• العربية
  • فارسی
Brand
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
  • Theme
  • Language
    • العربية
    • فارسی
  • Iran Insight
  • Politics
  • Economy
  • Analysis
  • Special Report
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Live TV
All rights reserved for Volant Media UK Limited
volant media logo

Tehran says US pushing for diplomacy after strikes fell short

Aug 20, 2025, 18:52 GMT+1Updated: 02:59 GMT+0
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi

Tehran on Wednesday accused Washington of seeking through diplomacy what it failed to achieve with military strikes, suggesting that talks with the United States have not yet reached a “mature stage.”

Foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said the US wants to ensure Iran’s nuclear activities are completely disabled, and is pressing Tehran to sign a binding agreement since that has not happened.

“One of our problems, both during previous negotiations and now, is that we have not heard a coherent statement from the Americans. Their statements constantly change, and the messages we receive are contradictory,” Araghchi said.

“Sometimes the messages differ from each other, and sometimes they differ from the interviews. I think perhaps the Americans have not yet reached a final conclusion and may be caught up in other issues,” he added.

Iran’s national security chief Ali Larijani said last week that talks with the US are possible, but only if aimed at a genuine resolution.

Negotiations under the Trump administration began with a 60-day ultimatum to Iran.

On the 61st day, June 13, Israel launched a surprise military campaign. Less than two weeks later, on June 24, the United States struck three major nuclear sites in Esfahan, Fordow, and Natanz, claiming Iran’s facilities had been “obliterated.”

Strained relations with watchdog

Araghchi said Tehran is also negotiating with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), stressing that unless Iran withdraws from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, cooperation will continue.

“We cannot completely cut off cooperation with the Agency,” he added. “In about a month, it’s time to replace the fuel at the Bushehr power plant, and this must be done in the presence of Agency inspectors.”

But that would not mean a return to pre-war arrangements, he stressed quickly.

“This new cooperation with the Agency will definitely not be like before, especially since, according to parliament’s law, all matters must go through the Supreme National Security Council, which decides where and how inspections will take place, or whether they will happen at all.”

UN sanctions looming

Araghchi also warned that UN “snapback” sanctions could return but said Tehran is working with Russia and China to prepare for such a scenario.

“For several years, we’ve been working with China and Russia on this issue. We’ve held numerous joint meetings and designed a set of joint measures to implement if snapback is triggered,” he said.

The snapback mechanism, part of UN Security Council Resolution 2231 that endorsed the 2015 nuclear deal, allows any party to restore sanctions if Iran is accused of non-compliance.

France, the UK and Germany have warned Iran they will restore UN measures unless talks resume and produce results by the end of August.

“Regarding solutions to ultimately prevent snapback, discussions have taken place among our three countries, and we have some measures in mind, though we may not succeed,” Iran’s foreign minister said.

Most Viewed

Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing
1
ANALYSIS

Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing

2
ANALYSIS

Iran’s missing fuel: Can border smuggling explain it all?

3

Iranian banks remain open in UAE as US campaign squeezes Dubai trade - FT

4
ANALYSIS

What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

5
PODCAST

Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?

Banner
Banner

Spotlight

  • What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future
    ANALYSIS

    What the US-Venezuela oil model could mean for Iran’s energy future

  • Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing
    ANALYSIS

    Washington’s economic war on Iran starts in Dubai, not Beijing

  • Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?
    PODCAST

    Iran’s political prisoners are being executed. Why is supporting them controversial?

  • Iran’s missing fuel: Can border smuggling explain it all?
    ANALYSIS

    Iran’s missing fuel: Can border smuggling explain it all?

  • Iran bets on China to blunt Trump’s economic offensive
    INSIGHT

    Iran bets on China to blunt Trump’s economic offensive

  • Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr
    ANALYSIS

    Iran or the dollar? US makes an example of Banque Misr

  • War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price
    ANALYSIS

    War or deal? Rezaei begins to define Iran’s price

Banner