Baghdad fully supports the ongoing negotiations between Washington and Tehran, said Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein, cautioning that a breakdown in diplomacy could trigger “catastrophic consequences” across the region.
“The fear is that the two sides will not reach any deal,” Hussein said in an interview with Asharq Al-Awsat's Washington bureau chief Hiba Nasr.
He added that any agreement between the US and Iran “will not be at the expense of other regional parties,” and urged the continuation of talks.
The next round of Oman-mediated negotiations is expected to be held in Rome on Saturday.


Iran hopes to resolve its biggest foreign affairs challenge through talks with the United States at the same time it grapples with some of the toughest domestic problems in the Islamic Republic's nearly 50-year history.
Some commentators and former officials say the government of Masoud Pezeshkian is unable to resolve even the simplest domestic political issues that could improve the lives of ordinary Iranians.
One example, noted by centrist politician and former presidential candidate Mostafa Hashemi-Taba, is the failure to adopt daylight saving time to help with Iran's energy crisis.
Iran's parliament recently discussed the importance of the measure, but lawmakers refused to prioritize the bill, with Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf joking that the matter would be taken up at a later date.
In an interview with the news website Rouydad24, Hashemi-Taba attributed such failures to a "lack of rationality" in governance.
"The government has no principles when it comes to addressing problems," he said, accusing officials of resorting to empty slogans instead of practical solutions, and engaging in futile debates until a new crisis diverts attention from unresolved issues.
"There is no public participation in Iran. Only a select group of people make decisions," Hashemi-Taba said.
Another stalled initiative is changing the weekend from Thursday–Friday to Saturday–Sunday to facilitate international commerce.
Despite months of debate in parliament and other government offices, the measure—deemed necessary by some economists—has been dismissed by some lawmakers with bizarre arguments.
Any weekend change, some critics have asserted, could hinder population growth, since Iranians traditionally conceive children on Thursday nights, and a Saturday–Sunday weekend would disrupt this pattern, as people would have to work on Fridays.
Meanwhile, more pressing issues, such as water and energy shortages, remain unresolved.
Tehran's freshwater resources stand at just 14% of their usual levels, according to official statistics, prompting the capital's governor to declare a water shortage emergency last week.
The government has not managed to find a solution, instead proposing to divert water from other regions—an approach that could cause shortages elsewhere.
Civil unrest erupted in the historic city of Isfahan last week, as residents took matters into their own hands by blocking the flow of water from the Zayandeh Rood River to neighboring Yazd Province.
Electricity is in short supply too, causing regular power cuts in the capital and other regions. Officials have released a blackout schedule, but people say it lacks clarity, leaving them to discover outages only when they are plunged into darkness.
"Fake experts make all the wrong decisions and prevent a minority of true experts from solving problems," prominent sociologist Taqi Azad Armaki told the news website Fararu.
The problem, Armaki argued, is that the government cannot compile or prioritize the crises it faces, as those making crucial decisions lack expertise and are disconnected from what the people want.
"The majority of our society desires peace, jobs and engagement with the world, free from constant worry," Armaki said. "This group constitutes approximately 90 percent of the population. But there is a 5-percent minority that opposes such a lifestyle.
"Those elected to parliament with the support of this minority are louder and disproportionately influential," he added. "The country's resources have been distributed unfairly and unevenly between these two groups."
Iranian insurance firms said they will only compensate victims of port explosion in line with their existing contracts, even as authorities vowed payments within 48 hours for those already identified.
“Each company pays according to its own commitment, not beyond that,” Alborz Insurance CEO Mousa Rezaei told Eqtesad24.
Hormozgan judiciary chief Mojtaba Ghahremani said insurers have been notified of 25 identified fatalities and will disburse payments swiftly. He added that families of unidentified victims would be compensated once identities are confirmed.

An Iranian official says the explosion that struck Rajaei port engulfed a 15-hectare section of the container yard.
“The cause (of the explosion) and contents of the damaged containers are being investigated under the supervision of the Hormozgan governor general,” said Saeed Rasouli, acting head of the Ports and Maritime Organization on Tuesday.
He said operations at other terminals remain “completely safe and active.”
According to authorities, the blast killed 70, left six missing, and injured over 1,000.

Iran's exiled prince Reza Pahlavi accused the Islamic Republic of covering up the explosion at Rajaei port, calling it “an organized crime, part of a chain of atrocities committed by the regime and its perpetrators.”
“Three days have passed since the horrific disaster in Bandar Abbas, and as usual, the Islamic Republic has chosen the path of suppression, lies, and concealment instead of accountability and transparency,” he wrote in a post on X.
“For Iran and Iranians, nothing is more deadly and dangerous than the Islamic Republic,” he added.

Iran is stepping up diplomatic outreach to the E3 group of countries—France, Britain and Germany—in an effort to delay or prevent their activation of the so-called snapback mechanism built into a 2015 deal if nuclear talks with the United States fail.
The so-called snapback of UN sanctions on Iran can technically be restored automatically if any party to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) deems Iran to be non-compliant.
But after US President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the deal in 2018, Washington cannot itself trigger the snapback but those European countries can, giving them key leverage as the high-stakes diplomacy rumbles on.
Appearing to recognize their clout, Tehran has proposed a meeting with the E3 in either Rome or in Tehran on the Friday before the US talks are due to enter their fourth round, Reuters reported citing diplomatic sources.
An Iranian official cited by the news agency said the E3 had yet to respond.
The initiative follows Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi’s public offer last week to travel to Britain, France, and Germany for nuclear discussions with his counterparts. None have formally responded to his proposal yet.
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot on Monday warned that the E3 would not hesitate to trigger the snapback clause if Iran’s nuclear escalation was deemed a threat to European security.
“Iran is on the verge of acquiring nuclear weapons,” Barrot told reporters. “There is no military solution to the Iranian nuclear problem. There is a diplomatic path to achieve it, but it is a narrow road.”
Barrot added that the E3 remains in close contact with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on the issue, who said before the US-Iran talks began this year that Trump sought the snapback of sanctions.
Tehran faces tight deadline before JCPOA sunset
The three powers are currently negotiating with Iran about future steps to salvage the agreement, and they last met in January in Geneva.
In March, the E3 issued a joint statement expressing concerns over Iran's nuclear activities, including unprecedented enrichment levels, advanced centrifuge deployment, lack of transparency and threats to non-proliferation.
With UN Security Council Resolution 2231—which enshrined the JCPOA—set to expire in October 2025, Iran has a narrow window to persuade the countries not to trigger the sanctions.
Tehran has warned that it may withdraw from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) in retaliation if the sanctions are triggered.
As with North Korea in 2003, leaving the NPT would lift Iran’s legal obligation to remain a non-nuclear weapons state and allow it to end IAEA inspections and monitoring entirely.
Such a move would escalate tensions dramatically, raising the risk of preemptive military action by Israel or the United States and potentially sparking a regional arms race if countries like Saudi Arabia seek to develop their own nuclear programs.
How the snapback mechanism works
Under UN Security Council Resolution 2231, any JCPOA participant—the E3, Russia, China or the United States —could file a non-compliance complaint with the UN Security Council.
The other participants in the JCPOA have argued that the United States can no longer enforce the snapback mechanism because it withdrew from it in 2018.
If no resolution is adopted to continue sanctions relief within 30 days, all previous UN sanctions are automatically reimposed, including cargo inspections on Iranian shipments, Reinstated arms embargoes and restrictions on missile-related technologies.
This automatic snapback process cannot be vetoed—even by permanent members like Russia or China, which have boosted ties with Iran in recent years and whose relationship with the West is increasingly adversarial.
Although both countries may oppose the move politically, they lack the power to stop it once initiated.
To avert snapback, the Council must pass a resolution during the 30-day review period to continue sanctions relief. But any permanent member can veto it—meaning if the US or E3 object, the resolution will fail, and sanctions will snap back by default.






