A former Iranian diplomat has made an odd statement, asserting that it doesn't matter to Iran who leads the next US administration, just one day after Donald Trump was nominated as the Republican presidential candidate.
Saying this in an interview with Khabar Online website in Tehran Fereidoun Majlesi added: "We have had enough tensions. It is now time for peace." In another odd statement the former diplomat said that political parties do not determine American foreign policy, perhaps hinting that Washington’s position regarding Iran transcends Republican or Democratic administrations.
The centrist website noted that the United States currently shows little interest in political changes in Iran or nuclear negotiations with Iranian officials. At the same time, Iran's President-elect Masoud Pezeshkian, in his latest statements, welcomed negotiations with Europe but expressed no interest in talks with the United States.
The discussion about what will follow the recent presidential elections in Iran is a recurrent theme in Tehran’s government-controlled media, that mostly tries to highlight Pezeshkian’s positive statements about the need to have good relations with other countries. But media outlets rarely mention his back-and-forth messages of support for Iran’s militant proxy forces.
Highlighting that Iran has lagged behind in development for 45 years, Majlesi stated that Iran needs to reduce tensions with the United States and Israel and demonstrate goodwill to reach a compromise and normalize the situation. Additionally, Iran should accept international banking protocols and conduct transactions using US dollars to facilitate international trade.
However, no media outlet mentions that this requires a drastic change in foreign policy that only Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei can authorize.
Meanwhile, in an interview with the Iranian Labor News Agency (ILNA), international relations analyst Reza Nasri said that if the Pezeshkian administration is looking for economic development, it should first seek security and stability in the region.
Nasri added that like Saudi officials, Pezeshkian believes that regional countries should not waste their financial resources on attritional conflicts. Majlesi had also pointed out that so far, Iran has been wasting its resources in wars against other regional and Muslim countries.
Nasri explained that Pezeshkian's declared foreign policy is based on the three pillars of balanced relations with regional states, constructive interaction to facilitate development and adopting policies that would not be costly for the people's livelihood. He also pointed out that Tehran and the United States should conduct negotiations at one point as both are major players in the region and cannot ignore each other.
To this end, he said, Pezeshkian should put together an agile foreign policy team of pragmatic officials mindful of the fact that unpredictable situations might be awaiting us six months later. The new Iranian foreign policy team should be prepared to face any scenario, he added.
Nonetheless, speaking about the support Pezeshkian has expressed for the "axis of resistance," – or Iran’s proxies - Nasri said that a solid and strong diplomacy by Iran as well as international support for the Palestinian cause, could turn the resistance into a legitimate "liberation movement."
Meanwhile, former ambassador to the United Kingdom Mohammad Hossein Adeli told the press in Tehran that "Iran is playing a game at the edge of a cliff," and added that "those who still talk about circumventing the sanctions are in fact thinking of the continuation of sanctions." He was likely referring to influential insiders who are widely believed to be profiting from the US oil export and international banking sanctions.
Adeli warned that "The slightest error in foreign policy can drag Iran into an instability that might affect the country's existence." He urged Pezeshkian to adopt a realistic approach and carefully assess the regional and international situation.
Adeli further cautioned that regional developments could lead Iran into a war benefiting Israel and the United States. He stressed the need for Pezeshkian to assemble a foreign policy team capable of navigating and avoiding such dangerous scenarios.
