The hardline Kayhan newspaper criticized the new defense pact between Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Pakistan on Saturday, questioning whether Islamabad could continue to serve as a credible mediator between Iran and the United States.
Kayhan editor Hossein Shariatmadari argued that Pakistan’s participation in the Mecca Joint Defense Agreement, under which an armed attack on one member would be treated as an attack on all three, was incompatible with its mediation role.
He also pointed to Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s praise of Donald Trump and Pakistan’s participation in a separate regional initiative focused on security in the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab as evidence, in his view, that Islamabad was moving closer to governments confronting Iran and the Houthis.
Shariatmadari portrayed both initiatives as ultimately directed against Iran and its regional allies, though officials from Turkey and Saudi Arabia have said the Mecca agreement is defensive and is not aimed at any specific country.
The pact has also prompted debate inside Iran over its military significance. Hesameddin Ashena, an adviser in former president Hassan Rouhani’s administration, said the agreement could alter the regional rules of conflict by reducing the effectiveness of threats against Persian Gulf states and increasing the possibility that Turkey and Pakistan could become involved if Saudi Arabia were attacked.