Iran hardline media warns reformists risk 'Gorbachev moment'
Late US President Ronald Reagan (right) and former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev sign the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) treaty in the White House, December 8, 1987.
An outlet affiliated with Iran’s Guards warned on Tuesday that recent calls by reformist politicians for sweeping changes in domestic and foreign policy echoed mistakes made by Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that ultimately contributed to the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In a lengthy analysis, Tasnim News Agency said proposals by reformists amounted to “a Gorbachev moment” in which politicians, under the influence of foreign narratives, accept solutions that weaken their own national interests.
“The ‘Gorbachev moment’ refers to a situation in which a leader, fearing crisis, adopts the enemy’s prescription for survival. Out of fear of death, he commits political suicide,” wrote Jafar Hassankhani, from Tasnim’s Strategic Studies Center.
Tasnim said recent reformist statements – including open letters, an essay by former foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif in Foreign Policy, and demands by the Reform Front coalition to suspend uranium enrichment and free political prisoners – reflected a “coordinated program” that risked undermining Iran’s resilience.
“Trusting the enemy’s smiles and imagining that the solution to all of the nation’s problems lies in the hands of foreign powers is precisely what led to the disintegration of the Soviet Union,” the agency argued.
“The Supreme Leader of Iran has repeatedly stressed that diplomatic engagement and negotiations must never be interpreted as trust in the enemy. The historical experience of Gorbachev showed that trusting the enemy’s smile is nothing but an illusion, and even gestures such as the West’s open arms and friendly smiles can be part of a deception project. One of Gorbachev’s weaknesses in this regard was his tendency to seek approval,” read the article.
A separate Tasnim article on Monday accused reformist groups of “passing the ball to the enemy” by issuing a statement that, it said, paralleled Western criticism of Iran.
That piece, titled "Reformist old children helping Israel,” argued that a new Reform Front declaration calling for reconciliation and sanctions relief was reminiscent of the Freedom Movement’s 1980s calls to halt the war with Iraq after Iran recaptured Khorramshahr.
"At critical moments, both groups have tended to resort to internal blame-casting and one-sided proposals instead of supporting national interests and territorial integrity — effectively handing the other side the ammunition to justify aggression against Iran,” read the article.
Moderate and reformist figures, including Zarif, former president Hassan Rouhani and Green Movement leaders Mir-Hossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karroubi, have in recent weeks pressed for what they call a “paradigm shift” in Iran’s governance.
The Reform Front on Sunday called for a voluntary suspension of uranium enrichment in exchange for sanctions relief, broader engagement with the West, and domestic reforms including the release of political prisoners. “Iran’s social fabric was deeply wounded, with public life overshadowed by despair and anxiety,” the group said.
Rouhani argued last week that “there is no way to save the country except for all of us to become servants of the people — to recognize that sovereignty belongs to the people.”
Conservative outlets close to Khamenei have condemned the proposals as dangerous and aligned with Western agendas.
Kayhan newspaper called them “capitulation” to foreign powers, while the IRGC-linked Fars News Agency described the reformist roadmap as a “charter of submission.”
“The unfinished plan of Israel and the United States to eliminate the Islamic system continues with the assistance of those claiming to be reformists,” Kayhan wrote last week.
Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) emerged from its 12-day confrontation with Israel in June bruised but more entrenched in the country’s power structure, Bloomberg reported on Tuesday.
Bloomberg said the Israeli strikes killed many senior commanders in what was described as the most damaging conflict in the Guard’s history, forcing a restructuring of Iran’s security decision-making. Yet the confrontation has also reinforced the IRGC’s role at the heart of the Islamic Republic.
The Guard, founded after the 1979 revolution, has grown into a sprawling organization with land, naval, aerospace and intelligence arms, as well as the Quds Force for operations abroad and the Basij volunteer paramilitary.
Its influence extends into universities, hospitals, media outlets and large business conglomerates such as Khatam al-Anbiya, which is involved in oil pipelines, infrastructure, and housing projects. Estimates of its direct personnel run as high as 200,000, Bloomberg said.
“The war affirmed just how important the IRGC is,” Abdolrasool Divsallar, an Iran military analyst at Universita Cattolica in Milan, was quoted as saying.
A newly announced National Defense Council, headed by President Masoud Pezeshkian and dominated by IRGC veterans, underscores that expanded role, according to state media cited by Bloomberg.
The Guard is criticized at home and abroad. Rights groups and Western governments have accused its security branches of human rights abuses and crackdowns on dissent, while critics inside Iran link it to corruption and political repression. Supporters see it as a bulwark against Israel and the United States and as central to defending Iran’s sovereignty.
Narges Bajoghli, a professor at Johns Hopkins University, told Bloomberg: “People are angry at them, but they also realize that there is no other force in the country. What they’re committed to today is about sovereign independence and the idea of resistance.”
The IRGC’s overseas networks — Hezbollah in Lebanon, militias in Syria, and Hamas in Gaza — have been badly weakened by Israeli action, Bloomberg said. That may push the organization to focus more on nuclear deterrence, analysts said.
Ali Alfoneh, a senior fellow at the Arab Gulf States Institute, told Bloomberg: “The 12-day war exposed the IRGC’s counterintelligence failures. However, the IRGC’s loss of prestige is unlikely to lead to its capitulation.”
The report said the IRGC’s future remains closely tied to that of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, now 86, around whom the organization’s management is centralized.
It would take a US ground invasion or a sustained bombardment by both the US and Israel to change the metrics for the IRGC, Alfoneh said.
Iran hanged a man in public on Tuesday after he and his wife were convicted of murdering a mother and her three children during a robbery in October 2024, judiciary's outlet Mizan reported.
“One of the perpetrators of the brutal murder of four members of a family in Beyram, in Fars province, was hanged in public on Tuesday,” Mizan said.
Earlier in February this year, Iranian authorities hanged a man from a bridge in the northeastern city of Esfarayen, in the country’s first public execution of the year.
Iran remains one of the few countries to conduct public executions, a practice widely condemned by human rights groups.
Public hangings were halted in 2021 due to COVID-19 restrictions but resumed in 2022. That year, two people were hanged in public, increasing to seven in 2023 and four in 2024, according to Oslo-based rights group Iran Human Rights.
Iran has executed 800 people in less than eight months since the start of the year, including 30 political prisoners, according to Norway-based rights group Hengaw reported on Monday.
In June, Amnesty International warned that following the Iran-Israel conflict, Iranian authorities have called for expedited trials and executions, raising concerns over arbitrary use of the death penalty.
Last year, at least 975 people were executed in Iran, marking a 17% increase from the 834 executions recorded the previous year.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Tuesday that Tehran supported Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while voicing concern over foreign involvement near their shared border, as he met the Armenian premier in Yerevan.
“In my meeting with the prime minister of Armenia, I emphasized that the Islamic Republic of Iran firmly believes in preserving Armenia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity and maintaining warm, continuing relations between our two countries,” Pezeshkian said in a post on X.
“Our concerns regarding the presence of third-party forces near our shared borders must be fully addressed.”
At a joint press conference with Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, Pezeshkian expanded on those remarks. “Outsourcing the resolution of Caucasus issues to extra-regional forces will only complicate the situation in the region,” he said.
Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian address the media following their talks in Yerevan, Armenia, August 19, 2025.
Pezeshkian also stressed that “Iran supports the peace talks between Azerbaijan and Armenia” and added that “both the government and the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic believe relations with Armenia should be expanded in all areas.”
The remarks come after a US-brokered peace deal last week between Armenia and Azerbaijan granted Washington leasing rights to develop the Zangezur transit corridor, now renamed the Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity (TRIPP).
The deal allows a US company to build and manage the route connecting Azerbaijan with its exclave Nakhchivan, a project Tehran has repeatedly described as a geopolitical risk.
State media said Iran and Armenia signed several cooperation memoranda on diplomacy, tourism, mining, health, infrastructure and environmental issues during Pezeshkian’s trip. The two leaders also attended an official welcoming ceremony in Yerevan earlier in the day.
Guards of honour march past officials, including Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, during a welcoming ceremony before talks in Yerevan, Armenia, August 19, 2025.
Customs and transport cooperation
Additionally, Iran’s Ministry of Roads and Urban Development announced an agreement with Armenia to expand transport infrastructure and revise customs charges on vehicles entering Iran.
Road Minister Farzaneh Sadegh, who accompanied Pezeshkian, said there was an “imbalance of about $330” in vehicle fees charged by the two countries, and that Yerevan had agreed to set up a joint working group to review the matter.
She also said that “new routes must not come at the expense of geopolitical changes.”
The ministry said Armenia would soon tender contracts for the completion of the North-South transport corridor linking Russia, Iran and India via the Caucasus.
Iran’s red lines
Iran’s foreign ministry has repeatedly expressed its opposition to a foreign presence in the South Caucasus.
Also on Tuesday, Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said, "Armenia will never allow its territory to be used as a threat against Iran,” adding that Yerevan had assured Tehran it is aware of Iran’s red lines regarding the Zangezur corridor.
Araghchi said last week, “Armenian officials have told us they have respected and paid attention to all of Iran’s red lines in this matter,” he said.
Conservative MP Bob Blackman has accused Iran-linked groups of exploiting Britain’s charity sector to spread influence, writing in an op-ed after the cancellation of a children’s camp in Hertfordshire he said was run by supporters of Iran’s Supreme Leader.
“The summer camp in rural Hertfordshire is just the latest example of how Iran abuses Britain’s charity sector, exploiting our commendable history of philanthropy to spread its tentacles and influence across our land, while sowing discord in our communities,” Blackman wrote for UK-based political website ConservativeHome on Tuesday.
The summer school camp known as Camp Wilayah, run by the Ahlulbayt Islamic Mission (AIM), was cancelled last week due to what its organizer described as safety threats, following accusations by a right-wing political party that it has ties to the Islamic Republic.
Blackman criticized other London-based groups including the Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC), and the Islamic Center of England, alleging that they have ties to Iran’s leadership and spread Tehran-backed narratives through UK-registered charities.
"Two other London charities with links to Iran, Dar Al Hekma Trust and Abrar Islamic Foundation, are currently being probed by the national terrorist financial investigation unit," he added.
Pointing to the government’s new foreign-influence registration rules, Blackman urged tougher action against “pro-Iranian regime activists” and questioned whether the IRGC would be proscribed by the United Kingdom.
“A start would be ridding our charity sector of extremists,” he said.
On June 30, a report by The Telegraph accused Iran of conducting a “shadow war” inside the United Kingdom that extends beyond sanctions violations and includes propaganda, financial networks, and digital disinformation campaigns aimed at dividing society
In July, John Woodcock, Baron Walney, the UK government’s former extremism adviser, said: “We cannot allow propaganda and influence from this theocratic dictatorship to be spread to children in the UK.”
A fierce battle has erupted inside Iran’s political establishment over the country’s future, with moderates urging sweeping reforms and hardliners branding their proposals a thinly veiled bid for regime change.
The dispute was set off on August 15 when former foreign minister Mohammad Javad Zarif published an essay in Foreign Policy titled “The Time for a Paradigm Shift Is Now.”
Zarif urged Iran to embrace “a new approach rooted in domestic reform,” warning that “warmongers benefit from closing every window to democracy.”
He called for a shift to a “possibilities paradigm” based on negotiation rather than confrontation.
Hardliners reacted with fury.
‘Delusional’
Outlets close to the Supreme Leader and the Revolutionary Guards — including Kayhan, Javan, and Vatan Emrooz — denounced the proposals as treasonous, delusional, and "capitulation" to the West.
Zarif was labeled an “anti-resistance liberal” who welcomed US and Israeli aggression as “blessings in disguise.”
Hardline commentator Abdollah Ganji accused moderates of “prioritizing personal power over national interests,” while Kayhan’s chief and supreme leader appointee Hossein Shariatmadari charged they were “ignoring global power dynamics.”
The clash comes as economic strain, political discontent, and renewed external pressure after the war with Israel sharpen the stakes for both camps.
‘Will of the people’
In recent weeks, former prime minister Mir-Hossein Mousavi and allies have issued open letters demanding democracy, while the Reform Front — an umbrella group of moderate and reformist figures — called for measures including suspension of uranium enrichment.
Former president Hassan Rouhani has also weighed in, advocating a “national strategy based on the will of the people.”
Beyond politicians, 180 economists urged a reordering of “Iran’s economic and political paradigms,” and 78 former diplomats pressed for a foreign policy more in tune with public sentiment.
The apparently concerted effort has been met by increasingly harsh reactions from the opposite camp.
In parliament, ultraconservatives such as Amir Hossein Sabeti and Hamid Rasai insisted the Islamic Republic must rely on resistance, not diplomacy, to survive.
Ganji also went after Rouhani personally, reminding readers that he once called for executing monarchy-era army officers in 1979, and warning he could “ultimately betray the revolution” like some of the Prophet’s disciples.
The battle is likely to intensify as pressure mounts, with the looming prospect of UN sanctions snapping back into place, the shadow of another war with Israel, and growing public frustration at home.
But as the reformist outlet Rouydad24 concluded, the exchanges have left “conservatives enraged, reformists uncertain, and the idea of national reconciliation in a state of lull.”