The study, titled "Ballistic Fakes: Disinformation and Fact-Checking Efforts during the Israel-Iran War", analyzed the work of fact-checking organizations in 23 countries.
Among the most active were Misbar in Jordan, AFP in France, Newschecker in India and Teyit in Turkey — each contributing a significant volume of war-related fact-checks.
In assessing the motivations behind the spread of false information, the IIA asked which party might gain from the dissemination of misinformation and coded each answer.
It found that in 72% of cases, the content was likely to serve Iranian strategic narratives, while 24% appeared to support the Israeli side. The remaining 4% could not be clearly classified, the research said.
Video content accounted for 85% of all disinformation reviewed. Of this, 82% was found to be outdated, 68% misattributed geographically, and 77% presented with false contextual framing. 17% of video content was generated using artificial intelligence, and 12% was entirely fabricated.