Guards-Affiliated Iran Newspaper Sees Positive Signs In Nuclear Talks

News emerged on Friday that Iran was accepting to continue talks based on earlier understanding reached in June, while media in Iran insisted that Tehran stands firm on its new demands.

Analysts in Iran began mentioning that Tehran sees the nuclear negotiations as an issue of lifting sanctions, while it has truned in to a security problem for the world.

An Iranian analyst in Germany, Mehran Barati told the Iran International TV Friday that this could be a negotiating tactic by the Iranian delegation to say that they accept the June 20 draft agreement but have some new additions. These include demands for a continued commitment to the JCPOA by the United States, and verification of US promises, before returning to its commitments under the JCPOA.

Barati said that in the June agreement the United States had accepted to lift 94 percent of the sanctions it has imposed on Iran since 2018 when it withdrew from the JCPOA. The remaining 6 percent was about sanctions related to terrorism and human rights violation and affect Iranian leaders. Barati added that from a legal point of view, the United States cannot lift those sanctions.

He also noted that the Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei makes all the decisions about the negotiations and President Ebrahim Raisi and Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian cannot intervene in the matter while Khamenei continues the talks using his relative Ali Bagheri Kani as his proxy.

In the meantime, the Iranian administration-linked semi-official news agency ISNA on Thursday summed up views expressed by Iranian analysts and experts on the future of the Vienna talks after pundits discussed the matter on the audio chat application Clubhouse on Tuesday.

According to ISNA, a foreign policy analyst Ali Montazeri summarized Iran's mistakes in nuclear negotiations during the past 20 years. He said that some domestic political disputes between President Ahmadinejad and then-security chief Ali Larijani also led to the failure of the talks in early 2010s. Montazeri also said that Iranians are frustrated by the high cost of prolonged negotiations that have not solved the country's problems.

Nuclear policy analyst Foad Sadeghi said that during the past 20 years the nuclear talks have been the country's main challenge. "We have paid a high price for it and yet, we are once again at the intersection trying to decide whether to return to our commitments under the JCPOA or to face further sanctions and UN Security Council resolutions." He also said, "Most of what we think are our leverage and bargaining chips, are in fact not justifiable and work against us."

Former diplomat Ghasem Mohebali said that Iran's nuclear program has become too costly for the nation while no one is still able to benefit from it as it has been turned into a security issue against the country. He said until 2009, domestic discussion about the nuclear issue was whether Iran should surrender to the West's demands without anything in return. After that, the problem changed to surrendering to the West's demands for sanctions relief. He said it was a mistake to portray a security problem as an economic challenge. The fact that the JCPOA says that after eight years Iran's nuclear program will be peaceful means that the world has initially perceived Iran's nuclear program as a hostile program.

Another former diplomat Javid Ghorbanoghlou said in the Clubhouse debate: "Iran has never had a defined nuclear strategy backed by the people. This was the main reason why it has been turned into a security issue."

A European source quoted by Reuters had said earlier Friday that Iran was willing to continue the Vienna talks on the basis of texts prepared in June and added that world powers would test in the next couple of days whether this was true.

Iran government news website IRNA claimed on Friday that talks are progressing based on proposals Iran made last week, while the United States and its European allies had dismissed two documents Iran had presented as a basis of talks.

Tasnim news agency affiliated with the Revolutionary Guard said that there has been no change in Iran’s negotiating position. The agency quoted a source close to Iran’s negotiating team that “Our negotiating position has not been changed and [Iran] has not taken back its draft [proposals]. The other parties have accepted to continue talks on the basis of Iran’s demands.”

It is not clear if Iran's denials of accepting the June agreement as basis for more talks is aimed at a domestic audience to portray toughness.

The new government in Tehran has been demanding that all US sanctions imposed since Donald Trump withdrew from the nuclear deal to be removed at once before it agrees to scale back nuclear activities it has expanded since 2019.

Talks on reviving the 2015 Iran nuclear deal resumed on Thursday with the United States and Israel ramping up the rhetorical pressure on Tehran about the possible economic or military consequences if diplomacy fails.

Iran's top negotiator said at the Thursday session that Tehran was sticking to the stance it laid out last week, when the talks broke off with European and U.S. officials accusing Iran of making new demands and of reneging on compromises worked out earlier this year.

"Iran said it accepted to work from the June texts. This will now be put to the test over the next couple of days," the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Working groups to discuss sanctions Washington might lift and the nuclear curbs Tehran needs to observe convene on Friday.

"Iran's seriousness is obvious. See who has cancelled other meetings and is in Vienna and who is not," Iranian negotiator Ali Bagheri Kani told Reuters.

His comments suggested he was alluding to the United States' chief negotiator Rob Malley, who is not expected to arrive in the Austrian capital until the weekend.

"Negotiations on Iran’s (new) drafts are going on," Bagheri Kani added.

Western officials have said Iran has abandoned any compromises it had made in the previous six rounds of talks, pocketed those made by others, and demanded more last week.

Iran wants all sanctions imposed by the United States after then-U.S. President Donald Trump ditched the deal in 2018, to be lifted in a verifiable process. Iran began violating the deal's nuclear restrictions about a year after the U.S. withdrawal.

A source quoted by Reuters said that Iran was willing to continue the Vienna talks on the basis of texts prepared in June and added that world powers would test in the next couple of days whether this was true.

Iran's Tasnim news agency affiliated with the Revolutionary Guard said Iran has not changed its negotiating position.

The official government news website IRNA also reiterated that diplomats in Vienna are reviewing Iran's new proposals.

Working groups to discuss sanctions and the nuclear aspects of reviving a 2015 deal will begin on Friday.

The first six rounds of nuclear talks in Vienna drafted texts that the new Iranian government did not recognize as an a basis of new talks. It argued for everything to be renegotiated, demanding that all post-2018 US sanctions be removed at once before it would return to compliance with the 2015 nuclear deal, JCPOA.

The United States and its European allies were dismayed by Iran’s new demands and have warned that time is running out for progress in the talks.

"Iran said it accepted to work from the June texts. This will now be put to the test over the next couple of days," the source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

In her daily briefing on Thursday spokesperson Jen Psaki reiterated that President Joe Biden remains committed prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons through diplomacy. “However, given the ongoing advances in Iran's nuclear program, the president has asked his team to be prepared in the event that diplomacy fails, and we must turn to other options and that requires preparations,” she said.

The Biden Administration decided to return to the 2015 nuclear agreement, JCPOA, abandoned by the former president Donald Trump, and as soon as it took office negotiations began in Vienna in April between the signatories of the agreement.

Diplomats said the talks had made some progress, but Iran has now ramped up its demands, insisting on all US nuclear sanction to be removed at once, which has led to a deadlock.

Asked about what threshold or deadline for the US is to decide that talks have failed, Psaki refused to be specific.

"I'm not going to present a deadline today, but what I can tell you is that we have presented a diplomatic path forward. That path is still open, but based on the outcome of the last round of talks and the ongoing advancements in Iran's nuclear facilities, we are laying the path, the groundwork for another path entirely. So it's just meant to be preparations,” the White House spokesperson said.

The Vienna talks resumed on Thursday, but the first session lasted just one hour, and Iran said that it is standing firm on its position.

State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters on Thursday it will take a few days to judge whether Iran is showing flexibility in the talks.

"It will probably (be) another couple of days until we have sense of where the Iranians are in the context of the restart of this round and ... the flexibility that they may or may not be willing to show," Price said.

The complexity is that if the US lifts all sanctions at once it loses leverage it needs to make sure that Iran’s path to nuclear weapons is blocked permanently. Washington wants to restore the JCPOA and move farther, engaging with Iran to expand nuclear restrictions and discuss its ballistic missile program, as well as its destabilizing regional policies.

This is what US allies in the region, mainly Israel and Saudi Arabia, who feel threatened by Iran, are insisting on. The Israeli defense minister Benny Gantz visiting Washington and Saudi foreign minister Faisal bin Farahan on Thursday reiterated their position that restoring the JCPOA is not enough, and it would simply give Iran sanctions relief, while not preventing it from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Gantz raised the issue of joint military readiness to be able to halt Iran's nuclear aspirations, if necessary, in his meeting with US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin.

The US will also send a senior government delegation to the United Arab Emirates next week to meet with banks over concerns about Iran sanctions compliance, a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday. The move suggests Washington is looking to crank up economic pressure on.

Israel's visiting defense chief Benny Gantz raised the issue of joint military readiness to be able to halt Iran's nuclear aspirations, if necessary.

Reuters had exclusively reported that Thursday's US-Israeli agenda was expected to include discussions about possible military exercises that would prepare for a worst-case scenario to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities should diplomacy fail and if their nations' leaders request it.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said at the start of the meeting with, Gantz, that Iran had failed to offer constructive diplomatic engagement in talks that President Joe Biden had hoped would revive a 2015 nuclear deal abandoned by his predecessor, Donald Trump.

Austin said Biden was "prepared to turn to other options" if the current American policy on Iran fails.

"We are completely aligned in our commitment to preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. This is a national security interest of the United States and Israel and the world," Austin said.

Gantz described Iran, Israel's arch foe, as "the biggest threat to the global and regional peace and stability."

After meeting Austin, he held talks with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken.

Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons, saying it wants to master nuclear technology for peaceful purposes. But sweeping demands by Iran's new, hardline government in talks have heightening suspicions in the West that Iran is playing for time while advancing its nuclear program.

With the 2015 deal's nuclear benefits now badly compromised, some Western officials say there is little time left before the foundation of the deal is damaged beyond repair. Under the accord, Iran curbed its nuclear program in return for relief from economic sanctions.

After meeting Blinken Gantz later tweeted, “We touched om challenges and opportunities of common strategic importance, including the growing threat of Iranian nuclear and hegemonic aspirations…”

DETERRENCE

The Pentagon declined comment on the Reuters report, which also disclosed an Oct. 25 briefing by Defense Department officials to US National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan on the full range of military options to ensure that Iran would not be able to produce a nuclear weapon.

"I know there's interest in a certain Reuters report," Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told a news briefing.

"I will tell you this: We routinely conduct exercises and training with our Israeli counterparts and I have nothing to announce to or speak to or point to or speculate about today."

State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters he would not want to "speak to contingency planning" if diplomacy isn't viable in the short term.

Drills by the United States and Israel could address calls by Dennis Ross, a former senior U.S. official and Middle East expert, and others to signal openly to Tehran that the United States and Israel remain serious about preventing it from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

"Biden needs to disabuse Iran of the notion that Washington will not act militarily and will stop Israel from doing so," Ross wrote last month.

Ross also suggested the United States could signal a willingness to give the Israelis the US military's bunker-busting Massive Ordnance Penetrator, a 30,000-pound (13,600-kg) bomb.

Iran is enriching uranium up to 60 percent in violation of the 2015 nuclear agreement, JCPOA. This would potentially bring Tehran to within weeks of producing a nuclear device.

Central Intelligence Agency Director Bill Burns said on Monday that the CIA does not believe Iran's supreme leader has decided to take steps to weaponize a nuclear device but noted advances in its ability to enrich uranium, one pathway to the fissile material for a bomb.

Burns cautioned that, even if Iran decided to go ahead, it would still require a lot of work to weaponize that fissile material before attaching a nuclear weapon to a missile or other delivery system.

"But they're further along in their mastery of the nuclear fuel cycle and that's the kind of knowledge that is very difficult to sanction away or make disappear," he said.

US officials have also long worried about America's ability to detect and destroy dispersed components of Iran's nuclear weaponization program once enough fissile material for a bomb were produced.

Reporting by Reuters