limited ground engagement possible

Cruz also addressed speculation about whether the United States could deploy ground troops, saying he does not foresee an Iraq-style invasion but did not rule out limited ground action.

“Look, what we're not going to see is an extended presence of American troops on the ground. We're not going see a replay of what happened in the war in Iraq. That is not on the table,” he said.

“The president has been clear he has not ruled out some limited ground engagement… I could envision it is possible the president will order some sort of limited ground engagements, but I would expect the overwhelming majority of the American engagement on this to be in the air through bombs and missiles and other means.”

Iran’s leadership question

The question of Iran’s leadership has taken on new urgency following the death of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

Iran’s clerical body, the Assembly of Experts, has elected Mojtaba Khamenei — the son of the late supreme leader Ali Khamenei — as the Islamic Republic’s new Supreme Leader, according to informed sources who spoke to Iran International.

The decision would keep power firmly within the ruling system of the Islamic Republic and extend the authority of the clerical establishment that has governed Iran since 1979.

President Donald Trump signaled strong opposition to Mojtaba Khamenei assuming power.

“Khamenei's son is a lightweight. I have to be involved in the appointment, like with Delcy Rodriguez in Venezuela,” Trump said.

“We want someone that will bring harmony and peace to Iran.”

Asked during his interview about who should lead Iran next, Cruz said he would not speculate about specific figures but noted there were multiple possible contenders.

“Look, I don't know, and I think that's a decision for the people of Iran to make. And so there are various contenders,” Cruz said.

Cruz said he believes Iran’s current ruling system should ultimately be replaced by leadership chosen by the Iranian people.

“Yeah, I believe this regime needs to be removed from power,” he said.

“What I would like to see is a free and fair election, let the people of Iran choose their leaders.”

Message to the Iranian people

Cruz also spoke about his personal connection to people who have lived under authoritarian rule.

“My father was born and grew up in Cuba. My father fought in the Cuban revolution. My father was imprisoned and tortured in Cuba,” he said. “My family knows suffering the people of Iran have experienced.”

He ended with a message to Iranians protesting the government.

“My message to the Iranian people is your courage is inspiring… You have a moment to reclaim your country, to reclaim your future and to move into an era of prosperity.”

“UNICEF is deeply concerned about the deadly impact the ongoing military escalation in Iran is having on children,” the agency said in a statement. “Approximately 180 children have reportedly been killed and many more injured.”

The organization said 168 girls were killed when a strike hit the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ elementary school in Minab, in southern Iran, on Feb. 28 while classes were in session.

Reports indicated that most of those killed were between 7 and 12 years old.

UNICEF also said 12 other children were killed in separate incidents at schools across five locations in Iran and warned that at least 20 schools and 10 hospitals had reportedly been damaged.

Reuters reported Thursday evening that US ​military investigators believe it is likely that US forces were responsible for the strike.

The report cited two officials who said the investigation was not completed and "new evidence could emerge that absolves the ‌U.S. of responsibility and points to another responsible party in the incident."

The New York Times also said on Thursday that it had verified video footage and satellite imagery showing the Minab school was struck during US-led attacks near an Iranian naval facility, making it one of the deadliest incidents of the campaign.

It said the building had long functioned as a clearly defined civilian school despite its proximity to a former military complex.

US officials have said the War Department is investigating reports of civilian casualties but have neither confirmed nor denied responsibility for the Minab strike.

Strikes began last week as US and Israeli forces targeted sites across Iran, with Tehran retaliating with missile and drone attacks across the region.

“These child casualties are a stark reminder of the brutality of war and violence on children, which impacts families and communities for generations,” UNICEF said, adding that schools and children are protected under international humanitarian law and must remain places of safety.

“They’re calling. They’re saying, how do we make a deal?” Trump said in remarks to reporters. “I said, you’re being a little bit late, and we want to fight now more than they do.”

The comments came after nearly a week of escalating exchanges in which US and Israeli forces struck targets across Iran while Tehran retaliated with missile and drone attacks across the region, raising fears of a broader Middle East war.

Trump framed the campaign as a decisive military effort, boasting of American power and claiming Iran had suffered sweeping losses.

“Their navy is gone,” he said. “Their anti-aircraft weapons are gone. So they have no Air Force. They have no air defense.”

Earlier Wednesday, Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said Tehran was not seeking a ceasefire and saw no reason to negotiate.

“We are not asking for ceasefire. We don’t see any reason why we should negotiate when we negotiated with them twice and every time they attacked us in the middle of negotiations,” Araghchi told NBC News.

He also challenged Washington to attempt a ground invasion, saying Iran was prepared to confront US forces.

Araghchi later wrote on social media that Washington had squandered a diplomatic opening.

“Plan A for a clean rapid military victory failed, Mr. President. Your Plan B will be even bigger failure,” he said, adding that a “unique deal” had been lost after what he called the intervention of an “‘America Last’ cabal.”

Trump also urged defections from within Iran’s security establishment, calling on members of the Revolutionary Guards, military and police to lay down their arms and promising immunity to those who did so.

He said he wanted to see Iranians “take back” their country and added that the United States would ensure whoever leads Iran next “will not threaten America or its neighbors.”

The exchange underscored the widening gap between Washington and Tehran as diplomacy gives way to a fast-moving military confrontation whose scope continues to expand.

The Charity Commission said charities could be affected in different ways by the “volatile situation” in Iran and the wider Middle East and urged trustees to carefully assess the risks of political activity, public statements and overseas operations.

The watchdog said organizations working in or commenting on Iran should be mindful that individuals and groups in the country are subject to sanctions and other restrictions under UK law.

“As a civil regulator we will respond robustly to evidence of links between charities and extremism or terrorism,” a Charity Commission statement said. “We will make referrals to other agencies where appropriate including where there is evidence of criminality.”

Trustees were reminded that any political activity must directly support a charity’s stated purpose and comply with regulations governing campaigning and social media use.

“In the current context, the Commission urges charities to be careful to ensure that any political activity they are involved in furthers their charity’s objects and complies with our guidance,” the regulator said.

The statement comes amid longstanding concerns in Britain that networks connected to Iran have used charities and religious organizations to promote political influence.

Several UK-based charities have faced investigations in recent years over alleged links to groups aligned with Tehran.

• 

  Iran-linked groups are exploiting Britain’s charity sector, UK lawmaker says

• 

  Western charity scrutiny tests line between faith, foreign influence

• 

  UK Shi'ite camp with alleged Iran ties cancelled after right-wing outcry

In 2024, the Charity Commission opened a compliance case involving the London-based Dar Alhekma Trust and the Abrar Islamic Foundation following a dossier alleging connections to organizations backed by Iran. Both groups deny wrongdoing.

Other organizations have drawn political criticism over activities seen by some lawmakers as promoting narratives aligned with the Islamic Republic. Conservative MP Bob Blackman last year accused Iran-linked groups of exploiting Britain’s charity sector to expand influence and “sow discord” in local communities.

Security officials and lawmakers have also warned that Tehran has used networks in Europe to extend ideological influence, even as regulators emphasize the need to balance scrutiny with protections for lawful religious and charitable activity.