Satellite images show impact of Iran's Rajaei port explosion

The incident occurred at the Ava Nar Parsian Chemical Industries warehouse in the Meymeh district of Isfahan province, according to the provincial crisis management office.

Emergency services and firefighters were dispatched to the site. No official cause has been announced.

The blast comes amid a wave of explosions across Iran, including a deadly fire at a fuel depot in Zahedan on Monday that killed one person and critically injured two others, according to the local rights group Hal Vash.

Over the past four days, at least 73 people have been reported killed in similar incidents nationwide, including 70 killed in Saturday’s massive explosion at Rajaei port in the southern city of Bandar Abbas.

The site of Tuesday’s blast, Ava Nar Parsian, according to its website, manufactures fireworks and gunpowder and operates under the supervision of Iran’s National Security Council—the country’s highest decision-making body on security matters.

However, investigations by Iran International suggest the company may also be linked to Iran's security and military apparatus.

One of Ava Nar Parsian’s top executives, Damoun Beheshtnejad, previously held a managerial position at Nargostar Sepahan, another chemical facility in Isfahan that was the site of a major explosion in June 2021.

At the time, British newspaper The Guardian reported that the complex housed the Iran Aircraft Manufacturing Industrial Company (HESA), a key player in the Islamic Republic’s drone program.

According to official company filings, certain decisions at Ava Nar Parsian fall under the authority of the "Intelligence Protection Organization for Weapons and Ammunition Management of Isfahan Province." The company is licensed to produce, trade, import, and export commercial, industrial, and chemical explosives.

A member of Iran’s national security and foreign policy commission said sabotage, including a possible drone attack or infiltration, must be considered among the main scenarios behind the Bandar Abbas port explosion, Iranian media reported on Tuesday.

Mohammad Mehdi Shahriari told Rouydad24 news outlet that while the blast could have resulted from negligence or an accident, security agencies were also investigating the possibility of deliberate sabotage.

“One main scenario is that this tragic event was caused by sabotage through micro-drones or an infiltrator,” Shahriari said, adding that the national security commission would seriously examine these possibilities.

He also linked the explosion’s timing to ongoing US-Iran nuclear talks, suggesting that hostile actors might have sought to disrupt negotiations. Shahriari cautioned, however, that no definitive conclusions could be drawn until investigations were complete.

Iran’s port authority said full cargo operations have resumed at Bandar Abbas’s Shahid Rajaei terminal after an explosion on Saturday that killed at least 70 people.

Saeed Rasouli, acting head of Iran’s Ports and Maritime Organization, said 26 ships were currently docking and unloading at the port, with marine operations continuing under safety standards.

He said the blast affected about 15 hectares of the container yard, but other areas and terminals remained secure and operational. Investigations into the cause of the explosion and the contents of damaged containers are ongoing under the supervision of Hormozgan’s governor, Rasouli added.

Insurance companies are on site assessing damages, and the port authority has launched repairs in affected areas. Rasouli said port services were running at full capacity and there was no disruption to maritime or shipping operations.

Bandar Abbas’s Shahid Rajaei terminal handles around 70 million tonnes of cargo annually and includes 23 berths. Only one berth sustained serious damage in the blast, according to officials.

Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) said no military cargo was involved in the deadly explosion at Bandar Abbas port, stressing the site handled only commercial shipments.

“This pier is a commercial terminal and military cargo does not transit through it. We had no knowledge of, or mission related to, the cargo,” said Ehsan Moazen, deputy public relations chief of the IRGC Navy, according to Iranian media.

The third round of indirect talks between Iran and the US in Muscat has been met with largely positive reactions from European officials, media, and think tanks, generating a spark of hope that Europe is determined to back the diplomatic track, according to an analysis by Iran's official IRNA news agency.

IRNA reported that the Muscat discussions, mediated by Oman, were described as positive,constructive,and showing progress by both sides, a sentiment echoed across Europe.

The analysis pointed to the European Union spokesperson’s remarks that any development increasing the likelihood of a diplomatic solution is a step in the right direction, emphasizing the EU's commitment to a diplomatic resolution.

The analysis highlighted the support expressed by France, Germany, and the United Kingdom for the continuation of dialogue.

British Foreign Secretary David Lemi's visit to Muscat after the talks and French Foreign Ministry spokesperson Christophe Lemoine's reaffirmation of Paris's commitment to a diplomatic solution shows Europe's alignment with the ongoing efforts, IRNA said.